
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comBrokers and advisers increasingly rely on social media to connect with current and potential clients. After all, don’t we all prefer to read a 140-character Tweet promoting a new investment opportunity instead of digesting a 20-page prospectus filled with boilerplate and legalese?
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has previously issued social media guidance regarding how investment firms can take advantage of social media without running afoul of their compliance obligations. However, the existing guidance surrounding the use of social media has largely failed to keep pace with the popularity of social media, leaving a lot of “gray” areas and opportunities for compliance missteps.
In response, FINRA recently released a Regulatory Notice entitled, Social Media and Digital Communications: Guidance on Social Networking Websites and Business Communications. The guidance addresses the application of FINRA Rule 2210 to social media through a series of questions and answers.
FINRA Rule 2210, which governs communications to the public, requires that broker-dealers’ communications are fair and balanced and do not omit material information that would cause them to be misleading. FINRA previously addressed how the rule applies to posts to social media sites and other digital communications. In addition to recordkeeping obligations, FINRA has provided guidance on third-party social media posts and hyperlinks to third-party websites.
In Regulatory Notices 10-06 and 11-39, FINRA advised firms that they are obligated to retain records of digital communications that relate to their “business as such” and that determining whether a communication must be retained depends on its content and not upon the type of device or technology used to transmit the communication.
Regulatory Notice 10-06 that, as a general matter, posts by customers or other third parties on social media sites established by a firm or its personnel do not constitute communications with the public by the firm or its associated persons under Rule 2210. Exceptions include if the firm or an associated person has (1) paid for or been involved in the preparation of the content (referred to as “entanglement”) or (2) explicitly or implicitly endorsed or approved the content (referred to as “adoption”).
Regulatory Notice 11-39 advised that a member may not establish a link to any third-party site that the firm knows or has reason to know contains false or misleading content and may not include a link on its website if there are any red flags that indicate the linked site contains false or misleading content. It further stated firms can be liable under FINRA rules for content on a linked third-party site if the firm has adopted or has become entangled with its content.
In April, FINRA offered additional guidance, citing the proliferation of social media as well as requests from the industry for greater clarity on certain issues. The guidance consists of 12 questions and answers, with topic ranging from testimonials to native advertising. Below are several highlights:
Social media is a frequent area of concern during FINRA exams. FINRA has also conducted targeted social media “sweeps” in the past. Accordingly, member firms should thoroughly review the entire posting and discuss any compliance concerns with experienced counsel. Therefore, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Brokers and advisers increasingly rely on social media to connect with current and potential clients. After all, don’t we all prefer to read a 140-character Tweet promoting a new investment opportunity instead of digesting a 20-page prospectus filled with boilerplate and legalese?
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has previously issued social media guidance regarding how investment firms can take advantage of social media without running afoul of their compliance obligations. However, the existing guidance surrounding the use of social media has largely failed to keep pace with the popularity of social media, leaving a lot of “gray” areas and opportunities for compliance missteps.
In response, FINRA recently released a Regulatory Notice entitled, Social Media and Digital Communications: Guidance on Social Networking Websites and Business Communications. The guidance addresses the application of FINRA Rule 2210 to social media through a series of questions and answers.
FINRA Rule 2210, which governs communications to the public, requires that broker-dealers’ communications are fair and balanced and do not omit material information that would cause them to be misleading. FINRA previously addressed how the rule applies to posts to social media sites and other digital communications. In addition to recordkeeping obligations, FINRA has provided guidance on third-party social media posts and hyperlinks to third-party websites.
In Regulatory Notices 10-06 and 11-39, FINRA advised firms that they are obligated to retain records of digital communications that relate to their “business as such” and that determining whether a communication must be retained depends on its content and not upon the type of device or technology used to transmit the communication.
Regulatory Notice 10-06 that, as a general matter, posts by customers or other third parties on social media sites established by a firm or its personnel do not constitute communications with the public by the firm or its associated persons under Rule 2210. Exceptions include if the firm or an associated person has (1) paid for or been involved in the preparation of the content (referred to as “entanglement”) or (2) explicitly or implicitly endorsed or approved the content (referred to as “adoption”).
Regulatory Notice 11-39 advised that a member may not establish a link to any third-party site that the firm knows or has reason to know contains false or misleading content and may not include a link on its website if there are any red flags that indicate the linked site contains false or misleading content. It further stated firms can be liable under FINRA rules for content on a linked third-party site if the firm has adopted or has become entangled with its content.
In April, FINRA offered additional guidance, citing the proliferation of social media as well as requests from the industry for greater clarity on certain issues. The guidance consists of 12 questions and answers, with topic ranging from testimonials to native advertising. Below are several highlights:
Social media is a frequent area of concern during FINRA exams. FINRA has also conducted targeted social media “sweeps” in the past. Accordingly, member firms should thoroughly review the entire posting and discuss any compliance concerns with experienced counsel. Therefore, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!