When Negotiating an LPA, Waterfall Distribution Schedules Are Becoming An Increasingly Important Topic
The private equity industry has grown significantly in recent years. PE firms had a record $2.49 trillion in assets as of December 31, 2016. In total, 319 new firms launched last year.
Most private equity funds are structured as a limited partnership, under which the general partners (GPs) are authorized to manage the PE fund and select investments to be included in the fund’s portfolios. Investors, which may include both institutions and wealthy individuals, are limited partners (LPs), which do not participate in investment decisions.
When negotiating an LPA, waterfall distribution schedules are also an increasingly important topic. In general, distribution waterfalls establish the method by which the capital gained by the fund’s sale of the underlying investments is allocated between GPs and LPs. Typically, GPs do not receive an allocation of profits until investors receive their initial investment and a preferred return. Below is an example of a waterfall distribution schedule:
Tier One: All of the distributions are allocated to the investors until all of their initial capital is returned.
Tier Two: Also known as the “hurdle,” all additional distributions go to the investors until they obtain their “preferred” return rate (often between seven and eight percent).
Tier Three: Also known as the “catch-up” tier, the full distribution is allocated to the GP until it receives an established percentage of the profits (often around 20 percent).
Tier Four: The GP then receives a specified percentage (the same as used to calculate Tier Three distributions) of the distributions as carried interest.
The hurdle rate may also be further broken down into tiers, which are tied to the total amount of carried interest of the GPs.
European vs. American Waterfalls in PE Funds
After negotiating the basic terms, such as the hurdle and catch-up, the parties to an LPA must decide how the carried interest will be distributed. Waterfalls can be broadly termed as either “European-style” and “American- style.”
Under a European (or international) style waterfall, the distribution schedule is applied at an aggregate fund level. Accordingly, the GP does not receive carried interest distributions until the investors receive distributions equal to their total capital contributions to the entire fund as well as a preferred return.
In contrast, the American style applies the schedule on a deal-by-deal basis rather than at the fund level. That means returns are calculated for each investment, and GP receives its carried interest as profits are realized on the specific investment.
The whole-fund European model is preferable to investors because it defers distributions of carried interest to GPs, thereby allowing investors to receive more distributions of fund profits sooner. The American waterfall style is more advantageous for GPs of the fund because it distributes the total risk over all the deals.
As the name suggests, the European waterfall is frequently used by private equity funds in Europe and Asia. However, investors in the United States are increasingly seeking to adopt this approach. In response to investors increasingly seeking thresholds set at the fund level, GPs are proposing alternatives, such as deal-specific thresholds that include interim claw-back provisions. The result of this trend is that negotiating the waterfall distribution schedule is even more important. We encourage both investors and GPs to carefully review these terms and discuss their implications with experienced counsel.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Private Equity Trends: Negotiating Waterfall Distribution Schedules
Author: Dan Brecher
When Negotiating an LPA, Waterfall Distribution Schedules Are Becoming An Increasingly Important Topic
The private equity industry has grown significantly in recent years. PE firms had a record $2.49 trillion in assets as of December 31, 2016. In total, 319 new firms launched last year.
Most private equity funds are structured as a limited partnership, under which the general partners (GPs) are authorized to manage the PE fund and select investments to be included in the fund’s portfolios. Investors, which may include both institutions and wealthy individuals, are limited partners (LPs), which do not participate in investment decisions.
When negotiating an LPA, waterfall distribution schedules are also an increasingly important topic. In general, distribution waterfalls establish the method by which the capital gained by the fund’s sale of the underlying investments is allocated between GPs and LPs. Typically, GPs do not receive an allocation of profits until investors receive their initial investment and a preferred return. Below is an example of a waterfall distribution schedule:
Tier One: All of the distributions are allocated to the investors until all of their initial capital is returned.
Tier Two: Also known as the “hurdle,” all additional distributions go to the investors until they obtain their “preferred” return rate (often between seven and eight percent).
Tier Three: Also known as the “catch-up” tier, the full distribution is allocated to the GP until it receives an established percentage of the profits (often around 20 percent).
Tier Four: The GP then receives a specified percentage (the same as used to calculate Tier Three distributions) of the distributions as carried interest.
The hurdle rate may also be further broken down into tiers, which are tied to the total amount of carried interest of the GPs.
European vs. American Waterfalls in PE Funds
After negotiating the basic terms, such as the hurdle and catch-up, the parties to an LPA must decide how the carried interest will be distributed. Waterfalls can be broadly termed as either “European-style” and “American- style.”
Under a European (or international) style waterfall, the distribution schedule is applied at an aggregate fund level. Accordingly, the GP does not receive carried interest distributions until the investors receive distributions equal to their total capital contributions to the entire fund as well as a preferred return.
In contrast, the American style applies the schedule on a deal-by-deal basis rather than at the fund level. That means returns are calculated for each investment, and GP receives its carried interest as profits are realized on the specific investment.
The whole-fund European model is preferable to investors because it defers distributions of carried interest to GPs, thereby allowing investors to receive more distributions of fund profits sooner. The American waterfall style is more advantageous for GPs of the fund because it distributes the total risk over all the deals.
As the name suggests, the European waterfall is frequently used by private equity funds in Europe and Asia. However, investors in the United States are increasingly seeking to adopt this approach. In response to investors increasingly seeking thresholds set at the fund level, GPs are proposing alternatives, such as deal-specific thresholds that include interim claw-back provisions. The result of this trend is that negotiating the waterfall distribution schedule is even more important. We encourage both investors and GPs to carefully review these terms and discuss their implications with experienced counsel.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
