Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

CCA 201336018 / Collateral Consequences for Foreign Tax Purposes

Author: James F. McDonough

Date: January 21, 2014

Key Contacts

Back

The payment of interest, other than in currency, between related corporations carries consequences for the calculation of the foreign tax credit (FTC).

Chief Counsel Advice 201336018 (CCA) addresses such a situation in a U.S. consolidated group setting. The facts in the CCA are a U.S. parent corporation (P) owned all of the shares of two U.S. corporations (US-1 and US-2). P loaned US-1 funds that US-1 re-loaned to US-2.  US-2 then transferred these funds down its chain of foreign subsidiary companies to finance the acquisition of foreign assets.

The terms of the loan agreement gave US-2 the option to pay interest either in currency baws on a LIBOR formula or in units of a foreign limited partnership (“FLP”) that is treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes.  Internal Revenue Code §163(l) disallows a deduction for interest paid or accrued using equity and classifies the equity as “disqualified debt.”  Payment of interest other than in currency impacts the U.S. consolidated return and the calculation of the foreign tax credit.  Unfortunately, the impact can be different.

The consolidated return rules treat the non-deductible interest paid to the recipient as tax-exempt interest and the basis in the stock of the subsidiary is increased by the payment.  No doubt the author of the CCA considered the possibility of inflating basis using FLP units to make payments. If that were to occur, the basis in the stock of the subsidiary would be overstated without a basis adjustment to accommodate the goal of §163(l). Unfortunately, these rules treat tax-exempt interest and interest on disqualified debt for purposes differently for purposes of the basis adjustment.

The next complication comes from the impact of basis adjustments upon the calculation of the foreign tax credit (FTC).  Simply stated, the FTC is limited to the U.S. tax that would be imposed upon foreign source income. In order to calculate foreign source income, we must deduct (a) those expenses and losses which can be definitely allocated.  and (b) then deduct a ratable allocation of other expenses which cannot be definitely allocated. Interest cannot be definitely allocated because it is considered fungible. Rather, interest is allocated between domestic and foreign source income on the basis of either income or assets, using either fair market value or tax book basis.

The taxpayer in the CCA took the position that the interest disallowed also requires the basis in the shares of the foreign company to be reduced to maintain consistency with the consolidated return rule.

What was at stake for the taxpayer?

The reduction in the basis of foreign asset (FLP units) would reduce the basis of  foreign assets that would receive an allocation of interest. A lesser allocation of interest would increase foreign source net income and the foreign tax credit limitation.  The higher limitation would increase the foreign tax credit available to offset U.S. income tax.

The regulation under 1.861-12T(f) permits the reduction of basis for purposes of the allocation where the basis of the asset is funded by disallowed interest. The CCA concludes that the taxpayer did not satisfy the “in connection with” requirement. The CCA stated that the provision of the loan agreement permitting payment in the form of stock was gratuitous .

Clearly, the Service’s view limits the use of the exceptions under 1.861-12T.  The CCA  reduces the taxpayer’s ability to increase its FTC which increases its tax bill.  It is unclear whether the CCA will be challenged by taxpayer in an administrative appeal of any assessment or in Tax Court.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda post image

Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda

On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda"
What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements? post image

What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?

If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?"
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage? post image

Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?

Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?"
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer post image

Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer

Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]

Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Link to post with title - "Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer"
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC post image

Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC

Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Link to post with title - "Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC"
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses post image

Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses

Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

CCA 201336018 / Collateral Consequences for Foreign Tax Purposes

Author: James F. McDonough

The payment of interest, other than in currency, between related corporations carries consequences for the calculation of the foreign tax credit (FTC).

Chief Counsel Advice 201336018 (CCA) addresses such a situation in a U.S. consolidated group setting. The facts in the CCA are a U.S. parent corporation (P) owned all of the shares of two U.S. corporations (US-1 and US-2). P loaned US-1 funds that US-1 re-loaned to US-2.  US-2 then transferred these funds down its chain of foreign subsidiary companies to finance the acquisition of foreign assets.

The terms of the loan agreement gave US-2 the option to pay interest either in currency baws on a LIBOR formula or in units of a foreign limited partnership (“FLP”) that is treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes.  Internal Revenue Code §163(l) disallows a deduction for interest paid or accrued using equity and classifies the equity as “disqualified debt.”  Payment of interest other than in currency impacts the U.S. consolidated return and the calculation of the foreign tax credit.  Unfortunately, the impact can be different.

The consolidated return rules treat the non-deductible interest paid to the recipient as tax-exempt interest and the basis in the stock of the subsidiary is increased by the payment.  No doubt the author of the CCA considered the possibility of inflating basis using FLP units to make payments. If that were to occur, the basis in the stock of the subsidiary would be overstated without a basis adjustment to accommodate the goal of §163(l). Unfortunately, these rules treat tax-exempt interest and interest on disqualified debt for purposes differently for purposes of the basis adjustment.

The next complication comes from the impact of basis adjustments upon the calculation of the foreign tax credit (FTC).  Simply stated, the FTC is limited to the U.S. tax that would be imposed upon foreign source income. In order to calculate foreign source income, we must deduct (a) those expenses and losses which can be definitely allocated.  and (b) then deduct a ratable allocation of other expenses which cannot be definitely allocated. Interest cannot be definitely allocated because it is considered fungible. Rather, interest is allocated between domestic and foreign source income on the basis of either income or assets, using either fair market value or tax book basis.

The taxpayer in the CCA took the position that the interest disallowed also requires the basis in the shares of the foreign company to be reduced to maintain consistency with the consolidated return rule.

What was at stake for the taxpayer?

The reduction in the basis of foreign asset (FLP units) would reduce the basis of  foreign assets that would receive an allocation of interest. A lesser allocation of interest would increase foreign source net income and the foreign tax credit limitation.  The higher limitation would increase the foreign tax credit available to offset U.S. income tax.

The regulation under 1.861-12T(f) permits the reduction of basis for purposes of the allocation where the basis of the asset is funded by disallowed interest. The CCA concludes that the taxpayer did not satisfy the “in connection with” requirement. The CCA stated that the provision of the loan agreement permitting payment in the form of stock was gratuitous .

Clearly, the Service’s view limits the use of the exceptions under 1.861-12T.  The CCA  reduces the taxpayer’s ability to increase its FTC which increases its tax bill.  It is unclear whether the CCA will be challenged by taxpayer in an administrative appeal of any assessment or in Tax Court.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!

Please select a category(s) below: