Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Brian McNamee's Defamation Lawsuit Involves Steroids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Steroids in baseball has been a major topic of conversation for quite some time.
Former New York Yankee and Boston Red Sox pitcher, Roger Clemens, was one of the most recent targets, as his trainer, Brian McNamee, said he provided Clemens with performance-enhancing drugs.
PEDs have led to numerous legal battles, but one of the cases still going on has nothing to do with the legality of steroids in baseball. After being accused by McNamee, Clemens attempted to discredit him as a source of this information which McNamee claims led to defamation. It appears as though this case could be headed to trial soon.
McNamee has to prove the following four elements in order to get a ruling in his favor for defamation:
1. The defamatory statement must be published. This means it can be spoken, written, pictured or gestured. Written statements are often considered more serious by courts, as these last longer than the spoken word.
2. In addition to being published, the statement must also be false. Someone can speak something that is mean or disparaging, but if it is true it isn’t defamatory. Generally, opinions don’t count as defamation because it is difficult to prove if such statements are objectively false. For example, Clemens calling McNamee the worst trainer of all time isn’t a defamatory statement.
3. The third element that must be proven is that the statement was “injurious.” Defamation lawsuits are filed to repair a reputation, which means a statement needs to actually hurt someone’s image.
4. The final element is that the statement is “unprivileged.” This means that people who testify in court falsely can not be sued for defamation. Privileged statements are those when free speech is important enough that people should not have to worry about being sued for defamation.
The Clemens vs. McNamee legal battle has been going on for quite some time. It will be interesting to see if it ends up going to trial – and if McNamee wins – as defamation is not any easy thing to prove, shown by the four aforementioned elements.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Brian McNamee's Defamation Lawsuit Involves Steroids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Steroids in baseball has been a major topic of conversation for quite some time.
Former New York Yankee and Boston Red Sox pitcher, Roger Clemens, was one of the most recent targets, as his trainer, Brian McNamee, said he provided Clemens with performance-enhancing drugs.
PEDs have led to numerous legal battles, but one of the cases still going on has nothing to do with the legality of steroids in baseball. After being accused by McNamee, Clemens attempted to discredit him as a source of this information which McNamee claims led to defamation. It appears as though this case could be headed to trial soon.
McNamee has to prove the following four elements in order to get a ruling in his favor for defamation:
1. The defamatory statement must be published. This means it can be spoken, written, pictured or gestured. Written statements are often considered more serious by courts, as these last longer than the spoken word.
2. In addition to being published, the statement must also be false. Someone can speak something that is mean or disparaging, but if it is true it isn’t defamatory. Generally, opinions don’t count as defamation because it is difficult to prove if such statements are objectively false. For example, Clemens calling McNamee the worst trainer of all time isn’t a defamatory statement.
3. The third element that must be proven is that the statement was “injurious.” Defamation lawsuits are filed to repair a reputation, which means a statement needs to actually hurt someone’s image.
4. The final element is that the statement is “unprivileged.” This means that people who testify in court falsely can not be sued for defamation. Privileged statements are those when free speech is important enough that people should not have to worry about being sued for defamation.
The Clemens vs. McNamee legal battle has been going on for quite some time. It will be interesting to see if it ends up going to trial – and if McNamee wins – as defamation is not any easy thing to prove, shown by the four aforementioned elements.