Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 1, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Internal Revenue Service is receiving a great deal of criticism after allegations that it relies on social media and emails as an investigative tool into potential tax law violations being committed by Americans.
For example, if a person submits a suspicious tax return in which they claim little income, but then post pictures of a luxury purchase or string of vacations they took, this could prompt greater scrutiny by the IRS, Digital Trends reports.
The charge has led to a great deal of scrutiny about which means the federal agencies can and cannot use to prosecute potential lawbreakers. When it comes to social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, the law may be on the side of the IRS if it relies on public information to support its claims, according to the news source. Information that is made publicly might be fair game for federal agents, and many professionals across different industries – ranging from divorce attorneys to insurance agents – have used information publicly posted on Facebook and Twitter in a legal atmosphere.
However, the IRS has denied using social media in any form to go after Americans.
“Suggestions that the IRS is using social media to target taxpayers for audit are wrong,” an IRS spokesperson told Fox Business. “Audits are based on the information contained on a person’s tax return, not a posting on a social media site.”
However, the IRS recently got into hot water for its controversial policy of reading taxpayers’ personal emails without a search warrant. In a U.S. Senate hearing, Acting Commissioner Steven Miller said that the no-warrant-required policy would be eliminated within 30 days for e-mail communications, according to CNET. However, he did not elaborate on whether other types of private communications would also fall under this suspended policy.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Internal Revenue Service is receiving a great deal of criticism after allegations that it relies on social media and emails as an investigative tool into potential tax law violations being committed by Americans.
For example, if a person submits a suspicious tax return in which they claim little income, but then post pictures of a luxury purchase or string of vacations they took, this could prompt greater scrutiny by the IRS, Digital Trends reports.
The charge has led to a great deal of scrutiny about which means the federal agencies can and cannot use to prosecute potential lawbreakers. When it comes to social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, the law may be on the side of the IRS if it relies on public information to support its claims, according to the news source. Information that is made publicly might be fair game for federal agents, and many professionals across different industries – ranging from divorce attorneys to insurance agents – have used information publicly posted on Facebook and Twitter in a legal atmosphere.
However, the IRS has denied using social media in any form to go after Americans.
“Suggestions that the IRS is using social media to target taxpayers for audit are wrong,” an IRS spokesperson told Fox Business. “Audits are based on the information contained on a person’s tax return, not a posting on a social media site.”
However, the IRS recently got into hot water for its controversial policy of reading taxpayers’ personal emails without a search warrant. In a U.S. Senate hearing, Acting Commissioner Steven Miller said that the no-warrant-required policy would be eliminated within 30 days for e-mail communications, according to CNET. However, he did not elaborate on whether other types of private communications would also fall under this suspended policy.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!