The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is Taking Steps to Regulate PFAS in Drinking Water
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking steps to regulate the levels of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), which are also known as PFCs. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt announced the agency’s plans at a two-day National Leadership Summit dedicated to the two chemicals.
“It’s clear that this issue is a national priority,” Pruitt told attendees, which included representatives of 35 states, 20 agencies, 3 tribes, and dozens of other interested parties. “I’ll work with you to make sure we take action and not just raise awareness over these next couple months.”
Potential Hazards Posed by PFAS
In his remarks at the summit, Pruitt acknowledged the growing concern about PFAS’s “persistence, their durability, [sic] getting into the environment and impacting communities in an adverse way.” The chemicals, which were used in non-stick products, firefighting foam, and food packaging, have been linked to cancer, low birth weight, and other health conditions.
While U.S. manufacturers no longer use the chemicals, they can still be found in many public and private water systems. In a report that coincided with the summit, EWG concluded that an estimated 1,500 U.S. drinking water systems that supply 110 million people could have levels of PFAS that exceed what EWG deems safe. In some cases, contamination is higher than the lower standard currently offered by the EPA.
While the federal government does not currently regulate PFAS, the EPA’s health guidelines recommend a health limit of 70 parts per trillion of PFOA and PFOS combined. Many states have also implemented local regulations that set lower levels. In New Jersey, where high concentrations of the chemicals have been found, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) set a “Maximum Contaminant Limit” of 14 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA in 2017. It is currently the strictest standard in the United States.
EPA’s Four-Step PCAS Plan
At the summit, Pruitt announced that the EPA is preparing to take four “critical” steps to address PCAS. Below is the agency’s plan:
EPA will initiate steps to evaluate the need for a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for PFOA and PFOS. We will convene our federal partners and examine everything we know about PFOA and PFOS in drinking water.
EPA is beginning the necessary steps to propose designating PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous substances” through one of the available statutory mechanisms, including potentially CERCLA Section 102.
EPA is currently developing groundwater cleanup recommendations for PFOA and PFOS at contaminated sites and will complete this task by fall of this year.
EPA is taking action in close collaboration with our federal and state partners to develop toxicity values for GenX and PFBS.
Notably, the EPA’s plan will establish regulatory limits on the amount of PCAS allowed in drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). “We will take the next step under the Safe Drinking Water Act process to evaluate the need of a maximum contaminant level for PFOA and PFOS,” Pruitt stated. “It’s something that has been talked about for a number of years. The process needs to begin. The determination of an MCL is something that we will begin in earnest.”
It is also significant that the EPA is considering categorizing the two chemicals as “hazardous substances” under the federal Superfund law. Among other legal repercussions, bringing PCAS under CERCLA will create a federal cause of action to hold responsible parties liable for environmental remediation costs linked with PFAS releases.
What’s Next?
Given that the federal government hasn’t established any new drinking water standards in more than two decades, it is still uncertain whether the EPA’s plans will come to fruition. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the EPA’s actions on this issue and post updates as they become available.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
EPA Announces Plan to Address PFAS in Drinking Water
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is Taking Steps to Regulate PFAS in Drinking Water
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking steps to regulate the levels of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), which are also known as PFCs. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt announced the agency’s plans at a two-day National Leadership Summit dedicated to the two chemicals.
“It’s clear that this issue is a national priority,” Pruitt told attendees, which included representatives of 35 states, 20 agencies, 3 tribes, and dozens of other interested parties. “I’ll work with you to make sure we take action and not just raise awareness over these next couple months.”
Potential Hazards Posed by PFAS
In his remarks at the summit, Pruitt acknowledged the growing concern about PFAS’s “persistence, their durability, [sic] getting into the environment and impacting communities in an adverse way.” The chemicals, which were used in non-stick products, firefighting foam, and food packaging, have been linked to cancer, low birth weight, and other health conditions.
While U.S. manufacturers no longer use the chemicals, they can still be found in many public and private water systems. In a report that coincided with the summit, EWG concluded that an estimated 1,500 U.S. drinking water systems that supply 110 million people could have levels of PFAS that exceed what EWG deems safe. In some cases, contamination is higher than the lower standard currently offered by the EPA.
While the federal government does not currently regulate PFAS, the EPA’s health guidelines recommend a health limit of 70 parts per trillion of PFOA and PFOS combined. Many states have also implemented local regulations that set lower levels. In New Jersey, where high concentrations of the chemicals have been found, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) set a “Maximum Contaminant Limit” of 14 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA in 2017. It is currently the strictest standard in the United States.
EPA’s Four-Step PCAS Plan
At the summit, Pruitt announced that the EPA is preparing to take four “critical” steps to address PCAS. Below is the agency’s plan:
EPA will initiate steps to evaluate the need for a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for PFOA and PFOS. We will convene our federal partners and examine everything we know about PFOA and PFOS in drinking water.
EPA is beginning the necessary steps to propose designating PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous substances” through one of the available statutory mechanisms, including potentially CERCLA Section 102.
EPA is currently developing groundwater cleanup recommendations for PFOA and PFOS at contaminated sites and will complete this task by fall of this year.
EPA is taking action in close collaboration with our federal and state partners to develop toxicity values for GenX and PFBS.
Notably, the EPA’s plan will establish regulatory limits on the amount of PCAS allowed in drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). “We will take the next step under the Safe Drinking Water Act process to evaluate the need of a maximum contaminant level for PFOA and PFOS,” Pruitt stated. “It’s something that has been talked about for a number of years. The process needs to begin. The determination of an MCL is something that we will begin in earnest.”
It is also significant that the EPA is considering categorizing the two chemicals as “hazardous substances” under the federal Superfund law. Among other legal repercussions, bringing PCAS under CERCLA will create a federal cause of action to hold responsible parties liable for environmental remediation costs linked with PFAS releases.
What’s Next?
Given that the federal government hasn’t established any new drinking water standards in more than two decades, it is still uncertain whether the EPA’s plans will come to fruition. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the EPA’s actions on this issue and post updates as they become available.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
