Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
SEC Blows the Whistle on Confidentiality Agreements – Are You Next?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 14, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently filed its first enforcement action alleging that a company improperly used confidentiality agreements to deter whistleblowing.
The action highlights that securities regulators are taking a much closer look at how companies use non-disclosure provisions in their confidentiality agreements with employees.
Late last year, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a regulatory notice regarding the use of confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements. It specifically highlighted that FINRA Rule 2010 prohibits provisions that restrict or preclude a customer or any other person from communicating with the SEC, FINRA, or any federal or state regulatory authority regarding a possible securities law violation.
As highlighted by the recent enforcement action, confidentiality agreements are also on the SEC’s radar. The agency alleged that Houston-based global technology and engineering firm KBR Inc. violated the whistleblower protection Rule 21F-17, which was enacted under the Dodd-Frank Act, by requiring witnesses in internal investigations regarding possible securities law violations to sign confidentiality agreements.
Although the SEC did not allege that KBR specifically prevented employees from communicating with the SEC about specific securities law violations, it maintained that the company’s blanket prohibition against witnesses discussing the substance of their interviews with outside parties without prior company approval “has a potential chilling effect on whistleblowers’ willingness to report illegal conduct to the SEC.”
KBR agreed to pay a $130,000 penalty to resolve the SEC’s charges In addition, KBR voluntarily added the following language to its confidentiality statement in order to bring it into compliance:
Nothing in this Confidentiality Statement prohibits me from reporting possible violations of federal law or regulation to any governmental agency or entity, including but not limited to the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Congress, and any agency Inspector General, or making other disclosures that are protected under the whistleblower provisions of federal law or regulation. I do not need the prior authorization of the Law Department to make any such reports or disclosures and I am not required to notify the company that I have made such reports or disclosures.
In a press statement announcing the settlement, the SEC advised that all employers should “similarly review and amend existing and historical agreements that in word or effect stop their employees from reporting potential violations to the SEC.”
- Practices: Securities Litigation & FINRA Arbitrations
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
SEC Blows the Whistle on Confidentiality Agreements – Are You Next?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently filed its first enforcement action alleging that a company improperly used confidentiality agreements to deter whistleblowing.
The action highlights that securities regulators are taking a much closer look at how companies use non-disclosure provisions in their confidentiality agreements with employees.
Late last year, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a regulatory notice regarding the use of confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements. It specifically highlighted that FINRA Rule 2010 prohibits provisions that restrict or preclude a customer or any other person from communicating with the SEC, FINRA, or any federal or state regulatory authority regarding a possible securities law violation.
As highlighted by the recent enforcement action, confidentiality agreements are also on the SEC’s radar. The agency alleged that Houston-based global technology and engineering firm KBR Inc. violated the whistleblower protection Rule 21F-17, which was enacted under the Dodd-Frank Act, by requiring witnesses in internal investigations regarding possible securities law violations to sign confidentiality agreements.
Although the SEC did not allege that KBR specifically prevented employees from communicating with the SEC about specific securities law violations, it maintained that the company’s blanket prohibition against witnesses discussing the substance of their interviews with outside parties without prior company approval “has a potential chilling effect on whistleblowers’ willingness to report illegal conduct to the SEC.”
KBR agreed to pay a $130,000 penalty to resolve the SEC’s charges In addition, KBR voluntarily added the following language to its confidentiality statement in order to bring it into compliance:
Nothing in this Confidentiality Statement prohibits me from reporting possible violations of federal law or regulation to any governmental agency or entity, including but not limited to the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Congress, and any agency Inspector General, or making other disclosures that are protected under the whistleblower provisions of federal law or regulation. I do not need the prior authorization of the Law Department to make any such reports or disclosures and I am not required to notify the company that I have made such reports or disclosures.
In a press statement announcing the settlement, the SEC advised that all employers should “similarly review and amend existing and historical agreements that in word or effect stop their employees from reporting potential violations to the SEC.”