Lawmakers Poised to Raise the Bar for New Jersey Shareholders’ Derivative Suits
Lawmakers in New Jersey are looking to create legislation that would make it more difficult to bring derivative suits by corporate shareholders could soon become a reality. The measure has been approved by the New Jersey Assembly and is quickly making its way its way through the Senate.
Below is a brief summary of the provisions of the legislation (S-2326/A-3123):
A shareholder may not commence or maintain a derivative proceeding unless the shareholder: (1) was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the act or omission complained of or became a shareholder through transfer by operation of law from one who was a shareholder at that time and remains a shareholder throughout the derivative proceeding; and (2) fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corporation in enforcing the right of the corporation.
Prior to commencing a derivative proceeding, a shareholder must make a written demand upon the corporation to take suitable action. No action can taken until 90 days have expired from the date the demand was made unless the shareholder has been notified that the demand has been rejected by the corporation or unless “irreparable injury to the corporation” would result by waiting for the expiration of the 90-day period.
A derivative proceeding may be dismissed if the maintenance of the derivative proceeding is “not in the best interests of the corporation.” This determination must be made in good faith by a majority vote of independent directors, a majority vote of a board-appointed committee, or a court-appointed panel.
If a derivative proceeding is commenced after the demand is rejected, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the decision makers were not “independent.”
A director is considered independent if he or she has: (i) no economic interest in the challenged act or transaction material to him or her, other than an economic interest that is shared by all shareholders generally; and (ii) no material, personal, or business relationships with the defendant directors or officers who have a material interest in the act or transaction challenged.
A derivative proceeding or a shareholder class action could not be discontinued or settled without the court’s approval. If the court determines that a proposed discontinuance or settlement will substantially affect the interests of the corporation’s shareholders or a class of shareholders, the court must direct that notice be given to the shareholders affected.
In any derivative proceeding or shareholder class action instituted by a shareholder or shareholders holding less than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of the corporation, unless the shares have a market value in excess of $250,000, the corporation can require the plaintiff to give security for the reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees.
Under the bill, a New Jersey corporation must amend its certificate of incorporation to adopt the statutory standards. The bill in intended to bring New Jersey’s laws in line with those of neighboring states and is largely based on the Model Business Corporation Act. The New Jersey Corporate and Business Law Study Commission also supports the changes.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Lawmakers Looking To Change Shareholders’ Derivative Suits
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Lawmakers Poised to Raise the Bar for New Jersey Shareholders’ Derivative Suits
Lawmakers in New Jersey are looking to create legislation that would make it more difficult to bring derivative suits by corporate shareholders could soon become a reality. The measure has been approved by the New Jersey Assembly and is quickly making its way its way through the Senate.
Below is a brief summary of the provisions of the legislation (S-2326/A-3123):
A shareholder may not commence or maintain a derivative proceeding unless the shareholder: (1) was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the act or omission complained of or became a shareholder through transfer by operation of law from one who was a shareholder at that time and remains a shareholder throughout the derivative proceeding; and (2) fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corporation in enforcing the right of the corporation.
Prior to commencing a derivative proceeding, a shareholder must make a written demand upon the corporation to take suitable action. No action can taken until 90 days have expired from the date the demand was made unless the shareholder has been notified that the demand has been rejected by the corporation or unless “irreparable injury to the corporation” would result by waiting for the expiration of the 90-day period.
A derivative proceeding may be dismissed if the maintenance of the derivative proceeding is “not in the best interests of the corporation.” This determination must be made in good faith by a majority vote of independent directors, a majority vote of a board-appointed committee, or a court-appointed panel.
If a derivative proceeding is commenced after the demand is rejected, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the decision makers were not “independent.”
A director is considered independent if he or she has: (i) no economic interest in the challenged act or transaction material to him or her, other than an economic interest that is shared by all shareholders generally; and (ii) no material, personal, or business relationships with the defendant directors or officers who have a material interest in the act or transaction challenged.
A derivative proceeding or a shareholder class action could not be discontinued or settled without the court’s approval. If the court determines that a proposed discontinuance or settlement will substantially affect the interests of the corporation’s shareholders or a class of shareholders, the court must direct that notice be given to the shareholders affected.
In any derivative proceeding or shareholder class action instituted by a shareholder or shareholders holding less than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of the corporation, unless the shares have a market value in excess of $250,000, the corporation can require the plaintiff to give security for the reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees.
Under the bill, a New Jersey corporation must amend its certificate of incorporation to adopt the statutory standards. The bill in intended to bring New Jersey’s laws in line with those of neighboring states and is largely based on the Model Business Corporation Act. The New Jersey Corporate and Business Law Study Commission also supports the changes.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
