New Legislation May Make it More Difficult for New Jersey Entities to Obtain Financial Assistance for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites From the HDSRF Program
In his last days in office, Gov. Chris Christie signed legislation that may make it more difficult for New Jersey entities to obtain financial assistance for the remediation of contaminated sites from the Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund (HDSRF). Most notably, the new law removes the Innocent Party Grant from the realm of grants offered under the HDSRF program.
HDSRF grants and loans are available to public entities, private entities, and non-profit organizations who need financial assistance to perform a remediation pursuant to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP) Site Remediation Program requirements. The program was established in July 1993 to provide funding to public and qualifying private entities for the remediation of a suspected or known discharge of a hazardous substance or hazardous waste.
The HDSRF program is funded through a constitutionally-dedicated portion of the New Jersey Corporate Business Tax and is administered through a partnership between the DEP and the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (EDA). Under the program, financial assistance may be provided for preliminary assessments (PA) for onsite inspections and to review historical ownership and site use to determine if contamination may be present at the sites; site investigations (SI) to characterize suspected contamination through preliminary intrusive investigation work; remedial investigations (RI) to determine the extent of contamination present; and remedial action (RA) to effectuate cleanup of impacted portions of the sites.
Removal of the Innocent Party Grant
For innocent parties, the loss of funding under Assembly Bill 1954 is significant. Prior to the amendment, New Jersey’s Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act provided that “[g]rants may be made from the remediation fund to persons who own real property on which there has been a discharge of a hazardous substance or a hazardous waste and that person qualifies for an innocent party grant pursuant to section 28 of P.L.1993, c.139 (C.58:10B-6).” The statute defines an “innocent party” as a person who acquired the site prior to December 31, 1983; did not use hazardous substance/waste; and did not discharge any hazardous substance/waste at the area where the discharge is discovered.
Prior to the amendments to the HDSRF program, private parties who qualified as an innocent party were eligible for grants equal to 50 percent of the costs to complete PA, SI, RI, and RA activities, and grants were capped at $1 million per project. Assembly Bill 1954 completely eliminated the provision providing for such funding from the Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act.
Additional Changes Under Assembly Bill 1954
Assembly Bill 1954 also eliminates the availability of grants and loans to persons who would otherwise not be eligible for assistance, but who remediate a site using innovative technology or who remediate to a limited restricted use standard. The amendments also establish caps on grants to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects in brownfield development areas. For instance, the new law:
Places limitations on grants to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects in brownfield development areas. In those areas and to those government entities, the bill authorizes grants of up to 75 percent of the total costs of the remedial action.
Reduces the additional amount over the annual cap on financial assistance and grants otherwise in effect, which may be awarded in any one year to those government entities for projects in brownfield development areas, from $2,000,000 to $1,000,000.
Lowers the cumulative total amount of matching grants that may be awarded to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects involving the redevelopment of property for recreation and conservation purposes from $5,000,000 to $2,500,000 per year.
Reduces the cumulative annual cap on the maximum amount of financial assistance and grants that may be issued to a person from $1,000,000 to $500,000, and to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities from $3,000,000 to $2,000,000 except for projects in brownfield development areas.
The amendments also alter the priority for the award of financial assistance or grants from the remediation fund. First priority is given to sites that have been contaminated by a discharge or a suspected discharge of a hazardous substance or hazardous waste and where the discharge poses an imminent and significant threat to a drinking water source, to human health, or to a sensitive or significant ecological area; second priority is given to sites that are owned by a municipality in a brownfield development area; and third priority is given to sites in areas designated as Planning Area 1 (Metropolitan) and Planning Area 2 (Suburban) pursuant to the State Planning Act. The EDA is also required to adopt criteria, which must be met by a municipality, county, or redevelopment entity that applies for a grant, that the subject real property be developed within a three-year period from completion of the remediation.
Finally, Assembly Bill 1954 provides that funding for a preliminary assessment or site investigation must be expended within two years after the date of the award, while funding for a remedial investigation of a contaminated site must be expended within five years of the award date. If the financial assistance or grant is not expended within the time limits provided, the award would be cancelled. In addition, awards will not be approved until the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the EDA that it has expended or will expend the full amount of any previous financial assistance or grant awarded to the applicant for the same property.
If you have any questions about the HDSRF Program, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
NJ Law Limits Availability of Remediation Grants Under HDSRF Program
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
New Legislation May Make it More Difficult for New Jersey Entities to Obtain Financial Assistance for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites From the HDSRF Program
In his last days in office, Gov. Chris Christie signed legislation that may make it more difficult for New Jersey entities to obtain financial assistance for the remediation of contaminated sites from the Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund (HDSRF). Most notably, the new law removes the Innocent Party Grant from the realm of grants offered under the HDSRF program.
HDSRF grants and loans are available to public entities, private entities, and non-profit organizations who need financial assistance to perform a remediation pursuant to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP) Site Remediation Program requirements. The program was established in July 1993 to provide funding to public and qualifying private entities for the remediation of a suspected or known discharge of a hazardous substance or hazardous waste.
The HDSRF program is funded through a constitutionally-dedicated portion of the New Jersey Corporate Business Tax and is administered through a partnership between the DEP and the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (EDA). Under the program, financial assistance may be provided for preliminary assessments (PA) for onsite inspections and to review historical ownership and site use to determine if contamination may be present at the sites; site investigations (SI) to characterize suspected contamination through preliminary intrusive investigation work; remedial investigations (RI) to determine the extent of contamination present; and remedial action (RA) to effectuate cleanup of impacted portions of the sites.
Removal of the Innocent Party Grant
For innocent parties, the loss of funding under Assembly Bill 1954 is significant. Prior to the amendment, New Jersey’s Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act provided that “[g]rants may be made from the remediation fund to persons who own real property on which there has been a discharge of a hazardous substance or a hazardous waste and that person qualifies for an innocent party grant pursuant to section 28 of P.L.1993, c.139 (C.58:10B-6).” The statute defines an “innocent party” as a person who acquired the site prior to December 31, 1983; did not use hazardous substance/waste; and did not discharge any hazardous substance/waste at the area where the discharge is discovered.
Prior to the amendments to the HDSRF program, private parties who qualified as an innocent party were eligible for grants equal to 50 percent of the costs to complete PA, SI, RI, and RA activities, and grants were capped at $1 million per project. Assembly Bill 1954 completely eliminated the provision providing for such funding from the Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act.
Additional Changes Under Assembly Bill 1954
Assembly Bill 1954 also eliminates the availability of grants and loans to persons who would otherwise not be eligible for assistance, but who remediate a site using innovative technology or who remediate to a limited restricted use standard. The amendments also establish caps on grants to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects in brownfield development areas. For instance, the new law:
Places limitations on grants to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects in brownfield development areas. In those areas and to those government entities, the bill authorizes grants of up to 75 percent of the total costs of the remedial action.
Reduces the additional amount over the annual cap on financial assistance and grants otherwise in effect, which may be awarded in any one year to those government entities for projects in brownfield development areas, from $2,000,000 to $1,000,000.
Lowers the cumulative total amount of matching grants that may be awarded to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities for projects involving the redevelopment of property for recreation and conservation purposes from $5,000,000 to $2,500,000 per year.
Reduces the cumulative annual cap on the maximum amount of financial assistance and grants that may be issued to a person from $1,000,000 to $500,000, and to municipalities, counties, and redevelopment entities from $3,000,000 to $2,000,000 except for projects in brownfield development areas.
The amendments also alter the priority for the award of financial assistance or grants from the remediation fund. First priority is given to sites that have been contaminated by a discharge or a suspected discharge of a hazardous substance or hazardous waste and where the discharge poses an imminent and significant threat to a drinking water source, to human health, or to a sensitive or significant ecological area; second priority is given to sites that are owned by a municipality in a brownfield development area; and third priority is given to sites in areas designated as Planning Area 1 (Metropolitan) and Planning Area 2 (Suburban) pursuant to the State Planning Act. The EDA is also required to adopt criteria, which must be met by a municipality, county, or redevelopment entity that applies for a grant, that the subject real property be developed within a three-year period from completion of the remediation.
Finally, Assembly Bill 1954 provides that funding for a preliminary assessment or site investigation must be expended within two years after the date of the award, while funding for a remedial investigation of a contaminated site must be expended within five years of the award date. If the financial assistance or grant is not expended within the time limits provided, the award would be cancelled. In addition, awards will not be approved until the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the EDA that it has expended or will expend the full amount of any previous financial assistance or grant awarded to the applicant for the same property.
If you have any questions about the HDSRF Program, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
