Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe legalization of sports betting in New Jersey is becoming more bleak, following a court’s recent decision to uphold a lower court’s ruling prohibiting passage of the betting legislation.
A three-panel federal appeals court affirmed the ruling that the Garden State’s new sports betting law violates federal statute, and therefore should not be implemented. While legal analysts were divided about how the federal appeals court would rule, recent attention the case garnered about sports law, state sovereignty and the integrity of sports has led many to believe that the issue will eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. State Sen. Ray Lesniak – a strong supporter for legalizing sports gambling – said as much following the ruling, which may pave the way for the nation’s premier court to make a final determination about the dispute, which is beginning to prompt other states to consider their own sports betting options.
“The only beneficiaries of today’s court decision are organized crime-run sports betting rings and offshore Internet sports betting gaming sites,” said Lesniak. “We will either take our appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court or ask the entire court of appeals bench, which may give us a quicker decision, to take a look at this issue.”
Many states take the view that the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is discriminatory against the states not included under the law, which currently allows a handful of states – Nevada, Oregon, Montana, and Delaware – to maintain sports betting. Rather than being a federal constitutional issue, many states – such as New Jersey – view it as a state issue and a threat their sovereignty.
After all, voters overwhelmingly passed a sports betting referendum in 2011. In addition, with many states experiencing budgetary shortfalls and trying to overcome the grips of high unemployment, regulated sports betting has the potential to provide ailing states with revenue and put an end to illegal sports gambling that could take money away from the state. We can expect to see these issues discussed at length should the case make it to the Supreme Court.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The legalization of sports betting in New Jersey is becoming more bleak, following a court’s recent decision to uphold a lower court’s ruling prohibiting passage of the betting legislation.
A three-panel federal appeals court affirmed the ruling that the Garden State’s new sports betting law violates federal statute, and therefore should not be implemented. While legal analysts were divided about how the federal appeals court would rule, recent attention the case garnered about sports law, state sovereignty and the integrity of sports has led many to believe that the issue will eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. State Sen. Ray Lesniak – a strong supporter for legalizing sports gambling – said as much following the ruling, which may pave the way for the nation’s premier court to make a final determination about the dispute, which is beginning to prompt other states to consider their own sports betting options.
“The only beneficiaries of today’s court decision are organized crime-run sports betting rings and offshore Internet sports betting gaming sites,” said Lesniak. “We will either take our appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court or ask the entire court of appeals bench, which may give us a quicker decision, to take a look at this issue.”
Many states take the view that the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is discriminatory against the states not included under the law, which currently allows a handful of states – Nevada, Oregon, Montana, and Delaware – to maintain sports betting. Rather than being a federal constitutional issue, many states – such as New Jersey – view it as a state issue and a threat their sovereignty.
After all, voters overwhelmingly passed a sports betting referendum in 2011. In addition, with many states experiencing budgetary shortfalls and trying to overcome the grips of high unemployment, regulated sports betting has the potential to provide ailing states with revenue and put an end to illegal sports gambling that could take money away from the state. We can expect to see these issues discussed at length should the case make it to the Supreme Court.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!