Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
SAC Capital Advisors Settles Insider Trading Charges in Record Settlement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Department of Justice recently announced a landmark settlement involving SAC Capital Advisors. The firm, which was once the world’s most powerful and successful players in the hedge fund industry, has agreed to pay nearly $1.8 billion in penalties to resolve allegations of insider trading.
According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, the company agreed to plead guilty to all of the criminal counts and will cease its investment adviser operations. While SAC cannot accept any additional funds from outside investors, it will be permitted to continue to manage the funds of its founder, Steven A. Cohen.
“The government believes that the proposed global resolution is fair, reasonable, and firmly promotes the interests of justice, deterrence and respect for the law. The aggregate $1.8 billion is – to the Government’s knowledge – the largest financial penalty in history for insider trading offenses,” prosecutors stated in court documents.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also stepped up enforcement of insider trading. SAC Capital previously agreed to pay $616 million to settle a parallel civil action, which will now be deducted from the $1.8 billion total in fines and forfeiture.
While SAC Capital can now put the insider trading scandal in the rear view, Cohen still a number of legal headaches. The settlement does not prohibit the government from continuing its criminal and civil investigations into Cohen’s role in the trading schemes. The agreement expressly states that it “provides no immunity from prosecution to any individual.”
Given the intense scrutiny on insider trading by both the DOJ and the SEC, firms should ensure that they have comprehensive policies and procedures in place to monitor trading compliance. While corporations don’t serve jail time, criminal penalties for compliance oversights can be extremely costly.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
SAC Capital Advisors Settles Insider Trading Charges in Record Settlement
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Department of Justice recently announced a landmark settlement involving SAC Capital Advisors. The firm, which was once the world’s most powerful and successful players in the hedge fund industry, has agreed to pay nearly $1.8 billion in penalties to resolve allegations of insider trading.
According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, the company agreed to plead guilty to all of the criminal counts and will cease its investment adviser operations. While SAC cannot accept any additional funds from outside investors, it will be permitted to continue to manage the funds of its founder, Steven A. Cohen.
“The government believes that the proposed global resolution is fair, reasonable, and firmly promotes the interests of justice, deterrence and respect for the law. The aggregate $1.8 billion is – to the Government’s knowledge – the largest financial penalty in history for insider trading offenses,” prosecutors stated in court documents.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also stepped up enforcement of insider trading. SAC Capital previously agreed to pay $616 million to settle a parallel civil action, which will now be deducted from the $1.8 billion total in fines and forfeiture.
While SAC Capital can now put the insider trading scandal in the rear view, Cohen still a number of legal headaches. The settlement does not prohibit the government from continuing its criminal and civil investigations into Cohen’s role in the trading schemes. The agreement expressly states that it “provides no immunity from prosecution to any individual.”
Given the intense scrutiny on insider trading by both the DOJ and the SEC, firms should ensure that they have comprehensive policies and procedures in place to monitor trading compliance. While corporations don’t serve jail time, criminal penalties for compliance oversights can be extremely costly.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.