Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Breaking Down the NFL's Growing Concussion Lawsuit Rate
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 11, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
There seem to be more and more ongoing lawsuits against the NFL
A majority of these suits (most of them are of the concussion lawsuit nature) involve players who are asserting the league is responsible for their severe and chronic injuries, including the legendary quarterback Dan Marino who joined the latest suit, but subsequently withdrew his name.
Marino and 14 other former NFL players filed the lawsuit in a Pennsylvania federal court May 28, joining the ranks of the more than 4,500 other players who have filed similar lawsuits, according to USA Today. Players have accused the league of misleading players as to the long-term dangers of concussions. The plaintiffs and the NFL managed to agree on a settlement of $765 million in August, an agreement that a federal judge rejected in January on the grounds that it would provide insufficient funds to pay all claimants over its lifetime.
There is much speculation about whether the NFL can win the lawsuit or not. To see what the league is confronting, let’s take a look at the official counts listed in the document.
What’s inside the lawsuit
The lawsuit from which Marino withdrew, but the 14 other former players continue to support, alleges several counts of wrongdoing on behalf of the NFL.
- Fraudulent concealment – The plaintiffs allege that the NFL concealed facts and information that caused them to be exposed to harm. In this case, the information refers to the long-term dangers that players faced from concussions. Under contract law, a plaintiff can recover from a defendant if he or she can prove that the defendant knew about, but concealed a fact in order to deliberately mislead him or her, and that he or she suffered damage as a result.
- Civil conspiracy – The lawsuit alleges that the NFL “actively, aggressively and deliberately” conspired with team members and contractors to discount the connection between multiple concussions, the NFL’s “return-to-play” policy and long-term health effects of head injuries. Conspiracy generally carries no punishment on its own, but rather allows all members of a conspiracy to be charged with the penalties for the illegal acts carried out as a result. For example, a team owner might hypothetically be charged if it could be proven that he or she conspired with a coach to illegally return players to the field, even if the owner did nothing explicitly against the law.
- Negligence – Negligence differs from civil conspiracy in that it doesn’t require that the defendant’s wrongdoing be deliberate. The count alleges that the NFL “knew or should have known” that its action or inaction would cause harm to its players, toward whom it assumed a duty. Negligence holds people responsible for acting in a way that someone of ordinary prudence would have in the same circumstances.
- Damages – A count of damages alleges that the defendant caused the plaintiff to experience costs, loss of earnings and physical or mental suffering as a result of the defendant’s actions. In this case, the damages resulted from the long-term health effects of multiple concussions. Damages come in the form of monetary compensation, and can be compensatory – like in the current case – or punitive.
- Medical monitoring – This final count describes the monitoring necessary to keep plaintiffs safe as a result of their now greater risk of medical illness or injury. The plaintiffs may require specialized testing that is not generally given to the public.
The lawsuit seeks a variety of damages, attorneys’ fees, costs of suit and further relief as deemed just and proper by the court.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your sports and entertainment matters, please contact ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Breaking Down the NFL's Growing Concussion Lawsuit Rate
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
There seem to be more and more ongoing lawsuits against the NFL
A majority of these suits (most of them are of the concussion lawsuit nature) involve players who are asserting the league is responsible for their severe and chronic injuries, including the legendary quarterback Dan Marino who joined the latest suit, but subsequently withdrew his name.
Marino and 14 other former NFL players filed the lawsuit in a Pennsylvania federal court May 28, joining the ranks of the more than 4,500 other players who have filed similar lawsuits, according to USA Today. Players have accused the league of misleading players as to the long-term dangers of concussions. The plaintiffs and the NFL managed to agree on a settlement of $765 million in August, an agreement that a federal judge rejected in January on the grounds that it would provide insufficient funds to pay all claimants over its lifetime.
There is much speculation about whether the NFL can win the lawsuit or not. To see what the league is confronting, let’s take a look at the official counts listed in the document.
What’s inside the lawsuit
The lawsuit from which Marino withdrew, but the 14 other former players continue to support, alleges several counts of wrongdoing on behalf of the NFL.
- Fraudulent concealment – The plaintiffs allege that the NFL concealed facts and information that caused them to be exposed to harm. In this case, the information refers to the long-term dangers that players faced from concussions. Under contract law, a plaintiff can recover from a defendant if he or she can prove that the defendant knew about, but concealed a fact in order to deliberately mislead him or her, and that he or she suffered damage as a result.
- Civil conspiracy – The lawsuit alleges that the NFL “actively, aggressively and deliberately” conspired with team members and contractors to discount the connection between multiple concussions, the NFL’s “return-to-play” policy and long-term health effects of head injuries. Conspiracy generally carries no punishment on its own, but rather allows all members of a conspiracy to be charged with the penalties for the illegal acts carried out as a result. For example, a team owner might hypothetically be charged if it could be proven that he or she conspired with a coach to illegally return players to the field, even if the owner did nothing explicitly against the law.
- Negligence – Negligence differs from civil conspiracy in that it doesn’t require that the defendant’s wrongdoing be deliberate. The count alleges that the NFL “knew or should have known” that its action or inaction would cause harm to its players, toward whom it assumed a duty. Negligence holds people responsible for acting in a way that someone of ordinary prudence would have in the same circumstances.
- Damages – A count of damages alleges that the defendant caused the plaintiff to experience costs, loss of earnings and physical or mental suffering as a result of the defendant’s actions. In this case, the damages resulted from the long-term health effects of multiple concussions. Damages come in the form of monetary compensation, and can be compensatory – like in the current case – or punitive.
- Medical monitoring – This final count describes the monitoring necessary to keep plaintiffs safe as a result of their now greater risk of medical illness or injury. The plaintiffs may require specialized testing that is not generally given to the public.
The lawsuit seeks a variety of damages, attorneys’ fees, costs of suit and further relief as deemed just and proper by the court.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your sports and entertainment matters, please contact ScarinciHollenbeck.com.