
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: January 16, 2018
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Legislature is moving forward with efforts to invalidate a rule enacted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) earlier this year. The regulation amends the septic system density standards in the Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) and clears the way for continued land development in the environmentally-sensitive region.
In 2004, the New Jersey Legislature passed the New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) to establish a regional land management plan aimed at protecting and preserving the natural resources of the region. Because the Highlands region provides much of the state’s drinking water, the Highlands Act requires the DEP to establish septic density standards at a level that will maintain existing water quality. The Highlands Act specifically requires the DEP’s rules to include “a septic system density standard established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses from individual, secondary, and cumulative impacts, in consideration of deep aquifer recharge available for dilution.”
As explained by the DEP, the agency uses nutrients found in septic waste, called nitrates, to assess water quality. Septic density formulas are based on the acreage of land necessary to dilute nitrates to levels that will not negatively impact water quality. In 2008, the DEP’s septic density standards were set to allow one septic system for every 88 acres of forested area and one septic system for every 25 acres that is not forested.
Last year, the DEP proposed amended septic density standards for the Highlands region. Because they “could result in up to 1,145 additional septic systems, or about 12 percent more individual septic systems than under the existing rule,” the standards have been widely criticized by environmental groups. Nonetheless, the DEP adopted the new standards on April 21, 2017.
New Jersey lawmakers have also criticized the DEP’s Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act Rules, arguing that they violate the legislative intent of the Highlands Act. Accordingly, the Legislature is working to force the DEP to rescind them.
Under the State of New Jersey’s Constitution, the Legislature may review any rule or regulation adopted or proposed by an administrative agency to determine if it is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If lawmakers determine that a rule or regulation violates legislative intent, they can seek to invalidate it.
In June, the Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 192 (1R). The resolution states that “the new standards contained in the May 2, 2016 rule proposal do not comply with the requirement in the Highlands Act for the septic system density standards to be established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses.”
The resolution raises concerns that the DEP relied in part on nitrate data generated from wells sampled between 2004 and 2011, after the date of enactment of the Highlands Act. As set forth in ACR 192, “the proposed standards do not accurately preserve or maintain 2004 water quality conditions or restore water quality, as required by the act, but instead, reflect the development and accompanying degradation in groundwater quality that has occurred since 2004 and allows water quality to continue to degrade.”
The resolution also contends that the DEP’s rule proposal directly contradicts the language of the Highlands Act. It notes DEP’s proposed rule amendments seek to “relate the septic system density standards to the . . . Highlands Regional Master Plan (RMP),” but section 34 of the Highlands Act requires, conversely, that the RMP be based on the DEP’s rules.
After passage by the Legislature, ACR 192 was subsequently filed with the Secretary of State and transmitted to the Commissioner of Environmental Protection. Now that the DEP has declined to rescind or amend the septic density standards, the Legislature must now reapprove the resolution in order for it to take effect.
Under the New Jersey Constitution, the Legislature may invalidate the rule following a public hearing held by either House, the placement of a transcript of the public hearing on the desks of the members of each House in open meeting followed by the passage of at least 20 calendar days, and a vote of a majority of each House in favor of a concurrent resolution invalidating the rule. Most recently, the Senate Environment and Energy Committee voted unanimously in favor of the resolution (SCR-163).
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The New Jersey Legislature is moving forward with efforts to invalidate a rule enacted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) earlier this year. The regulation amends the septic system density standards in the Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) and clears the way for continued land development in the environmentally-sensitive region.
In 2004, the New Jersey Legislature passed the New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act (Highlands Act) to establish a regional land management plan aimed at protecting and preserving the natural resources of the region. Because the Highlands region provides much of the state’s drinking water, the Highlands Act requires the DEP to establish septic density standards at a level that will maintain existing water quality. The Highlands Act specifically requires the DEP’s rules to include “a septic system density standard established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses from individual, secondary, and cumulative impacts, in consideration of deep aquifer recharge available for dilution.”
As explained by the DEP, the agency uses nutrients found in septic waste, called nitrates, to assess water quality. Septic density formulas are based on the acreage of land necessary to dilute nitrates to levels that will not negatively impact water quality. In 2008, the DEP’s septic density standards were set to allow one septic system for every 88 acres of forested area and one septic system for every 25 acres that is not forested.
Last year, the DEP proposed amended septic density standards for the Highlands region. Because they “could result in up to 1,145 additional septic systems, or about 12 percent more individual septic systems than under the existing rule,” the standards have been widely criticized by environmental groups. Nonetheless, the DEP adopted the new standards on April 21, 2017.
New Jersey lawmakers have also criticized the DEP’s Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act Rules, arguing that they violate the legislative intent of the Highlands Act. Accordingly, the Legislature is working to force the DEP to rescind them.
Under the State of New Jersey’s Constitution, the Legislature may review any rule or regulation adopted or proposed by an administrative agency to determine if it is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If lawmakers determine that a rule or regulation violates legislative intent, they can seek to invalidate it.
In June, the Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 192 (1R). The resolution states that “the new standards contained in the May 2, 2016 rule proposal do not comply with the requirement in the Highlands Act for the septic system density standards to be established at a level to prevent the degradation of water quality, or to require the restoration of water quality, and to protect ecological uses.”
The resolution raises concerns that the DEP relied in part on nitrate data generated from wells sampled between 2004 and 2011, after the date of enactment of the Highlands Act. As set forth in ACR 192, “the proposed standards do not accurately preserve or maintain 2004 water quality conditions or restore water quality, as required by the act, but instead, reflect the development and accompanying degradation in groundwater quality that has occurred since 2004 and allows water quality to continue to degrade.”
The resolution also contends that the DEP’s rule proposal directly contradicts the language of the Highlands Act. It notes DEP’s proposed rule amendments seek to “relate the septic system density standards to the . . . Highlands Regional Master Plan (RMP),” but section 34 of the Highlands Act requires, conversely, that the RMP be based on the DEP’s rules.
After passage by the Legislature, ACR 192 was subsequently filed with the Secretary of State and transmitted to the Commissioner of Environmental Protection. Now that the DEP has declined to rescind or amend the septic density standards, the Legislature must now reapprove the resolution in order for it to take effect.
Under the New Jersey Constitution, the Legislature may invalidate the rule following a public hearing held by either House, the placement of a transcript of the public hearing on the desks of the members of each House in open meeting followed by the passage of at least 20 calendar days, and a vote of a majority of each House in favor of a concurrent resolution invalidating the rule. Most recently, the Senate Environment and Energy Committee voted unanimously in favor of the resolution (SCR-163).
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!