Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Department of Justice Calling for Rule Change to Pursue Foreign Businesses
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 24, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The federal government has recently stepped up its efforts to pursue legal action against foreign businesses that have broken U.S. laws. After a series of legal setbacks, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking to amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Companies and individuals may be held liable to breaking U.S. criminal laws without ever stepping foot in this country. However, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure require the government to serve an organizational defendant by delivering a summons to a representative of the entity as well as mailing the summons to the defendant’s last-known domestic address or principal place of business. Problems arise when a foreign company does not maintain either an office or mailing address in the United States.
Most recently, the rules threatened an economic espionage case against four Chinese corporations accused of purchasing DuPont trade secrets. A similar issue arose in the criminal copyright infringement case against Megaupload and its founder, Kim Dotcom.
Accordingly, the DOJ has recommended that Rule 4 be amended to remove the requirement that a copy of the summons be sent to the organization’s last known mailing address within the district or principal place of business within the United States. The agency has also requested that Rule 4 be amended to provide the means to serve a summons upon an organization located outside the United States.
As explained by the DOJ, “The proposed amendments are necessary to ensure that organizations that commit domestic offenses are not able to avoid liability through the simple expedients of declining to maintain an agent, place of business and mailing address within the United States.”
Prosecutors maintain that it would be absurd to let foreign companies evade the U.S. justice system by simply failing to open a post office box. However, the remedy that they are requesting—amending the rules of criminal procedure—is also a tall order.
If you have any questions about the DOJ’s proposal or how it may impact your operations, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Department of Justice Calling for Rule Change to Pursue Foreign Businesses
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The federal government has recently stepped up its efforts to pursue legal action against foreign businesses that have broken U.S. laws. After a series of legal setbacks, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking to amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Companies and individuals may be held liable to breaking U.S. criminal laws without ever stepping foot in this country. However, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure require the government to serve an organizational defendant by delivering a summons to a representative of the entity as well as mailing the summons to the defendant’s last-known domestic address or principal place of business. Problems arise when a foreign company does not maintain either an office or mailing address in the United States.
Most recently, the rules threatened an economic espionage case against four Chinese corporations accused of purchasing DuPont trade secrets. A similar issue arose in the criminal copyright infringement case against Megaupload and its founder, Kim Dotcom.
Accordingly, the DOJ has recommended that Rule 4 be amended to remove the requirement that a copy of the summons be sent to the organization’s last known mailing address within the district or principal place of business within the United States. The agency has also requested that Rule 4 be amended to provide the means to serve a summons upon an organization located outside the United States.
As explained by the DOJ, “The proposed amendments are necessary to ensure that organizations that commit domestic offenses are not able to avoid liability through the simple expedients of declining to maintain an agent, place of business and mailing address within the United States.”
Prosecutors maintain that it would be absurd to let foreign companies evade the U.S. justice system by simply failing to open a post office box. However, the remedy that they are requesting—amending the rules of criminal procedure—is also a tall order.
If you have any questions about the DOJ’s proposal or how it may impact your operations, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.