Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Joint And POD Accounts: Weapon of Choice Of Transferees When Exerting Undue Influence?

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: October 1, 2013

Key Contacts

Back

Will contests alleging undue influence are not uncommon. A will was, for many years, the only means of transmitting property from a decedent to an heir.

Joint And POD Accounts: Weapon of Choice Of Transferees When Exerting Undue Influence?

Will contests alleging undue influence are not uncommon. A will was, for many years, the only means of transmitting property from a decedent to an heir. New forms of ownership were created as the result of the public’s disdain for will contests and delays in transferring property through probate. The result was new forms of ownership that were designed to provide the survivor with immediate access to the bank or brokerage account. Transfer on Death (TOD), Payable on Death (POD) and joint tenancy with the right of survivorship (JTROS) accounts pass the property by operation of law outside of the probate estate. Life insurance and retirement benefits are similar in that property pass in accordance with the beneficiary designation contained in a form that may be filed by mail or on-line.

A person exerting undue influence will find it easier to be named as a beneficiary of a POD, TOD or JTWROS account rather than by will. When a charge of undue influence is leveled, the courts use a similar analysis to that in a will contest. Typically, when the moving party is able to demonstrate that certain factors are present, a presumption in favor of undue influence arises which must then be rebutted. Undue influence is presumed when a person having a confidential relationship actively secures or procures the instrument of transfer and is a beneficiary of such a transfer. The person is able to prevail upon the donor because of the donor’s ill health, frailty, lack of capacity.

A recent Florida case, Estate of Kester, examined the traditional factors, however, it is difficult for a reader to determine how much weight the court assigned to each factor in arriving at its conclusion. Despite being named agent under a power of attorney, the defendant was not the only child with a close relationship to the decedent. In addition, the decedent changed the beneficiary designations independently of the defendant.

In a New Jersey case, In re Estate of Bagno, the Appellate Division examined the use of joint accounts. Under N.J.S.A. 17:16I-5(a), the surviving joint account holder is entitled to the account unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a different intention at the time the account is created. A party may prove by the preponderance of the evidence that the surviving account holder had a confidential relationship with the donor. Once there is a presumption of undue influence, the burden of persuasion shifts to the survivor.

The Appellate Division evaluated the relationship between donor and donee, the donor’s physical and mental health, the donor’s reliance on the donee for care, whether the donee is a substantial beneficiary, whether account was created openly or in secret, whether the account is at variance with donor’s One factor that is especially important is whether the donee assisted in establishing the account or was the account created with the help of others.

It is particularly troublesome to see an estate plan upset by a subsequent change resulting from a POD account or a beneficiary designation. Typically, the change drains the estate of liquidity or shifts the tax burden disproportionately to property passing by the will.

One constant and recurring theme in estate planning is the abuse of trust placed in agents under a Power of Attorney or in persons having a confidential relationship with a transferor. An analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding an account designation is similar to that of a will and is just as costly.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda post image

Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda

On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda"
What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements? post image

What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?

If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?"
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage? post image

Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?

Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?"
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer post image

Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer

Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer"
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC post image

Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC

Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC"
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses post image

Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses

Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Joint And POD Accounts: Weapon of Choice Of Transferees When Exerting Undue Influence?

Author: James F. McDonough

Will contests alleging undue influence are not uncommon. A will was, for many years, the only means of transmitting property from a decedent to an heir.

Joint And POD Accounts: Weapon of Choice Of Transferees When Exerting Undue Influence?

Will contests alleging undue influence are not uncommon. A will was, for many years, the only means of transmitting property from a decedent to an heir. New forms of ownership were created as the result of the public’s disdain for will contests and delays in transferring property through probate. The result was new forms of ownership that were designed to provide the survivor with immediate access to the bank or brokerage account. Transfer on Death (TOD), Payable on Death (POD) and joint tenancy with the right of survivorship (JTROS) accounts pass the property by operation of law outside of the probate estate. Life insurance and retirement benefits are similar in that property pass in accordance with the beneficiary designation contained in a form that may be filed by mail or on-line.

A person exerting undue influence will find it easier to be named as a beneficiary of a POD, TOD or JTWROS account rather than by will. When a charge of undue influence is leveled, the courts use a similar analysis to that in a will contest. Typically, when the moving party is able to demonstrate that certain factors are present, a presumption in favor of undue influence arises which must then be rebutted. Undue influence is presumed when a person having a confidential relationship actively secures or procures the instrument of transfer and is a beneficiary of such a transfer. The person is able to prevail upon the donor because of the donor’s ill health, frailty, lack of capacity.

A recent Florida case, Estate of Kester, examined the traditional factors, however, it is difficult for a reader to determine how much weight the court assigned to each factor in arriving at its conclusion. Despite being named agent under a power of attorney, the defendant was not the only child with a close relationship to the decedent. In addition, the decedent changed the beneficiary designations independently of the defendant.

In a New Jersey case, In re Estate of Bagno, the Appellate Division examined the use of joint accounts. Under N.J.S.A. 17:16I-5(a), the surviving joint account holder is entitled to the account unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a different intention at the time the account is created. A party may prove by the preponderance of the evidence that the surviving account holder had a confidential relationship with the donor. Once there is a presumption of undue influence, the burden of persuasion shifts to the survivor.

The Appellate Division evaluated the relationship between donor and donee, the donor’s physical and mental health, the donor’s reliance on the donee for care, whether the donee is a substantial beneficiary, whether account was created openly or in secret, whether the account is at variance with donor’s One factor that is especially important is whether the donee assisted in establishing the account or was the account created with the help of others.

It is particularly troublesome to see an estate plan upset by a subsequent change resulting from a POD account or a beneficiary designation. Typically, the change drains the estate of liquidity or shifts the tax burden disproportionately to property passing by the will.

One constant and recurring theme in estate planning is the abuse of trust placed in agents under a Power of Attorney or in persons having a confidential relationship with a transferor. An analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding an account designation is similar to that of a will and is just as costly.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!

Please select a category(s) below: