Mars Wrigley is the latest candy manufacturer to file suit against companies for selling cannabis-infused edibles in packaging that mimics its famous brands...
Mars Wrigley is the latest candy manufacturer to file suit against companies for selling cannabis-infused edibles in packaging that mimics its famous brands. In its suit, Mars Wrigley alleges that the defendants are infringing on Wrigley’s trademarks by selling THC-infused products that illegally resemble Skittles, Life Savers, and Starbursts.
“The lawsuit is intended to stop the illegal and dangerous misuse of its world-famous trademarks in the marketing and sale of THC-infused edibles, which resemble Mars Wrigley’s genuine products such as Skittles and Starburst,” Mars Wrigley said in a statement. “Mars Wrigley does not manufacture or sell any products containing THC.”
The Rise of Cannabis Edibles
Edibles are one of the fastest-growing segments of the cannabis industry. In fact, edibles have outperformed the rest of the cannabis market by 29 percent in the last three months compared with the same period in 2020.
As cannabis edible sales have grown, candy corporations are taking notice. So, while cannabis companies may have been able to fly under the radar several years or so, they are now receiving cease and desist letters for misusing well-known candy company trademarks and copyrights. According to the New York Times, lawsuits have been brought by the Hershey Company (against TinctureBelle for products resembling Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, Heath bars, Almond Joy bars and York peppermint patties), Mondelez International (against a company selling Stoney Patch Kids) and Ferrara Candy Company (against a store selling Medicated Nerds Rope).
Mars Wrigley Trademark Lawsuits
In May, Mars Wrigley filed two lawsuits involving infringing edible products, including “Starburst Gummies” and “Cannaburst Gummies.” According to the suit against Packaging Papi, LLC, the defendants misappropriated Wrigley’s trademarks for use on packaging that is marketed and sold empty to third-party cannabis retailers. These cannabis retailers fill the packaging with edible products that are often genuine Skittles or Starburst candies infused with or otherwise containing THC. The edible products are then marketed and sold to consumers without Wrigley’s authorization.
“Defendants’ unauthorized and infringing use of Wrigley’s famous trademarks endangers the public and is likely to cause confusion and damage Wrigley’s valuable rights,” the complaint states. “Defendants’ unlawful actions are a danger to children and adults who may mistakenly ingest the edible cannabis products thinking them to be Wrigley’s genuine SKITTLES® or STARBURST® candies, when they are not, and unknowingly and unwillingly subjecting themselves to doses of THC, sometimes in very large and unsafe quantities.”
Mars Wrigley filed a similar suit against 2020Ediblez. It also alleges that the company mimics its packaging and infringes the trademarks of its Skittles, Starburst, and Life Savers brands.
Mars Wrigley filed a third lawsuit against Terphogz, a California cannabis company that markets the Zkittlez strain and brand of cannabis. Terphogz doesn’t sell edibles, but rather promotes the popular cannabis strain via t-shirts, jars, and other products.
The suit alleges that Terphogz’s ZKITTLEZ Marks are substantially identical in sight, sound, meaning, and commercial impression to Wrigley’s SKITTLES Marks. According to the complaint, “Terphogz uses the same distinctive red color featured on packages of SKITTLES candy and the same colors of SKITTLES candy in connection with advertising, selling, and distributing its ZKITTLEZ goods.” Mars Wrigley further contends that Terphogz’s use of the ZKITTLEZ Marks is likely to cause confusion as to the source and sponsorship of Terphogz’s goods and to impair the distinctiveness of Wrigley’s SKITTLES Marks.
Mars Wrigley is seeking a permanent injunction on the sale of any products using Zkittlez marks and the destruction of any products or merchandise using the marks. Wrigley also requested to have the Zkittlez website surrendered to it and all social media accounts be disabled. The candy company also wants Terphogz to withdraw its trademark application for the ZKITTLEZ brand.
Marketing Considerations for Cannabis Companies
As the Mars Wrigley lawsuits highlight, companies must be mindful of intellectual property concerns when marketing cannabis products. As the industry gains legitimacy, it is coming under increased scrutiny, particularly from major brands who will not tolerate their trademarks being used to promote cannabis products.
Before marketing cannabis products, it is also imperative to understand the advertising restrictions for cannabis products, which are significant and vary from state to state. Most states prohibit engaging in advertising or marketing directed towards children. Many also restrict the type of packaging that may be used and prohibit the use of images that may be attractive to children.
As this area of law continues to develop, we encourage both brand owners and cannabis companies to stay informed about legal updates and work with experienced counsel when developing IP strategies.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Ron Bienstock, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Candy Brands Filing Trademark Suits Due to Cannabis Copycats
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock, Daniel T. McKillop
Mars Wrigley is the latest candy manufacturer to file suit against companies for selling cannabis-infused edibles in packaging that mimics its famous brands...
Mars Wrigley is the latest candy manufacturer to file suit against companies for selling cannabis-infused edibles in packaging that mimics its famous brands. In its suit, Mars Wrigley alleges that the defendants are infringing on Wrigley’s trademarks by selling THC-infused products that illegally resemble Skittles, Life Savers, and Starbursts.
“The lawsuit is intended to stop the illegal and dangerous misuse of its world-famous trademarks in the marketing and sale of THC-infused edibles, which resemble Mars Wrigley’s genuine products such as Skittles and Starburst,” Mars Wrigley said in a statement. “Mars Wrigley does not manufacture or sell any products containing THC.”
The Rise of Cannabis Edibles
Edibles are one of the fastest-growing segments of the cannabis industry. In fact, edibles have outperformed the rest of the cannabis market by 29 percent in the last three months compared with the same period in 2020.
As cannabis edible sales have grown, candy corporations are taking notice. So, while cannabis companies may have been able to fly under the radar several years or so, they are now receiving cease and desist letters for misusing well-known candy company trademarks and copyrights. According to the New York Times, lawsuits have been brought by the Hershey Company (against TinctureBelle for products resembling Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, Heath bars, Almond Joy bars and York peppermint patties), Mondelez International (against a company selling Stoney Patch Kids) and Ferrara Candy Company (against a store selling Medicated Nerds Rope).
Mars Wrigley Trademark Lawsuits
In May, Mars Wrigley filed two lawsuits involving infringing edible products, including “Starburst Gummies” and “Cannaburst Gummies.” According to the suit against Packaging Papi, LLC, the defendants misappropriated Wrigley’s trademarks for use on packaging that is marketed and sold empty to third-party cannabis retailers. These cannabis retailers fill the packaging with edible products that are often genuine Skittles or Starburst candies infused with or otherwise containing THC. The edible products are then marketed and sold to consumers without Wrigley’s authorization.
“Defendants’ unauthorized and infringing use of Wrigley’s famous trademarks endangers the public and is likely to cause confusion and damage Wrigley’s valuable rights,” the complaint states. “Defendants’ unlawful actions are a danger to children and adults who may mistakenly ingest the edible cannabis products thinking them to be Wrigley’s genuine SKITTLES® or STARBURST® candies, when they are not, and unknowingly and unwillingly subjecting themselves to doses of THC, sometimes in very large and unsafe quantities.”
Mars Wrigley filed a similar suit against 2020Ediblez. It also alleges that the company mimics its packaging and infringes the trademarks of its Skittles, Starburst, and Life Savers brands.
Mars Wrigley filed a third lawsuit against Terphogz, a California cannabis company that markets the Zkittlez strain and brand of cannabis. Terphogz doesn’t sell edibles, but rather promotes the popular cannabis strain via t-shirts, jars, and other products.
The suit alleges that Terphogz’s ZKITTLEZ Marks are substantially identical in sight, sound, meaning, and commercial impression to Wrigley’s SKITTLES Marks. According to the complaint, “Terphogz uses the same distinctive red color featured on packages of SKITTLES candy and the same colors of SKITTLES candy in connection with advertising, selling, and distributing its ZKITTLEZ goods.” Mars Wrigley further contends that Terphogz’s use of the ZKITTLEZ Marks is likely to cause confusion as to the source and sponsorship of Terphogz’s goods and to impair the distinctiveness of Wrigley’s SKITTLES Marks.
Mars Wrigley is seeking a permanent injunction on the sale of any products using Zkittlez marks and the destruction of any products or merchandise using the marks. Wrigley also requested to have the Zkittlez website surrendered to it and all social media accounts be disabled. The candy company also wants Terphogz to withdraw its trademark application for the ZKITTLEZ brand.
Marketing Considerations for Cannabis Companies
As the Mars Wrigley lawsuits highlight, companies must be mindful of intellectual property concerns when marketing cannabis products. As the industry gains legitimacy, it is coming under increased scrutiny, particularly from major brands who will not tolerate their trademarks being used to promote cannabis products.
Before marketing cannabis products, it is also imperative to understand the advertising restrictions for cannabis products, which are significant and vary from state to state. Most states prohibit engaging in advertising or marketing directed towards children. Many also restrict the type of packaging that may be used and prohibit the use of images that may be attractive to children.
As this area of law continues to develop, we encourage both brand owners and cannabis companies to stay informed about legal updates and work with experienced counsel when developing IP strategies.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Ron Bienstock, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
