In the annals of securities law, the maxim repeated more than any Geico commercial is: disclosure, disclosure, disclosure.
Just as location is a dominant force in real estate investing, full disclosure of material information that a reasonable investor would be entitled to know before making an investment decision is the bedrock of our federal securities laws. Any company raising money from investors, sending information to shareholders or filing reports with the SEC does so pursuant to rules that have been enunciated in statutes and carved into our court systems’ decisions for many decades:
One reason investors and shareholders are provided with lengthy and detailed reports and SEC filings is that the federal and state securities laws mandate detailed disclosures and then the regulators review disclosures in determining whether or not compliance has occurred. Material omissions can be sanctioned just as heavily as outright false statements. Did the issuing company (or selling shareholder) adequately disclose the material information that an investor would reasonable want to know in forming an opinion with regard to the purchase or sale of the security? If not, liability could ensue based upon sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, under the fraud provisions of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, the Martin Act in New York, or under case law decisions that have evolved both under federal and state statutes and through the common law that has become defined through thousands of court decisions.
Any investor would want to know if the CEO/Founder had previously been convicted of fraud or had recently made bad decisions that resulted in the bankruptcy of a prior company. If losing a threatened litigation would material affect the company’s value or chances for success, who would not want to know the details of the litigation in considering a purchase (or sale) of the company’s stock?
That is probably not material, and, therefore, probably not required to be disclosed. But what if the accident occurred because the COO was driving under the influence of a narcotic? And, what if it was his second accident under such circumstances? That would certainly be material; a reasonable investor would want to know what was being done and what was planned for dealing with this type of situation in which it is likely that there will be a serious consequence affecting the company’s management and operations.
Any company raising funds from investors, whether in a private placement, through crowd funding or in a public offering, needs to review all of the material matters and issues that are, or could create, serious risk factors for the company. Disclosure of the material facts helps to insulate the company against future claims from investors, in the event things do not work out as planned. And, investors who are not tolerant of risk are weeded out in the process, which, in the long run, is better for the company and its management.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Disclosure, Disclosure, Disclosure
Author: Dan Brecher
In the annals of securities law, the maxim repeated more than any Geico commercial is: disclosure, disclosure, disclosure.
Just as location is a dominant force in real estate investing, full disclosure of material information that a reasonable investor would be entitled to know before making an investment decision is the bedrock of our federal securities laws. Any company raising money from investors, sending information to shareholders or filing reports with the SEC does so pursuant to rules that have been enunciated in statutes and carved into our court systems’ decisions for many decades:
One reason investors and shareholders are provided with lengthy and detailed reports and SEC filings is that the federal and state securities laws mandate detailed disclosures and then the regulators review disclosures in determining whether or not compliance has occurred. Material omissions can be sanctioned just as heavily as outright false statements. Did the issuing company (or selling shareholder) adequately disclose the material information that an investor would reasonable want to know in forming an opinion with regard to the purchase or sale of the security? If not, liability could ensue based upon sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, under the fraud provisions of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, the Martin Act in New York, or under case law decisions that have evolved both under federal and state statutes and through the common law that has become defined through thousands of court decisions.
Any investor would want to know if the CEO/Founder had previously been convicted of fraud or had recently made bad decisions that resulted in the bankruptcy of a prior company. If losing a threatened litigation would material affect the company’s value or chances for success, who would not want to know the details of the litigation in considering a purchase (or sale) of the company’s stock?
That is probably not material, and, therefore, probably not required to be disclosed. But what if the accident occurred because the COO was driving under the influence of a narcotic? And, what if it was his second accident under such circumstances? That would certainly be material; a reasonable investor would want to know what was being done and what was planned for dealing with this type of situation in which it is likely that there will be a serious consequence affecting the company’s management and operations.
Any company raising funds from investors, whether in a private placement, through crowd funding or in a public offering, needs to review all of the material matters and issues that are, or could create, serious risk factors for the company. Disclosure of the material facts helps to insulate the company against future claims from investors, in the event things do not work out as planned. And, investors who are not tolerant of risk are weeded out in the process, which, in the long run, is better for the company and its management.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
