How CEQ’s Proposed Overhaul of NEPA Regulations May Impact NJ Developers
The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is seeking to overhaul its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations. NEPA requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of proposed actions as part of agencies’ decision-making processes. Meanwhile, CEQ is an agency within the Executive Office of the President tasked with administering Federal agency implementation of NEPA.
In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CEQ maintains that changes are needed to “facilitate more efficient, effective, and timely NEPA reviews by Federal agencies in connection with proposals for agency action.” CEQ has not comprehensively updated its regulations since their promulgation in 1978, and, according to CEQ, implementation of NEPA has become increasingly complex and time consuming for federal agencies, project applicants, and those seeking permits or approvals from the Federal government. It found that the average length of an environmental impact statement is over 600 pages and that the average time for Federal agencies to complete such NEPA reviews is four and a half years.
“CEQ is proposing practical changes to modernize environmental reviews and make the process more predictable and efficient. The proposed rule would ensure Federal agencies consider the significant environmental impacts of proposed projects and activities while accelerating the process so that timely decisions are made on major infrastructure and other projects affecting Americans’ everyday lives. Americans deserve a government that is efficient, effective, and responsive,” CEQ Chairman Mary B. Neumayr said in a press statement.
National Environmental Policy Act
Congress enacted NEPA to establish a national policy for the environment. NEPA establishes procedural requirements, applying that national policy to proposals for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment by requiring Federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on: (1) The environmental impact of the proposed action; (2) any adverse effects that cannot be avoided; (3) alternatives to the proposed action; (4) the relationship between local short-term uses of man’s environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and (5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action. NEPA does not include a private right of action and specifies no remedies. Rather, challenges to agency action alleging noncompliance with NEPA procedures are brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In 2017, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13807 establishing a One Federal Decision policy. It established a two-year goal for completing environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects and directed CEQ to consider revisions to modernize its regulations. In 2018, CEQ issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) requesting comment on potential updates to its regulations. It used the comments its received to inform its proposed rule. As detailed by CEQ, some of its proposed revisions to the NEPA Regulations include:
Modernize, Simplify and Accelerate the NEPA Process
Establish presumptive time limits of two years for completion of environmental impact statements (EISs) and one year for completion of environmental assessments (EAs)
Specify presumptive page limits
Require joint schedules, a single EIS, and a single record of decision (ROD), where appropriate, for EISs involving multiple agencies
Strengthen the role of the lead agency and require senior agency officials to timely resolve disputes to avoid delays
Promote use of modern technologies for information sharing and public outreach
Clarify Terms, Application and Scope of NEPA Review
Provide direction regarding the threshold consideration of whether NEPA applies to a particular action
Require earlier solicitation of input from the public to ensure informed decision-making by federal agencies
Require comments to be specific and timely to ensure appropriate consideration
Require agencies to summarize alternatives, analyses, and information submitted by commenters and to certify consideration of submitted information in the ROD
Simplify the definition of environmental “effects” and clarify that effects must be reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close causal relationship to the proposed action
State that analysis of cumulative effects is not required under NEPA
Clarify that “major Federal action” does not include non-discretionary decisions and non-Federal projects (those with minimal Federal funding or involvement)
Clarify that “reasonable alternatives” requiring consideration must be technically and economically feasible
Enhance Coordination with States, Tribes, and Localities
Reduce duplication by facilitating use of documents required by other statutes or prepared by State, Tribal, and local agencies to comply with NEPA
Ensure appropriate consultation with affected Tribal governments and agencies
Eliminate the provisions in the current regulations that limit Tribal interest to reservations
Reduce Unnecessary Burdens, Delays
Facilitate use of efficient reviews (categorical exclusions (CEs), environmental assessments)
Allow agencies to establish procedures for adopting other agencies’ CEs
Allow applicants/contractors to assume a greater role in preparing EISs under the supervision of an agency
What’s Next?
CEQ is requesting public comment on the NPRM. It will hold public hearings on the following dates: 1. February 11, 2020, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO; and 2. February 25, 2020, U.S. Department of the Interior, Yates Auditorium, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC.
CEQ is also accepting written comments, which may be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments must be submitted on or before March 10, 2020.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
How CEQ’s Proposed Overhaul of NEPA Regulations May Impact NJ Developers
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
How CEQ’s Proposed Overhaul of NEPA Regulations May Impact NJ Developers
The White House’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is seeking to overhaul its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-implementing regulations. NEPA requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of proposed actions as part of agencies’ decision-making processes. Meanwhile, CEQ is an agency within the Executive Office of the President tasked with administering Federal agency implementation of NEPA.
In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CEQ maintains that changes are needed to “facilitate more efficient, effective, and timely NEPA reviews by Federal agencies in connection with proposals for agency action.” CEQ has not comprehensively updated its regulations since their promulgation in 1978, and, according to CEQ, implementation of NEPA has become increasingly complex and time consuming for federal agencies, project applicants, and those seeking permits or approvals from the Federal government. It found that the average length of an environmental impact statement is over 600 pages and that the average time for Federal agencies to complete such NEPA reviews is four and a half years.
“CEQ is proposing practical changes to modernize environmental reviews and make the process more predictable and efficient. The proposed rule would ensure Federal agencies consider the significant environmental impacts of proposed projects and activities while accelerating the process so that timely decisions are made on major infrastructure and other projects affecting Americans’ everyday lives. Americans deserve a government that is efficient, effective, and responsive,” CEQ Chairman Mary B. Neumayr said in a press statement.
National Environmental Policy Act
Congress enacted NEPA to establish a national policy for the environment. NEPA establishes procedural requirements, applying that national policy to proposals for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment by requiring Federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on: (1) The environmental impact of the proposed action; (2) any adverse effects that cannot be avoided; (3) alternatives to the proposed action; (4) the relationship between local short-term uses of man’s environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and (5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action. NEPA does not include a private right of action and specifies no remedies. Rather, challenges to agency action alleging noncompliance with NEPA procedures are brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In 2017, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13807 establishing a One Federal Decision policy. It established a two-year goal for completing environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects and directed CEQ to consider revisions to modernize its regulations. In 2018, CEQ issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) requesting comment on potential updates to its regulations. It used the comments its received to inform its proposed rule. As detailed by CEQ, some of its proposed revisions to the NEPA Regulations include:
Modernize, Simplify and Accelerate the NEPA Process
Establish presumptive time limits of two years for completion of environmental impact statements (EISs) and one year for completion of environmental assessments (EAs)
Specify presumptive page limits
Require joint schedules, a single EIS, and a single record of decision (ROD), where appropriate, for EISs involving multiple agencies
Strengthen the role of the lead agency and require senior agency officials to timely resolve disputes to avoid delays
Promote use of modern technologies for information sharing and public outreach
Clarify Terms, Application and Scope of NEPA Review
Provide direction regarding the threshold consideration of whether NEPA applies to a particular action
Require earlier solicitation of input from the public to ensure informed decision-making by federal agencies
Require comments to be specific and timely to ensure appropriate consideration
Require agencies to summarize alternatives, analyses, and information submitted by commenters and to certify consideration of submitted information in the ROD
Simplify the definition of environmental “effects” and clarify that effects must be reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close causal relationship to the proposed action
State that analysis of cumulative effects is not required under NEPA
Clarify that “major Federal action” does not include non-discretionary decisions and non-Federal projects (those with minimal Federal funding or involvement)
Clarify that “reasonable alternatives” requiring consideration must be technically and economically feasible
Enhance Coordination with States, Tribes, and Localities
Reduce duplication by facilitating use of documents required by other statutes or prepared by State, Tribal, and local agencies to comply with NEPA
Ensure appropriate consultation with affected Tribal governments and agencies
Eliminate the provisions in the current regulations that limit Tribal interest to reservations
Reduce Unnecessary Burdens, Delays
Facilitate use of efficient reviews (categorical exclusions (CEs), environmental assessments)
Allow agencies to establish procedures for adopting other agencies’ CEs
Allow applicants/contractors to assume a greater role in preparing EISs under the supervision of an agency
What’s Next?
CEQ is requesting public comment on the NPRM. It will hold public hearings on the following dates: 1. February 11, 2020, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO; and 2. February 25, 2020, U.S. Department of the Interior, Yates Auditorium, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC.
CEQ is also accepting written comments, which may be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments must be submitted on or before March 10, 2020.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
