Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Is “Secret” Business Court Coming Back to Delaware?
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: May 24, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Many corporations call Delaware home because of its business friendly legal environment. It is an attractive place to incorporate a business, and it can also provide substantial court decision precedents for corporate disputes, making it more predictable as to what a Delaware court may do in deciding a disputed business matter as compared to states with substantially lesser numbers of such court cases.
One of the benefits Delaware seeks to provide that is currently under scrutiny is confidential commercial arbitration proceedings before the Delaware Court of Chancery. The so-called secret business court was created by statute in 2009, but was later ruled unconstitutional in Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr. The case is now pending before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
The 2009 law authorizes the Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court to appoint a Chancery Judge to serve as an arbitrator in business disputes involving at least $1 million. So long as both sides agree to participate, the proceedings remain entirely confidential and closed to the public. Cases do not even receive a docket number.
While businesses argue that the system provides a cost-effective and efficient means to resolve complex business litigation, open government groups and the media have raised concerns that it interferes with rights of public access to court proceedings.
“Neither Delaware’s desire to facilitate new revenue streams nor the business community’s desire to hide its conduct from public scrutiny justifies subverting the First Amendment,” the Delaware Coalition for Open Government argued in its brief before the Third Circuit. The Court of Chancery judges contend that public oversight is not needed in arbitration, where both parties have consented to the forum and the binding nature of the decision. The closed and confidential nature of similar arbitration proceedings is respected in other venues, such as in the securities and commodities industries, and in numerous other venues, such as the American arbitration Association, that provide for private arbitrations between consenting parties.
We will continue to track this case and provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Is “Secret” Business Court Coming Back to Delaware?
Author: Dan Brecher
Many corporations call Delaware home because of its business friendly legal environment. It is an attractive place to incorporate a business, and it can also provide substantial court decision precedents for corporate disputes, making it more predictable as to what a Delaware court may do in deciding a disputed business matter as compared to states with substantially lesser numbers of such court cases.
One of the benefits Delaware seeks to provide that is currently under scrutiny is confidential commercial arbitration proceedings before the Delaware Court of Chancery. The so-called secret business court was created by statute in 2009, but was later ruled unconstitutional in Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr. The case is now pending before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
The 2009 law authorizes the Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court to appoint a Chancery Judge to serve as an arbitrator in business disputes involving at least $1 million. So long as both sides agree to participate, the proceedings remain entirely confidential and closed to the public. Cases do not even receive a docket number.
While businesses argue that the system provides a cost-effective and efficient means to resolve complex business litigation, open government groups and the media have raised concerns that it interferes with rights of public access to court proceedings.
“Neither Delaware’s desire to facilitate new revenue streams nor the business community’s desire to hide its conduct from public scrutiny justifies subverting the First Amendment,” the Delaware Coalition for Open Government argued in its brief before the Third Circuit. The Court of Chancery judges contend that public oversight is not needed in arbitration, where both parties have consented to the forum and the binding nature of the decision. The closed and confidential nature of similar arbitration proceedings is respected in other venues, such as in the securities and commodities industries, and in numerous other venues, such as the American arbitration Association, that provide for private arbitrations between consenting parties.
We will continue to track this case and provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.