Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 22, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIf you’ve been keeping up with the latest sports law, you’ve probably heard Texas A&M Defensive Coordinator John Chavis will face a jury of his peers regarding his alleged breach of contract with Louisiana State University.
The Advocate reported Baton Rouge District Judge Tim Kelley recently concluded a jury will decide whether Chavis or LSU breached the former’s contract. The judge’s decision is the latest development in a high-profile sports lawsuit that’s been going on since early 2015.
Chavis is, according to Saturday Down South, one of the most reputable DCs in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Southeastern Conference. He served as DC for the Tennessee Volunteers (1995-2008) and the LSU Tigers (2009-2014). Now, he’s a DC and linebackers coach for the Texas A&M Aggies. During his time at LSU, analysts consistently ranked the team’s defense in the top 10 across the nation.
What’s going on with the lawsuit? SB Nation provided a rundown of the case. On Jan. 5, 2015, Chavis submitted his 30-day notice to LSU in the wake of rumors speculating the DC was to leave the Baton Rouge-based school for a position at Texas A&M. According to CBS Sports, Chavis’ LSU contract expired on Dec. 31, 2015. However, Chavis maintained the contract contained the following conditions which allowed him to legally terminate the agreement before the end of last year:
Here’s where things get a little messy. SB Nation noted that, on Jan. 15 of last year, a picture surfaced showing Chavis dawning Texas A&M gear while on an alleged recruiting visit with Kris Boyd, a corner back now playing for the University of Texas. The photo implies that Chavis was working for his current school before the 30-day notice period expired on Feb. 4. From LSU’s perspective, recruitment is a part of a coach’s job, and therefore, Chavis broke the contract’s agreement.
KBTX.com reported that, before Chavis allegedly visited Boyd in an attempt to recruit him, LSU Director of Athletics Joe Alleva sent the DC a letter claiming the latter must pay the university $400,000. This was before Texas A&M officially hired Chavis. This prompted Chavis to file a suit claiming not only that he didn’t have to pay the penalty but also that Texas A&M was responsible for paying the fee if that was the case.
Last year, a Texas judge dismissed the lawsuit, asserting the case belonged in a Louisiana district, according to Alabama.com. One of the recent arguments against Chavis’ suit is that he did not break the contract because he did not sign an amended contract during his tenure at LSU. However, the DC’s old school is still pursuing the case.
Jill Craft, Chavis’ lead attorney, argued the $400,000 buyout Chavis owes the school is void because the school altered the contract in 2013. In her words, “[Chavis] didn’t breach it because he didn’t sign it.” However, Kelley maintained the lawsuit will go to jury in any case. As of the end of October, Kelley has not set a date for the jury trial.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association contracts are quite complex, requiring thorough analysis from experienced attorneys. If you’re in the midst of negotiating a contract with your university or have any questions regarding the matter, please contact me, Anthony Caruso, 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
If you’ve been keeping up with the latest sports law, you’ve probably heard Texas A&M Defensive Coordinator John Chavis will face a jury of his peers regarding his alleged breach of contract with Louisiana State University.
The Advocate reported Baton Rouge District Judge Tim Kelley recently concluded a jury will decide whether Chavis or LSU breached the former’s contract. The judge’s decision is the latest development in a high-profile sports lawsuit that’s been going on since early 2015.
Chavis is, according to Saturday Down South, one of the most reputable DCs in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Southeastern Conference. He served as DC for the Tennessee Volunteers (1995-2008) and the LSU Tigers (2009-2014). Now, he’s a DC and linebackers coach for the Texas A&M Aggies. During his time at LSU, analysts consistently ranked the team’s defense in the top 10 across the nation.
What’s going on with the lawsuit? SB Nation provided a rundown of the case. On Jan. 5, 2015, Chavis submitted his 30-day notice to LSU in the wake of rumors speculating the DC was to leave the Baton Rouge-based school for a position at Texas A&M. According to CBS Sports, Chavis’ LSU contract expired on Dec. 31, 2015. However, Chavis maintained the contract contained the following conditions which allowed him to legally terminate the agreement before the end of last year:
Here’s where things get a little messy. SB Nation noted that, on Jan. 15 of last year, a picture surfaced showing Chavis dawning Texas A&M gear while on an alleged recruiting visit with Kris Boyd, a corner back now playing for the University of Texas. The photo implies that Chavis was working for his current school before the 30-day notice period expired on Feb. 4. From LSU’s perspective, recruitment is a part of a coach’s job, and therefore, Chavis broke the contract’s agreement.
KBTX.com reported that, before Chavis allegedly visited Boyd in an attempt to recruit him, LSU Director of Athletics Joe Alleva sent the DC a letter claiming the latter must pay the university $400,000. This was before Texas A&M officially hired Chavis. This prompted Chavis to file a suit claiming not only that he didn’t have to pay the penalty but also that Texas A&M was responsible for paying the fee if that was the case.
Last year, a Texas judge dismissed the lawsuit, asserting the case belonged in a Louisiana district, according to Alabama.com. One of the recent arguments against Chavis’ suit is that he did not break the contract because he did not sign an amended contract during his tenure at LSU. However, the DC’s old school is still pursuing the case.
Jill Craft, Chavis’ lead attorney, argued the $400,000 buyout Chavis owes the school is void because the school altered the contract in 2013. In her words, “[Chavis] didn’t breach it because he didn’t sign it.” However, Kelley maintained the lawsuit will go to jury in any case. As of the end of October, Kelley has not set a date for the jury trial.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association contracts are quite complex, requiring thorough analysis from experienced attorneys. If you’re in the midst of negotiating a contract with your university or have any questions regarding the matter, please contact me, Anthony Caruso, 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!