
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comIn regards to the 2015 exam priorities, the report should be required reading for all investment professionals under the agency’s purview, most notably investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents.
“We share our 2015 examination priorities to promote compliance,” said Andrew J. Bowden, Director of the agency’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE). “We have observed that when we share our areas of focus, many industry participants independently review their controls in the areas we have identified.”
According to the SEC, its specific priorities revolve around three areas: protecting retail investors, especially those saving for or in retirement; assessing market-wide risks; and using data analytics to identify signs of potential illegal activity. Below are specific issues that the OCIE identified in its report:
Examiners will continue to target newly registered municipal advisors to assess their compliance with recently adopted SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board rules. Similarly, the SEC will also continue its efforts to examine selected registered investment companies that have not yet been examined.
Citing the high rate of deficiencies that it has observed among advisers to private equity funds in connection with fees and expenses, the SEC plans to continue to conduct examinations in this area.
The agency plans to monitor the largest U.S. broker-dealers and asset managers for the purpose of assessing risks at individual firms and maintaining early awareness of developments industry-wide.
The SEC expects to continue and expand its initiative to examine broker-dealers’ and investment advisers’ cybersecurity compliance and controls.
The SEC will scrutinize the supervision of registered representatives and financial adviser representatives in branch offices, including using data analytics to identify branches that may be deviating from compliance practices of the firm’s home office.
The SEC intends to evaluate registered firms’ recommendations or determinations to invest retirement assets into complex or structured products and higher yield securities, including whether the due diligence conducted, the disclosures made, and the suitability of the recommendations or determinations are consistent with existing legal requirements.
For advisers that offer a range of fee structures, the SEC will evaluate the recommendations of account types and whether they are in the best interest of the client at the inception of the arrangement and thereafter, including fees charged, services provided, and disclosures made about such relationships.
The SEC intends to allocate more resources to examine transfer agents, particularly those that are involved with microcap securities and private offerings.
The agency plans to use its growing capabilities to pursue initiatives involving microcap fraud, excessive trading, anti-money laundering programs, and recidivist brokers.
Despite a stated lack of resources, the SEC is still working to prove that it can handle the growing task of examining financial advisers as well as preventing securities fraud before it harms investors. Accordingly, registered firms should be prepared to face a heightened enforcement environment for the foreseeable future.
Are you on top of the 2015 exam priorities? What was your experience? Feel free to leave a comment in the section below.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
In regards to the 2015 exam priorities, the report should be required reading for all investment professionals under the agency’s purview, most notably investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents.
“We share our 2015 examination priorities to promote compliance,” said Andrew J. Bowden, Director of the agency’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE). “We have observed that when we share our areas of focus, many industry participants independently review their controls in the areas we have identified.”
According to the SEC, its specific priorities revolve around three areas: protecting retail investors, especially those saving for or in retirement; assessing market-wide risks; and using data analytics to identify signs of potential illegal activity. Below are specific issues that the OCIE identified in its report:
Examiners will continue to target newly registered municipal advisors to assess their compliance with recently adopted SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board rules. Similarly, the SEC will also continue its efforts to examine selected registered investment companies that have not yet been examined.
Citing the high rate of deficiencies that it has observed among advisers to private equity funds in connection with fees and expenses, the SEC plans to continue to conduct examinations in this area.
The agency plans to monitor the largest U.S. broker-dealers and asset managers for the purpose of assessing risks at individual firms and maintaining early awareness of developments industry-wide.
The SEC expects to continue and expand its initiative to examine broker-dealers’ and investment advisers’ cybersecurity compliance and controls.
The SEC will scrutinize the supervision of registered representatives and financial adviser representatives in branch offices, including using data analytics to identify branches that may be deviating from compliance practices of the firm’s home office.
The SEC intends to evaluate registered firms’ recommendations or determinations to invest retirement assets into complex or structured products and higher yield securities, including whether the due diligence conducted, the disclosures made, and the suitability of the recommendations or determinations are consistent with existing legal requirements.
For advisers that offer a range of fee structures, the SEC will evaluate the recommendations of account types and whether they are in the best interest of the client at the inception of the arrangement and thereafter, including fees charged, services provided, and disclosures made about such relationships.
The SEC intends to allocate more resources to examine transfer agents, particularly those that are involved with microcap securities and private offerings.
The agency plans to use its growing capabilities to pursue initiatives involving microcap fraud, excessive trading, anti-money laundering programs, and recidivist brokers.
Despite a stated lack of resources, the SEC is still working to prove that it can handle the growing task of examining financial advisers as well as preventing securities fraud before it harms investors. Accordingly, registered firms should be prepared to face a heightened enforcement environment for the foreseeable future.
Are you on top of the 2015 exam priorities? What was your experience? Feel free to leave a comment in the section below.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!