On August 3, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the final version of its “Clean Power Plan,” which seeks to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants by fostering the creation of renewable energy.
It is estimated that power plants account for nearly 40 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States which is more than every car, truck, and plane in the U.S. combined. Although the final rule reflect the more than 4.3 million public comments received by the EPA, President Obama’s landmark environmental initiative still faces steep resistance from state governments, the energy industry and wider business community. Under the authority of Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA rules establish interim and final carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates for two subcategories of fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) — fossil fuel-fired electric steam generating units and natural gas-fired combined cycle generating units. Specifically, the Clean Power Plan aims to reduce national electricity sector emissions by an estimated 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.
The rules also provide for the development, submittal and implementation of state plans that implement the CO2 emission performance rates, either directly by means of source-specific emission standards or other requirements, or through measures that achieve equivalent CO2 reductions from the same group of EGUs. Finally, the rules aim to increase renewable energy sources by 28 percent by 2030.
Now that the rules are final, the Clean Power Plan is likely to face legal challenges. A coalition of energy companies and 15 states sought to block the rule while it was still in draft form, arguing that the CAA does not allow the EPA to regulate a pollutant at a plant that is already subject to emissions rules. The ambiguity regarding “double regulating” arose due to conflicting House and Senate amendments to the statute that were not reconciled prior to enactment in 1990.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an EPA rule regulating the emissions of mercury and other chemicals from electric power plants in Michigan v. EPA. By a vote of 5-4, the Court held that the EPA interpreted CAA amendments unreasonably when it deemed cost irrelevant to the decision to regulate power plants. The agency must now rewrite the rule while considering the costs of compliance.
While critics of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan contend that the EPA has overstepped its authority and that the new rules will increase energy prices, the plan could have an upside for companies that are seeking to become more “green.” Under the Clean Energy Incentive Program, the EPA will provide financial incentives for early investments in renewable energy (RE) generation and demand-side energy efficiency (EE) measures that generate carbon-free MWh or reduce end-use energy demand during 2020 and/or 2021.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
EPA Finalizes Controversial Carbon Emissions Rule
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
On August 3, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the final version of its “Clean Power Plan,” which seeks to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants by fostering the creation of renewable energy.
It is estimated that power plants account for nearly 40 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States which is more than every car, truck, and plane in the U.S. combined. Although the final rule reflect the more than 4.3 million public comments received by the EPA, President Obama’s landmark environmental initiative still faces steep resistance from state governments, the energy industry and wider business community. Under the authority of Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA rules establish interim and final carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates for two subcategories of fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) — fossil fuel-fired electric steam generating units and natural gas-fired combined cycle generating units. Specifically, the Clean Power Plan aims to reduce national electricity sector emissions by an estimated 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.
The rules also provide for the development, submittal and implementation of state plans that implement the CO2 emission performance rates, either directly by means of source-specific emission standards or other requirements, or through measures that achieve equivalent CO2 reductions from the same group of EGUs. Finally, the rules aim to increase renewable energy sources by 28 percent by 2030.
Now that the rules are final, the Clean Power Plan is likely to face legal challenges. A coalition of energy companies and 15 states sought to block the rule while it was still in draft form, arguing that the CAA does not allow the EPA to regulate a pollutant at a plant that is already subject to emissions rules. The ambiguity regarding “double regulating” arose due to conflicting House and Senate amendments to the statute that were not reconciled prior to enactment in 1990.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an EPA rule regulating the emissions of mercury and other chemicals from electric power plants in Michigan v. EPA. By a vote of 5-4, the Court held that the EPA interpreted CAA amendments unreasonably when it deemed cost irrelevant to the decision to regulate power plants. The agency must now rewrite the rule while considering the costs of compliance.
While critics of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan contend that the EPA has overstepped its authority and that the new rules will increase energy prices, the plan could have an upside for companies that are seeking to become more “green.” Under the Clean Energy Incentive Program, the EPA will provide financial incentives for early investments in renewable energy (RE) generation and demand-side energy efficiency (EE) measures that generate carbon-free MWh or reduce end-use energy demand during 2020 and/or 2021.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
