
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: March 1, 2013
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently fined five units of ING Groep NV a total of $1.2 million for failing to retain or review millions of emails. The penalties highlight the importance of email retention policies and procedures, particularly for regulated companies.
According to FINRA, the firms failed to properly configure hundreds of employee email accounts to ensure that messages were retained and reviewed. In addition, four of the subsidiaries did not have systems in place to retain certain types of emails, including emails sent to distribution lists, emails received as blind carbon copies, and “cloud” email (emails sent through third-party systems). Because the emails were not retained, they were not subject to supervisory review
In addition to retention violations, FINRA also found that four of the firms failed to review millions of emails that the firms’ email review software had flagged for supervisory review. Overall, supervisory principals did not evaluate nearly six million emails flagged for review because the email review software was not properly configured.
As this case makes clear, New York and New Jersey firms regulated by FINRA must follow strict guidelines for email archiving. In fact, in announcing the fines, Brad Bennett, executive vice president and chief of enforcement, made it clear that “email retention and review continues to be an important regulatory responsibility and an issue of concern for FINRA.”
Under FINRA’s Books & Records Rule (3110), member firms are required to make and preserve accounts, records, memoranda, books and correspondence in conformity with all applicable regulations, statements, and rules under SEC 17a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, record retention procedures must comply with SEC Rule 17a-4. Overall, keeping detailed records allows firms to clearly demonstrate that they have fulfilled both their investor and regulatory obligations.
If you have any questions about the case or would like to discuss your business’s email retention policies, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently fined five units of ING Groep NV a total of $1.2 million for failing to retain or review millions of emails. The penalties highlight the importance of email retention policies and procedures, particularly for regulated companies.
According to FINRA, the firms failed to properly configure hundreds of employee email accounts to ensure that messages were retained and reviewed. In addition, four of the subsidiaries did not have systems in place to retain certain types of emails, including emails sent to distribution lists, emails received as blind carbon copies, and “cloud” email (emails sent through third-party systems). Because the emails were not retained, they were not subject to supervisory review
In addition to retention violations, FINRA also found that four of the firms failed to review millions of emails that the firms’ email review software had flagged for supervisory review. Overall, supervisory principals did not evaluate nearly six million emails flagged for review because the email review software was not properly configured.
As this case makes clear, New York and New Jersey firms regulated by FINRA must follow strict guidelines for email archiving. In fact, in announcing the fines, Brad Bennett, executive vice president and chief of enforcement, made it clear that “email retention and review continues to be an important regulatory responsibility and an issue of concern for FINRA.”
Under FINRA’s Books & Records Rule (3110), member firms are required to make and preserve accounts, records, memoranda, books and correspondence in conformity with all applicable regulations, statements, and rules under SEC 17a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, record retention procedures must comply with SEC Rule 17a-4. Overall, keeping detailed records allows firms to clearly demonstrate that they have fulfilled both their investor and regulatory obligations.
If you have any questions about the case or would like to discuss your business’s email retention policies, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!