
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: February 7, 2019
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comSenate Bill 1073 has reached the desk of Gov. Phil Murphy that would allow New Jersey municipalities to establish local stormwater utilities, which could then charge property owners a fee based on “a fair and equitable approximation” of how much runoff is generated from their property.
While former Gov. Chris Christie vetoed similar legislation in the past, the odds of enactment are far better under Gov. Murphy. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) also publicly supports the legislation.
Under Senate Bill No. 1073, the governing body of any county or municipality could approve a resolution or ordinance that establishes a stormwater utility for the purposes of acquiring, constructing, improving, maintaining, and operating stormwater management systems. Similarly, the governing body or bodies of one or more municipalities that have established a municipal sewerage authority or utilities authority could request that the authority establish a stormwater utility.
Local governments that establish a stormwater utility would be authorized to charge and collect reasonable fees and other charges to recover the utility’s costs for stormwater management. Under the proposed bill, these fees and other charges would be collected from the owner or occupant (or both) of any real property from which originates stormwater runoff which enters the stormwater management system or the waters of the State.
Senate Bill 1073 provides that any stormwater management fee would be based on a “fair and equitable approximation of the proportionate contribution of stormwater from a real property.” The bill provides that municipalities that establish stormwater utilities must issue credits in certain circumstances, including a partial fee reduction in the form of a credit for any property that maintains and operates a stormwater management system that complies with the State and local stormwater management standards that were in place at the time the system was approved.
Under the legislation, the owner of a stormwater management system that complies with stormwater management standards that were in place at the time the system was approved may retain ownership of the system or may offer to dedicate it to the county, municipality, or authority. However, an owner who dedicates a system would still be liable for paying any applicable utility fees imposed under the bill.
Municipalities would also be required to provide a credit for any property that has installed and is operating and maintaining current stormwater best management practices that reduce, retain, or treat stormwater onsite. An additional credit would be required for any property which has installed and is operating and maintaining green infrastructure onsite. Notably, Senate Bill 1073 specifies that the credit for installing and operating stormwater best management practices applies only if current best management practices are used.
With respect to enforcement, the proposed stormwater utility bill provides counties, municipalities, and authorities with several enforcement mechanisms, which are similar to the enforcement mechanisms that currently exist for water and sewer utilities. Specifically, interest would accrue on the unpaid fees and other charges; the unpaid balance and any accrued interest would constitute a lien on the parcel which would be enforced in the same manner as delinquent property taxes and municipal charges; and the unpaid balance and any accrued interest could be recovered in a civil action, along with attorney’s fees.
While most agree that New Jersey needs to better address stormwater runoff, critics of Senate Bill 1073 maintain that its proposed solution amounts to a “rain tax” on businesses that are often already doing their part to curb runoff. They further maintain that local cities and towns would have too much discretion in determining what fees to impose.
“For many businesses, the fees authorized in this bill would amount to double taxation,” NJBIA Vice President of Government Affairs Tony Bawidamann said. “Companies would be assessed a fee by a local stormwater authority, even if they already have a [stormwater] permit. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that these fees will be used for their intended purposes.”
The New Jersey Legislature passed the bill on January 31, 2019. Gov. Phil Murphy has up to 45 days (this Sunday) to sign or reject the bill. If no action is taken by then, the bill becomes law. Provided Gov. Murphy does sign it into law, the NJDEP would then draft the regulations needed to implement it, which may take time. The next step would be for local municipalities to determine whether to create stormwater utilities. Given the importance of this issue for New Jersey businesses, the attorneys of the Environmental and Land Use Law practice group at Scarinci Hollenbeck will keep you posted on any updates.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Senate Bill 1073 has reached the desk of Gov. Phil Murphy that would allow New Jersey municipalities to establish local stormwater utilities, which could then charge property owners a fee based on “a fair and equitable approximation” of how much runoff is generated from their property.
While former Gov. Chris Christie vetoed similar legislation in the past, the odds of enactment are far better under Gov. Murphy. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) also publicly supports the legislation.
Under Senate Bill No. 1073, the governing body of any county or municipality could approve a resolution or ordinance that establishes a stormwater utility for the purposes of acquiring, constructing, improving, maintaining, and operating stormwater management systems. Similarly, the governing body or bodies of one or more municipalities that have established a municipal sewerage authority or utilities authority could request that the authority establish a stormwater utility.
Local governments that establish a stormwater utility would be authorized to charge and collect reasonable fees and other charges to recover the utility’s costs for stormwater management. Under the proposed bill, these fees and other charges would be collected from the owner or occupant (or both) of any real property from which originates stormwater runoff which enters the stormwater management system or the waters of the State.
Senate Bill 1073 provides that any stormwater management fee would be based on a “fair and equitable approximation of the proportionate contribution of stormwater from a real property.” The bill provides that municipalities that establish stormwater utilities must issue credits in certain circumstances, including a partial fee reduction in the form of a credit for any property that maintains and operates a stormwater management system that complies with the State and local stormwater management standards that were in place at the time the system was approved.
Under the legislation, the owner of a stormwater management system that complies with stormwater management standards that were in place at the time the system was approved may retain ownership of the system or may offer to dedicate it to the county, municipality, or authority. However, an owner who dedicates a system would still be liable for paying any applicable utility fees imposed under the bill.
Municipalities would also be required to provide a credit for any property that has installed and is operating and maintaining current stormwater best management practices that reduce, retain, or treat stormwater onsite. An additional credit would be required for any property which has installed and is operating and maintaining green infrastructure onsite. Notably, Senate Bill 1073 specifies that the credit for installing and operating stormwater best management practices applies only if current best management practices are used.
With respect to enforcement, the proposed stormwater utility bill provides counties, municipalities, and authorities with several enforcement mechanisms, which are similar to the enforcement mechanisms that currently exist for water and sewer utilities. Specifically, interest would accrue on the unpaid fees and other charges; the unpaid balance and any accrued interest would constitute a lien on the parcel which would be enforced in the same manner as delinquent property taxes and municipal charges; and the unpaid balance and any accrued interest could be recovered in a civil action, along with attorney’s fees.
While most agree that New Jersey needs to better address stormwater runoff, critics of Senate Bill 1073 maintain that its proposed solution amounts to a “rain tax” on businesses that are often already doing their part to curb runoff. They further maintain that local cities and towns would have too much discretion in determining what fees to impose.
“For many businesses, the fees authorized in this bill would amount to double taxation,” NJBIA Vice President of Government Affairs Tony Bawidamann said. “Companies would be assessed a fee by a local stormwater authority, even if they already have a [stormwater] permit. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that these fees will be used for their intended purposes.”
The New Jersey Legislature passed the bill on January 31, 2019. Gov. Phil Murphy has up to 45 days (this Sunday) to sign or reject the bill. If no action is taken by then, the bill becomes law. Provided Gov. Murphy does sign it into law, the NJDEP would then draft the regulations needed to implement it, which may take time. The next step would be for local municipalities to determine whether to create stormwater utilities. Given the importance of this issue for New Jersey businesses, the attorneys of the Environmental and Land Use Law practice group at Scarinci Hollenbeck will keep you posted on any updates.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!