Unsavory remarks, behavior, and sentiments from television personalities may not constitute a violation of entertainment law, but they can still result in significant career damage, as evidenced by the ongoing Paula Deen racism allegations scandal.
The Southern chef, known for her meals, cookware, and ancillary product lines was recently dropped from the Food Network for racism allegations remarks after holding a top-rated cooking show on the network for more than eight years. The allegations come from employees who worked at several of her restaurants, who claim that African-Americans, women, and other minority groups were often treated unfairly, and overheard Deen use racial slurs during their tenure. Adding to the situation was the release of a court deposition, in which Deen admitted to using racial slurs and off-color jokes in the past.
Although Deen has defended herself against the remarks and made a tearful apology to fans for her “insensitive” jokes, many of her sponsors have already drawn up agreements to end their relationship with the Savannah chef. Smithfield Foods, whose hams and other products Deen has endorsed since 2006, severed its relationship earlier this week. QVC and Kmart, both of which sell Deen-branded homewares, are currently “reviewing their options,” according to the Huffington Post. Most recently, Caesars Entertainment company released a statement saying it had “reached an agreement with Paula Deen Enterprises not to renew the business relationship.” The company plans to re-brand all of its existing Paula Deen-themed restaurants in the coming months, according to USA Today.
Deen has received a barrage of both criticism and support from fans, fellow chefs, and other television personalities. Some have argued that a person’s sentiments and language should not legally impact sponsorship and endorsement deals, as they do not violate any legal statutes. Others have asserted that discriminatory or racists remarks violate ethics clauses and provide companies with a legal basis to dismiss their sponsors.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Deen Loses Contracts Over Racism Allegations
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Unsavory remarks, behavior, and sentiments from television personalities may not constitute a violation of entertainment law, but they can still result in significant career damage, as evidenced by the ongoing Paula Deen racism allegations scandal.
The Southern chef, known for her meals, cookware, and ancillary product lines was recently dropped from the Food Network for racism allegations remarks after holding a top-rated cooking show on the network for more than eight years. The allegations come from employees who worked at several of her restaurants, who claim that African-Americans, women, and other minority groups were often treated unfairly, and overheard Deen use racial slurs during their tenure. Adding to the situation was the release of a court deposition, in which Deen admitted to using racial slurs and off-color jokes in the past.
Although Deen has defended herself against the remarks and made a tearful apology to fans for her “insensitive” jokes, many of her sponsors have already drawn up agreements to end their relationship with the Savannah chef. Smithfield Foods, whose hams and other products Deen has endorsed since 2006, severed its relationship earlier this week. QVC and Kmart, both of which sell Deen-branded homewares, are currently “reviewing their options,” according to the Huffington Post. Most recently, Caesars Entertainment company released a statement saying it had “reached an agreement with Paula Deen Enterprises not to renew the business relationship.” The company plans to re-brand all of its existing Paula Deen-themed restaurants in the coming months, according to USA Today.
Deen has received a barrage of both criticism and support from fans, fellow chefs, and other television personalities. Some have argued that a person’s sentiments and language should not legally impact sponsorship and endorsement deals, as they do not violate any legal statutes. Others have asserted that discriminatory or racists remarks violate ethics clauses and provide companies with a legal basis to dismiss their sponsors.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
