Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
John Travolta Fails To SLAPP His Ex-Pilot
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 18, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
I came across a particularly juicy lawsuit the other day involving John Travolta, his former pilot and an alleged affair between the two.
Despite the sensational nature of this possibility, the juicy part actually lies in Travolta’s representation’s creative use of California’s anti-SLAPP statute.
By Dylan Ashe from San Jose, USA (John Travolta) [CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
Legal Terminology
Before we begin discussing the case, we should get a few of the legal terms out of the way. The important terms we will be examining today are “anti-SLAPP statute,” “declaratory relief” and “pre-litigation demand letter.”
- Pre-litigation demand letter – A pre-litigation demand letter is any letter sent that ostensibly seeks to make demands that, if agreed to, would preclude the need to have a lawsuit. The most common form – and the one used in this case – is the trusty “cease and desist” letter.
- Declaratory relief – Declaratory relief is another pre-litigation tool. This refers to a judgment made by a court that determines the rights of parties, but does not order anything done or award damages. Frequently, declaratory relief is used to determine the correct interpretation of a contract.
- Anti-SLAPP statute – SLAPP stands for “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation,” and refers to any lawsuit that is intended to chill or hinder free speech by burdening the speaker with the cost of legal defense. In other words, if I were to write that a certain brand was completely worthless, I would be in my legal right to do so. However, I might be forced to comply with a cease and desist letter because I know that going to court would be too expensive – even if I won. Anti-SLAPP statutes are designed to prevent this type of lawsuit.
The Case
Douglas Gotterba worked as John Travolta’s personal pilot from 1981 to 1987 before quitting voluntarily. Before leaving the company, however, he allegedly signed a termination agreement. Both sides agree that there was such an agreement, but Atlo, Inc., Travolta’s aircraft company, claims that this agreement included a confidentiality clause. Gotterba disagrees. Both sides have presented their own version of a contract.
In mid-2012, Gotterba told the National Enquirer that he planned to publish a “kiss-and-tell” book detailing his six-year-long affair with Mr. Travolta. Atlo’s attorney, Martin Singer, responded to this with a cease and desist letter that demanded he stop making such statements, citing the confidentiality clause.
The Law Suit
Gotterba sued Atlo, Travolta and Travolta’s production company later that year seeking declaratory relief stating that the agreement produced by Atlo is not valid. This is where things get interesting.
Atlo asked Santa Barbara Superior Court to strike Gotterba’s action for declaratory relief on the grounds that this action was filed to prevent Travolta from exercising his right to send pre-litigation demand letters. In essence, Atlo’s anti-SLAPP filing asked the court to protect Travolta’s right to send cease and desist letters demanding that Gotterba remain silent and it asks the court to do this by refusing to make a judgment on the validity of Gotterba’s contract.
Quite correctly, the court denied Atlo’s motion, as did the appeals court, stating that Atlo has misconstrued the purpose of Gotterba’s complaint. In fact, the appeals court concluded that accepting Atlo’s argument in this case would lead to an “absurd result.”
Gotterba may indeed lose his claim in declaratory relief – that isn’t the point. The point, in my opinion, is the absurdity of Atlo’s position: Using a statute designed to protect free speech in an attempt to silence a less well-financed party is precisely the opposite of the statute’s purpose.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
John Travolta Fails To SLAPP His Ex-Pilot
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
I came across a particularly juicy lawsuit the other day involving John Travolta, his former pilot and an alleged affair between the two.
Despite the sensational nature of this possibility, the juicy part actually lies in Travolta’s representation’s creative use of California’s anti-SLAPP statute.
By Dylan Ashe from San Jose, USA (John Travolta) [CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
Legal Terminology
Before we begin discussing the case, we should get a few of the legal terms out of the way. The important terms we will be examining today are “anti-SLAPP statute,” “declaratory relief” and “pre-litigation demand letter.”
- Pre-litigation demand letter – A pre-litigation demand letter is any letter sent that ostensibly seeks to make demands that, if agreed to, would preclude the need to have a lawsuit. The most common form – and the one used in this case – is the trusty “cease and desist” letter.
- Declaratory relief – Declaratory relief is another pre-litigation tool. This refers to a judgment made by a court that determines the rights of parties, but does not order anything done or award damages. Frequently, declaratory relief is used to determine the correct interpretation of a contract.
- Anti-SLAPP statute – SLAPP stands for “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation,” and refers to any lawsuit that is intended to chill or hinder free speech by burdening the speaker with the cost of legal defense. In other words, if I were to write that a certain brand was completely worthless, I would be in my legal right to do so. However, I might be forced to comply with a cease and desist letter because I know that going to court would be too expensive – even if I won. Anti-SLAPP statutes are designed to prevent this type of lawsuit.
The Case
Douglas Gotterba worked as John Travolta’s personal pilot from 1981 to 1987 before quitting voluntarily. Before leaving the company, however, he allegedly signed a termination agreement. Both sides agree that there was such an agreement, but Atlo, Inc., Travolta’s aircraft company, claims that this agreement included a confidentiality clause. Gotterba disagrees. Both sides have presented their own version of a contract.
In mid-2012, Gotterba told the National Enquirer that he planned to publish a “kiss-and-tell” book detailing his six-year-long affair with Mr. Travolta. Atlo’s attorney, Martin Singer, responded to this with a cease and desist letter that demanded he stop making such statements, citing the confidentiality clause.
The Law Suit
Gotterba sued Atlo, Travolta and Travolta’s production company later that year seeking declaratory relief stating that the agreement produced by Atlo is not valid. This is where things get interesting.
Atlo asked Santa Barbara Superior Court to strike Gotterba’s action for declaratory relief on the grounds that this action was filed to prevent Travolta from exercising his right to send pre-litigation demand letters. In essence, Atlo’s anti-SLAPP filing asked the court to protect Travolta’s right to send cease and desist letters demanding that Gotterba remain silent and it asks the court to do this by refusing to make a judgment on the validity of Gotterba’s contract.
Quite correctly, the court denied Atlo’s motion, as did the appeals court, stating that Atlo has misconstrued the purpose of Gotterba’s complaint. In fact, the appeals court concluded that accepting Atlo’s argument in this case would lead to an “absurd result.”
Gotterba may indeed lose his claim in declaratory relief – that isn’t the point. The point, in my opinion, is the absurdity of Atlo’s position: Using a statute designed to protect free speech in an attempt to silence a less well-financed party is precisely the opposite of the statute’s purpose.