SEC Enforcement Actions Against Public Companies & Subsidiaries Decreased By 33% In the Fiscal Year 2017
With the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) appearing to be focusing more intensely on public company report filings and on misdeeds of investment advisors, other aspects of the securities markets are now receiving less attention under the Trump Administration, according to a new report. It found that new enforcement actions against public companies and subsidiaries decreased by 33 percent in the fiscal year 2017 compared to the prior fiscal year.
The report, “SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries, Fiscal Year 2017 Update,” relies on data from the Securities Enforcement Empirical Database (SEED), a collaboration between the NYU Pollack Center for Law & Business and Cornerstone Research. According to the report, the three-year trend of increasing enforcement reversed sharply in the second half of FY 2017.
According to co-author David Marcus, while the declines “coincide with the change in SEC leadership,” it is “too early to tell if this [enforcement lull] is a trend under the new leadership, or just due to the transition period.” Below are several other key findings with regard to SEC enforcement activity in 2017:
There were 45 actions filed against public company-related defendants in the first half of FY 2017 and only 17 actions filed in the second half, which represents the largest semiannual decrease within a fiscal year since SEED began tracking data (FY 2010).
Total monetary settlements against public company-related defendants also declined sharply from the first half of FY 2017 to the second half, from $1 billion to $196 million.
Penalties in the second half of FY 2017 accounted for only 16 percent of total settlements for the fiscal year— the lowest percentage (and dollar amount) for any six-month period since SEED began tracking data in 2010.
In the first half of FY 2017, 63 percent of public company-related defendants cooperated with the SEC, while only 32 percent cooperated in the second half.
The SEC continued to focus on Issuer Reporting and Disclosure allegations in FY 2017.3 At 39 percent, it was the most frequent allegation type against public company-related defendants.
Investment Advisor/Investment Companies allegations were the most frequent type in the second half of FY 2017, which is consistent with SEC Chair Jay Clayton’s stated goals.
A total of 10 actions involving FCPA allegations were filed in FY 2017. Since February 2017, however, only two actions with FCPA allegations have been filed against public company–related defendants
While the new report is certainly good news for investment firms and other entities regulated by the SEC, it does not mean that SEC compliance should take a back seat. The SEC is not necessarily being less vigilant, but rather is shifting both resources and priorities under the new administration.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
SEC Enforcement Actions Sharply Declined
Author: Dan Brecher
SEC Enforcement Actions Against Public Companies & Subsidiaries Decreased By 33% In the Fiscal Year 2017
With the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) appearing to be focusing more intensely on public company report filings and on misdeeds of investment advisors, other aspects of the securities markets are now receiving less attention under the Trump Administration, according to a new report. It found that new enforcement actions against public companies and subsidiaries decreased by 33 percent in the fiscal year 2017 compared to the prior fiscal year.
The report, “SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries, Fiscal Year 2017 Update,” relies on data from the Securities Enforcement Empirical Database (SEED), a collaboration between the NYU Pollack Center for Law & Business and Cornerstone Research. According to the report, the three-year trend of increasing enforcement reversed sharply in the second half of FY 2017.
According to co-author David Marcus, while the declines “coincide with the change in SEC leadership,” it is “too early to tell if this [enforcement lull] is a trend under the new leadership, or just due to the transition period.” Below are several other key findings with regard to SEC enforcement activity in 2017:
There were 45 actions filed against public company-related defendants in the first half of FY 2017 and only 17 actions filed in the second half, which represents the largest semiannual decrease within a fiscal year since SEED began tracking data (FY 2010).
Total monetary settlements against public company-related defendants also declined sharply from the first half of FY 2017 to the second half, from $1 billion to $196 million.
Penalties in the second half of FY 2017 accounted for only 16 percent of total settlements for the fiscal year— the lowest percentage (and dollar amount) for any six-month period since SEED began tracking data in 2010.
In the first half of FY 2017, 63 percent of public company-related defendants cooperated with the SEC, while only 32 percent cooperated in the second half.
The SEC continued to focus on Issuer Reporting and Disclosure allegations in FY 2017.3 At 39 percent, it was the most frequent allegation type against public company-related defendants.
Investment Advisor/Investment Companies allegations were the most frequent type in the second half of FY 2017, which is consistent with SEC Chair Jay Clayton’s stated goals.
A total of 10 actions involving FCPA allegations were filed in FY 2017. Since February 2017, however, only two actions with FCPA allegations have been filed against public company–related defendants
While the new report is certainly good news for investment firms and other entities regulated by the SEC, it does not mean that SEC compliance should take a back seat. The SEC is not necessarily being less vigilant, but rather is shifting both resources and priorities under the new administration.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
