Jay Clayton, the New Chair of the SEC, Outlined the Agency’s Top Priorities in Speech
Jay Clayton, the new chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), outlined his agenda in a recent speech before the Economic Club of New York, which were among Clayton’s first public remarks as the head of the SEC provide insight into his regulatory philosophy.
The SEC’s historic approach to regulation is sound: While this principle wouldn’t normally make waves, it is significant given the Trump Administration’s focus on deregulation. “I believe in the regulatory architecture that has governed the securities markets since 1933,” Clayton stated. “It is abundantly clear that wholesale changes to the Commission’s fundamental regulatory approach would not make sense.”
Regulatory actions drive change, and change can have lasting effects: Clayton emphasized that incremental regulatory changes may not seem individually significant, but, in the aggregate, they can dramatically affect the markets. Clayton stated that the public company disclosure system “has worked so well that we — not just the SEC, but lawmakers and other regulators — have slowly but significantly expanded the scope of required disclosures beyond the core concept of materiality.” He added: “Those actions have been justified by regulators and lawmakers alike, often based on discrete, direct and indirect benefits to specific shareholders or other constituencies. And it has often been concluded that these benefits outweigh the marginal costs that are spread over a broad shareholder base.” In support of his belief that analysis should be cumulative as well as incremental, Clayton cited the 50 percent decline in the total number of U.S.-listed public companies over the last two decades. He also noted that studies show the median word-count for SEC filings has more than doubled, yet readability of those documents is at an all-time low.
As markets evolve, so must the SEC: Clayton highlighted the increasing role of technology, both for the SEC and those under its purview. Clayton specifically stated that the SEC must be mindful that implementing regulatory change has costs. “Companies spend significant resources building systems of compliance, hiring personnel to operate those systems, seeking legal advice concerning the design and effectiveness of those systems, and adapting the systems as regulations change,” Clayton stated. “Shareholders and customers bear these costs, which is something that should not be taken lightly, lest we lose our credibility as regulators.”
Effective rulemaking does not end with rule adoption. Clayton believes that the SEC should review its rules retrospectively, “We should listen to investors and others about where rules are, or are not, functioning as intended. We cannot be shy about being introspective and self-critical,” he said.
The costs of a rule now often include the cost of demonstrating compliance: “Rules are meant to be followed, and the public depends on regulators to make sure that happens,” Clayton said. “It is incumbent on the Commission to write rules so that those subject to them can ascertain how to comply and—now more than ever—how to demonstrate that compliance. Vaguely worded rules can too easily lead to subpar compliance solutions or an over-investment in control systems. We must recognize practical costs that are sure to arise.”
SEC Initiatives Going Forward
Clayton also discussed several initiatives that the SEC plans to pursue in the near term. He first addressed enforcement and examinations, emphasizing that he “fully intend[s] to continue deploying significant resources to root out fraud and shady practices in the markets, particularly in areas where Main Street investors are most exposed.” He specifically referenced affinity fraud, microcap fraud, pump-and-dump scammers, those who prey on retirees, and “increasingly, those who use new technologies to lie, cheat, and steal.”
“Turning to the more sophisticated participants in our markets, the Commission will continue to use its enforcement and examination authority to support market integrity,” Clayton stated. “Market professionals have a special place in our economy, do not take unfair advantage of it.”
Jay Clayton on Capital Formation & Regulatory Compliance
Regarding capital formation, Clayton acknowledged that successful companies are increasingly electing to stay private. Accordingly, the SEC’s new chair stated that he hopes “to increase the attractiveness of our public capital markets without adversely affecting the availability of capital from our private markets.”
As for the burdens of regulatory compliance, Clayton highlighted the extension of the non-public review process to all IPO draft registration statements. He also issued the following reminder:
There are circumstances in which the Commission’s reporting rules may require publicly traded companies to make disclosures that are burdensome to generate, but may not be material to the total mix of information available to investors. Under Rule 3-13 of Regulation S-X, issuers can request modifications to their financial reporting requirements in these situations. I want to encourage companies to consider whether such modifications may be helpful in connection with their capital raising activities and assure you that SEC staff is placing a high priority on responding with timely guidance.
Notably, Clayton did not ignore the controversy surrounding the fiduciary rule, for which he had already sought public comments from retail investors and other interested parties. “With the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule now partially in effect, it is important that the Commission make all reasonable efforts to bring clarity and consistency to this area,” he said. “It is my hope that we can act in concert with our colleagues at the Department of Labor in a way that best serves the long-term interests of Mr. and Ms. 401(k).” Further, in subsequent comments before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, he indicated that he wanted to find “common ground” with the Labor Department’s rule requiring brokers who give investment advice to put their client’s interest ahead of their own potential commissions.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Jeffrey Cassin, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New SEC Chair Jay Clayton Outlines Agency’s Top Priorities
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Jay Clayton, the New Chair of the SEC, Outlined the Agency’s Top Priorities in Speech
Jay Clayton, the new chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), outlined his agenda in a recent speech before the Economic Club of New York, which were among Clayton’s first public remarks as the head of the SEC provide insight into his regulatory philosophy.
The SEC’s historic approach to regulation is sound: While this principle wouldn’t normally make waves, it is significant given the Trump Administration’s focus on deregulation. “I believe in the regulatory architecture that has governed the securities markets since 1933,” Clayton stated. “It is abundantly clear that wholesale changes to the Commission’s fundamental regulatory approach would not make sense.”
Regulatory actions drive change, and change can have lasting effects: Clayton emphasized that incremental regulatory changes may not seem individually significant, but, in the aggregate, they can dramatically affect the markets. Clayton stated that the public company disclosure system “has worked so well that we — not just the SEC, but lawmakers and other regulators — have slowly but significantly expanded the scope of required disclosures beyond the core concept of materiality.” He added: “Those actions have been justified by regulators and lawmakers alike, often based on discrete, direct and indirect benefits to specific shareholders or other constituencies. And it has often been concluded that these benefits outweigh the marginal costs that are spread over a broad shareholder base.” In support of his belief that analysis should be cumulative as well as incremental, Clayton cited the 50 percent decline in the total number of U.S.-listed public companies over the last two decades. He also noted that studies show the median word-count for SEC filings has more than doubled, yet readability of those documents is at an all-time low.
As markets evolve, so must the SEC: Clayton highlighted the increasing role of technology, both for the SEC and those under its purview. Clayton specifically stated that the SEC must be mindful that implementing regulatory change has costs. “Companies spend significant resources building systems of compliance, hiring personnel to operate those systems, seeking legal advice concerning the design and effectiveness of those systems, and adapting the systems as regulations change,” Clayton stated. “Shareholders and customers bear these costs, which is something that should not be taken lightly, lest we lose our credibility as regulators.”
Effective rulemaking does not end with rule adoption. Clayton believes that the SEC should review its rules retrospectively, “We should listen to investors and others about where rules are, or are not, functioning as intended. We cannot be shy about being introspective and self-critical,” he said.
The costs of a rule now often include the cost of demonstrating compliance: “Rules are meant to be followed, and the public depends on regulators to make sure that happens,” Clayton said. “It is incumbent on the Commission to write rules so that those subject to them can ascertain how to comply and—now more than ever—how to demonstrate that compliance. Vaguely worded rules can too easily lead to subpar compliance solutions or an over-investment in control systems. We must recognize practical costs that are sure to arise.”
SEC Initiatives Going Forward
Clayton also discussed several initiatives that the SEC plans to pursue in the near term. He first addressed enforcement and examinations, emphasizing that he “fully intend[s] to continue deploying significant resources to root out fraud and shady practices in the markets, particularly in areas where Main Street investors are most exposed.” He specifically referenced affinity fraud, microcap fraud, pump-and-dump scammers, those who prey on retirees, and “increasingly, those who use new technologies to lie, cheat, and steal.”
“Turning to the more sophisticated participants in our markets, the Commission will continue to use its enforcement and examination authority to support market integrity,” Clayton stated. “Market professionals have a special place in our economy, do not take unfair advantage of it.”
Jay Clayton on Capital Formation & Regulatory Compliance
Regarding capital formation, Clayton acknowledged that successful companies are increasingly electing to stay private. Accordingly, the SEC’s new chair stated that he hopes “to increase the attractiveness of our public capital markets without adversely affecting the availability of capital from our private markets.”
As for the burdens of regulatory compliance, Clayton highlighted the extension of the non-public review process to all IPO draft registration statements. He also issued the following reminder:
There are circumstances in which the Commission’s reporting rules may require publicly traded companies to make disclosures that are burdensome to generate, but may not be material to the total mix of information available to investors. Under Rule 3-13 of Regulation S-X, issuers can request modifications to their financial reporting requirements in these situations. I want to encourage companies to consider whether such modifications may be helpful in connection with their capital raising activities and assure you that SEC staff is placing a high priority on responding with timely guidance.
Notably, Clayton did not ignore the controversy surrounding the fiduciary rule, for which he had already sought public comments from retail investors and other interested parties. “With the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule now partially in effect, it is important that the Commission make all reasonable efforts to bring clarity and consistency to this area,” he said. “It is my hope that we can act in concert with our colleagues at the Department of Labor in a way that best serves the long-term interests of Mr. and Ms. 401(k).” Further, in subsequent comments before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, he indicated that he wanted to find “common ground” with the Labor Department’s rule requiring brokers who give investment advice to put their client’s interest ahead of their own potential commissions.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Jeffrey Cassin, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
