Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Mums the Word: Firms Agree to Restrict Early Access to Analyst Reports
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: March 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Several prominent Wall Street firms have reached an agreement with New York regulators to end the practice of cooperating with surveys that provide early access to analysts’ opinions.
New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman requested the deal as part of his investigation into the early release of analyst sentiment to preferred investors, a practice he has dubbed “Insider Trading 2.0.” Schneiderman argues that the surveys put investors at a disadvantage by giving traders a “sneak peak” at reports before they are released to the general public.
Last month, Schneiderman announced a similar agreement with BlackRock, under which the asset manager agreed to end its practice of surveying analysts regarding the firms they cover. According to the NY Attorney General, the design, timing, and structure of the surveys allowed BlackRock to obtain information from analysts that could be used to front-run future analyst revisions.
The latest agreements cover the survey respondents, Merrill Lynch, UBS Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. The firms have agreed to terminate their participation in any survey worldwide that relates to companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
“At my request, these firms have agreed to stop a practice that can offer an advantage to powerful clients at the expense of others,” said Schneiderman. “Our markets will only be fair and healthy if everyone plays by the same rules, which is why we will continue to take action against those who provide unfair advantages to elite traders at the expense of the rest of us. I applaud these firms for their leadership and cooperation.”
As the latest settlement highlights, insider trading — in all its potential variants — continues to be a top priority for state and federal regulators. Firms are advised to stay on top of current legal developments and seek the advice of experienced counsel regarding how best to achieve compliance.
If you have any questions about the settlements or would like to discuss how to best protect your company from insider trading allegations, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency Defense & Investigations
- Locations: New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Mums the Word: Firms Agree to Restrict Early Access to Analyst Reports
Author: Dan Brecher
Several prominent Wall Street firms have reached an agreement with New York regulators to end the practice of cooperating with surveys that provide early access to analysts’ opinions.
New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman requested the deal as part of his investigation into the early release of analyst sentiment to preferred investors, a practice he has dubbed “Insider Trading 2.0.” Schneiderman argues that the surveys put investors at a disadvantage by giving traders a “sneak peak” at reports before they are released to the general public.
Last month, Schneiderman announced a similar agreement with BlackRock, under which the asset manager agreed to end its practice of surveying analysts regarding the firms they cover. According to the NY Attorney General, the design, timing, and structure of the surveys allowed BlackRock to obtain information from analysts that could be used to front-run future analyst revisions.
The latest agreements cover the survey respondents, Merrill Lynch, UBS Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. The firms have agreed to terminate their participation in any survey worldwide that relates to companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
“At my request, these firms have agreed to stop a practice that can offer an advantage to powerful clients at the expense of others,” said Schneiderman. “Our markets will only be fair and healthy if everyone plays by the same rules, which is why we will continue to take action against those who provide unfair advantages to elite traders at the expense of the rest of us. I applaud these firms for their leadership and cooperation.”
As the latest settlement highlights, insider trading — in all its potential variants — continues to be a top priority for state and federal regulators. Firms are advised to stay on top of current legal developments and seek the advice of experienced counsel regarding how best to achieve compliance.
If you have any questions about the settlements or would like to discuss how to best protect your company from insider trading allegations, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.