As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business News Blog, Todd Newman, a portfolio manager at Diamondback Capital Management, and Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors, were convicted of trading on insider information about Dell Computer and Nvidia. They appealed their convictions based on the federal district court judge’s refusal to instruct the jury that they could not be convicted unless they knew the employees leaking the information had received a benefit when they violated their duty to their companies by providing the information.
The Second Circuit sided with the defendants and vacated the convictions. “[We] conclude that, in order to sustain a conviction for insider trading, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the tippee knew that an insider disclosed confidential information and that he did so in exchange for a personal benefit,” the court ruled.
In reaching its decision in United States v. Newman, the appeals court cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent holding that trading on inside information is legal unless it is obtained from an individual who violates a duty to keep it confidential and receives something of value in return for the information. As explained by the Second Circuit:
“First, the tippee’s liability derives only from the tipper’s breach of a fiduciary duty, not from trading on material nonpublic information. Second, the corporate insider has committed no breach of fiduciary duty unless he receives a personal benefit in exchange for the disclosure. Third, even in the presence of a tipper’s breach, a tippee is liable only if he knows or should have known of the breach.”
“We find no support for the government’ s contention that knowledge of a breach of the duty of confidentiality without knowledge of the personal benefit is sufficient to impose criminal liability. Although the government might like the law to be different, nothing in the law requires a symmetry of information in the nation’s securities markets,” the court added.
The Second Circuit’s decision raises the bar for prosecutors and will have widespread implications on the government’s ability to impose insider-trading liability. In addition, at least one convicted insider trader stands to benefit from the new legal standard. Michael Steinberg, of SAC Capital Advisors, is appealing his conviction, which was based on the same jury instruction.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Second Circuit Decision Threatens Insider Trading Prosecutions
Author: Dan Brecher
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s insider trading victories came to a screeching halt earlier this month.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business News Blog, Todd Newman, a portfolio manager at Diamondback Capital Management, and Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors, were convicted of trading on insider information about Dell Computer and Nvidia. They appealed their convictions based on the federal district court judge’s refusal to instruct the jury that they could not be convicted unless they knew the employees leaking the information had received a benefit when they violated their duty to their companies by providing the information.
The Second Circuit sided with the defendants and vacated the convictions. “[We] conclude that, in order to sustain a conviction for insider trading, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the tippee knew that an insider disclosed confidential information and that he did so in exchange for a personal benefit,” the court ruled.
In reaching its decision in United States v. Newman, the appeals court cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent holding that trading on inside information is legal unless it is obtained from an individual who violates a duty to keep it confidential and receives something of value in return for the information. As explained by the Second Circuit:
“First, the tippee’s liability derives only from the tipper’s breach of a fiduciary duty, not from trading on material nonpublic information. Second, the corporate insider has committed no breach of fiduciary duty unless he receives a personal benefit in exchange for the disclosure. Third, even in the presence of a tipper’s breach, a tippee is liable only if he knows or should have known of the breach.”
“We find no support for the government’ s contention that knowledge of a breach of the duty of confidentiality without knowledge of the personal benefit is sufficient to impose criminal liability. Although the government might like the law to be different, nothing in the law requires a symmetry of information in the nation’s securities markets,” the court added.
The Second Circuit’s decision raises the bar for prosecutors and will have widespread implications on the government’s ability to impose insider-trading liability. In addition, at least one convicted insider trader stands to benefit from the new legal standard. Michael Steinberg, of SAC Capital Advisors, is appealing his conviction, which was based on the same jury instruction.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
