The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently addressed whether the homeowners association and management company of a common-interest community had the duty to clear snow and ice from the community’s private sidewalks or in short, sidewalk liability. According to the justices’ opinion in Qian v. Toll Brothers, the answer is yes.
Plaintiff Cuiyun Qian filed a personal injury suit against Toll Brothers, Inc., Integra Management Corp. (Management Company of Integra), The Villas at Cranbury Brook Homeowners Association (Homeowners Association), and Landscape Maintenance Services, Inc. (Landscape Inc.). She alleged that the defendants failed to maintain a common-area sidewalk on the grounds of The Villas at Cranbury Brook (Villas), causing her to slip and fall on ice.
The Villas is an “over 55,” age-restricted, common-interest community, consisting of approximately 102 detached single-family homes on 32.5 acres of land. Homeowners at the Villas take title only to their dwelling units, while all other areas are common property owned by the Homeowners Association and Recreation Association. Under the community’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws, the Homeowners Association has sidewalk liability – they are responsible for the maintenance of the common elements, which include the sidewalks.
The legal background of sidewalk liability
Under New Jersey common law, commercial landowners have a legal obligation to clear public sidewalks abutting their properties of snow and ice for the safe travel of pedestrians. The law does not impose a similar duty on residential landowners.
In Luchejko v. City of Hoboken, 207 N.J. 191, 211 (2011), the New Jersey Supreme Court relied on the distinction in holding that a condominium association and management company were immune from suit for allegedly failing to clear ice from a public sidewalk abutting a residential condominium building. In this case, the trial court and the Appellate Division cited Luchejko in finding the sidewalk at issue was “public” and that the defendants were similarly immune from suit.
The Court’s decision
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed. It held that residential public-sidewalk immunity does not apply in the case of a sidewalk privately owned by a common-interest community.
“Who owns or controls the sidewalk, not who uses it, is the key distinguishing point between a public and private sidewalk. Here, the by-laws of the homeowners association spell out the association’s duty to manage and maintain the community’s common areas, including sidewalks,” Justice Barry Albin explained.
The court further noted that the homeowners association also has a statutory obligation pursuant to Condominium Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8B-14(a), to manage the common elements of which the sidewalks are a part. The statute further requires homeowners’ associations to maintain liability insurance. “Clearly, the Legislature believed that the private sidewalks of a common-interest community were subject to tort liability,” Justice Albin stated.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
NJ Supreme Court Addresses Sidewalk Liability of Homeowners Association
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently addressed whether the homeowners association and management company of a common-interest community had the duty to clear snow and ice from the community’s private sidewalks or in short, sidewalk liability. According to the justices’ opinion in Qian v. Toll Brothers, the answer is yes.
Plaintiff Cuiyun Qian filed a personal injury suit against Toll Brothers, Inc., Integra Management Corp. (Management Company of Integra), The Villas at Cranbury Brook Homeowners Association (Homeowners Association), and Landscape Maintenance Services, Inc. (Landscape Inc.). She alleged that the defendants failed to maintain a common-area sidewalk on the grounds of The Villas at Cranbury Brook (Villas), causing her to slip and fall on ice.
The Villas is an “over 55,” age-restricted, common-interest community, consisting of approximately 102 detached single-family homes on 32.5 acres of land. Homeowners at the Villas take title only to their dwelling units, while all other areas are common property owned by the Homeowners Association and Recreation Association. Under the community’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws, the Homeowners Association has sidewalk liability – they are responsible for the maintenance of the common elements, which include the sidewalks.
The legal background of sidewalk liability
Under New Jersey common law, commercial landowners have a legal obligation to clear public sidewalks abutting their properties of snow and ice for the safe travel of pedestrians. The law does not impose a similar duty on residential landowners.
In Luchejko v. City of Hoboken, 207 N.J. 191, 211 (2011), the New Jersey Supreme Court relied on the distinction in holding that a condominium association and management company were immune from suit for allegedly failing to clear ice from a public sidewalk abutting a residential condominium building. In this case, the trial court and the Appellate Division cited Luchejko in finding the sidewalk at issue was “public” and that the defendants were similarly immune from suit.
The Court’s decision
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed. It held that residential public-sidewalk immunity does not apply in the case of a sidewalk privately owned by a common-interest community.
“Who owns or controls the sidewalk, not who uses it, is the key distinguishing point between a public and private sidewalk. Here, the by-laws of the homeowners association spell out the association’s duty to manage and maintain the community’s common areas, including sidewalks,” Justice Barry Albin explained.
The court further noted that the homeowners association also has a statutory obligation pursuant to Condominium Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8B-14(a), to manage the common elements of which the sidewalks are a part. The statute further requires homeowners’ associations to maintain liability insurance. “Clearly, the Legislature believed that the private sidewalks of a common-interest community were subject to tort liability,” Justice Albin stated.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
