Many people are aware that in a tax year in which neither a revaluation nor reassessment has occurred, in order to prevail in a real property tax appeal, the Taxpayer must prove that the true market valuation placed upon the property by the assessment exceeds its real value by at least fifteen percent (15%).
By statute, each assessment is accorded a fifteen percent (15%) safe harbor in recognition of the fact that appraisals and assessments are not an exact science.However, an additional burden placed upon the Taxpayer is to overcome a presumption that the assessment is valid.Without overcoming this presumption, the Taxpayer is not even permitted to prove the fifteen percent (15%) or greater differential.
In a recent decision, Dericks v. Borough of Bradley Beach (Docket #13772-2012 J. Sundar), the Tax Court reviewed the appeal of the Taxpayer from a County Board Judgment that reduced the assessed value on a condominium from Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000.00) to Three Hundred Nine Thousand Dollars ($309,000.00).The Taxpayer urged the Court to find a further reduction to Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($245,000.00) and the Town also appealed seeking a reinstatement of the original assessed value.In reviewing the proofs presented, the Court rejected the comparables and the adjustments provided by both parties.While both parties agreed that a certain particular unit sale was an appropriate comparable sale, the Court found both parties reasoning flawed when adjusting that sale to utilize it for comparability purposes as to the subject property.Moreover, the Town offered only one (1) other property as a comparable and the Taxpayer offered none.
Based upon the paucity of information available before the Court, the Court felt constrained to leave the judgment of the County Board intacted holding that such proofs were insufficient to overcome the presumption of validity.
This case is instructive to any residential property owner attempting to challenge the assessment on his/her home.To overcome the presumption of validity, you must give the Court the ability to find that there is something dramatically wrong with the assessment.This is done by providing sufficient comparable sales along with adjustments of those sales to make them relevant to your property.Adjustments include raising or lowering the assessment based upon size of the property, number of bedrooms, bathrooms, age of the kitchen, size of the land and other relevant matters that would influence valuation.In small matters such as a residential appeal where typically a taxpayer is unrepresented by counsel, the Taxpayer is going unarmed against a professional in the form of the local tax assessor.The more information you can provide to the Court, the better equipped you will be to overcome the presumption of validity and be permitted to prove your case.
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Presumption of Validity - The Burden Bears the Taxpayers
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Many people are aware that in a tax year in which neither a revaluation nor reassessment has occurred, in order to prevail in a real property tax appeal, the Taxpayer must prove that the true market valuation placed upon the property by the assessment exceeds its real value by at least fifteen percent (15%).
By statute, each assessment is accorded a fifteen percent (15%) safe harbor in recognition of the fact that appraisals and assessments are not an exact science.However, an additional burden placed upon the Taxpayer is to overcome a presumption that the assessment is valid.Without overcoming this presumption, the Taxpayer is not even permitted to prove the fifteen percent (15%) or greater differential.
In a recent decision, Dericks v. Borough of Bradley Beach (Docket #13772-2012 J. Sundar), the Tax Court reviewed the appeal of the Taxpayer from a County Board Judgment that reduced the assessed value on a condominium from Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000.00) to Three Hundred Nine Thousand Dollars ($309,000.00).The Taxpayer urged the Court to find a further reduction to Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($245,000.00) and the Town also appealed seeking a reinstatement of the original assessed value.In reviewing the proofs presented, the Court rejected the comparables and the adjustments provided by both parties.While both parties agreed that a certain particular unit sale was an appropriate comparable sale, the Court found both parties reasoning flawed when adjusting that sale to utilize it for comparability purposes as to the subject property.Moreover, the Town offered only one (1) other property as a comparable and the Taxpayer offered none.
Based upon the paucity of information available before the Court, the Court felt constrained to leave the judgment of the County Board intacted holding that such proofs were insufficient to overcome the presumption of validity.
This case is instructive to any residential property owner attempting to challenge the assessment on his/her home.To overcome the presumption of validity, you must give the Court the ability to find that there is something dramatically wrong with the assessment.This is done by providing sufficient comparable sales along with adjustments of those sales to make them relevant to your property.Adjustments include raising or lowering the assessment based upon size of the property, number of bedrooms, bathrooms, age of the kitchen, size of the land and other relevant matters that would influence valuation.In small matters such as a residential appeal where typically a taxpayer is unrepresented by counsel, the Taxpayer is going unarmed against a professional in the form of the local tax assessor.The more information you can provide to the Court, the better equipped you will be to overcome the presumption of validity and be permitted to prove your case.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
