A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently heard arguments on whether to reverse the convictions of two hedge fund managers.
Todd Newman, a portfolio manager at Diamondback Capital Management, and Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors, were convicted of insider trading. The two hedge fund managers made millions of dollars trading on inside information in Dell Computer and Nvidia. They knew that the information came from company employees who breached their obligations to their employers in exchange for “things of value.”
The managers’ attorney described them as “remote tippees,” meaning they did not receive the information from the original sources. However, the evidence showed they wanted assurance that the tips came from insiders in a position to provide reliable information. The tips proved to be worthwhile, as demonstrated by the shares moving when the information became public.
Newman and Chiasson’s appeal was based on the fact that the federal district court judge refused to instruct the jury that they could not be convicted unless they knew the employees leaking the information had received a benefit when they violated their duty to their companies by providing the information.
The appellate panel focused on the Supreme Court holdings that trading on inside information is legal unless it is obtained from an individual who violates a duty to keep it confidential and receives something of value in return for the information.
Judge Barrington D. Parker promoted the need for a “bright line” to enable hedge fund managers to know whether they were violating the law when they traded on inside information. In other words, proving the information came from an insider and the trader was aware of the source will be irrelevant if the trader did not know about the payoff.
This leads to the question of why a hedge fund manager would ever want to know about the payoff? As long as the tip is reliable, the rest doesn’t matter to him/her. Additionally, the standard for meeting the “something of value” requirement is extremely low. Even friendship has been deemed sufficient.
In short, if the court overturns the convictions of Mr. Newman and Mr. Chiasson, it will make it difficult for prosecutors to ever win convictions. The message to traders will be to never discuss or be aware of the payoffs to sources.
If you have any questions about insider trading or would like to discussother corporate, securities and investment banking matters, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will There be a New Loophole For Insider Trading?
Author: Dan Brecher
Insider trading laws may soon undergo changes that will allow creative professionals to avoid liability, even if they are caught.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently heard arguments on whether to reverse the convictions of two hedge fund managers.
Todd Newman, a portfolio manager at Diamondback Capital Management, and Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors, were convicted of insider trading. The two hedge fund managers made millions of dollars trading on inside information in Dell Computer and Nvidia. They knew that the information came from company employees who breached their obligations to their employers in exchange for “things of value.”
The managers’ attorney described them as “remote tippees,” meaning they did not receive the information from the original sources. However, the evidence showed they wanted assurance that the tips came from insiders in a position to provide reliable information. The tips proved to be worthwhile, as demonstrated by the shares moving when the information became public.
Newman and Chiasson’s appeal was based on the fact that the federal district court judge refused to instruct the jury that they could not be convicted unless they knew the employees leaking the information had received a benefit when they violated their duty to their companies by providing the information.
The appellate panel focused on the Supreme Court holdings that trading on inside information is legal unless it is obtained from an individual who violates a duty to keep it confidential and receives something of value in return for the information.
Judge Barrington D. Parker promoted the need for a “bright line” to enable hedge fund managers to know whether they were violating the law when they traded on inside information. In other words, proving the information came from an insider and the trader was aware of the source will be irrelevant if the trader did not know about the payoff.
This leads to the question of why a hedge fund manager would ever want to know about the payoff? As long as the tip is reliable, the rest doesn’t matter to him/her. Additionally, the standard for meeting the “something of value” requirement is extremely low. Even friendship has been deemed sufficient.
In short, if the court overturns the convictions of Mr. Newman and Mr. Chiasson, it will make it difficult for prosecutors to ever win convictions. The message to traders will be to never discuss or be aware of the payoffs to sources.
If you have any questions about insider trading or would like to discussother corporate, securities and investment banking matters, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
