
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: July 18, 2023
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comBusiness communications have become increasingly informal in recent years. While we are not here to debate whether using emojis is appropriate when conducting business dealings, we will warn you that emojis can have unintended legal consequences.
A Canadian farmer recently learned this lesson the hard way in a lawsuit that is making headlines across the globe. According to the court, by responding with a thumbs-up emoji to a text message that contained a picture of a proposed contract, the farmer affirmed his consent to be bound by the terms of the contract.
When communicating electronically via text or email, the basic principles of contract law still apply. In order for a business agreement to be enforceable, there must be a valid offer and acceptance, supported by consideration.
Accordingly, if one party responds to a contract sent via text message or email by proposing different terms, the offer is considered rejected. The contract formation process must then start anew. The parties must intend to be contractually bound. While intent need not be expressly conveyed in the electronic communication, it must be clear that the parties intended the agreement to be legally binding.
In analyzing the parties’ intentions, courts in both the United States and Canada generally apply the objective theory of contract formation, under which courts evaluate “how each party’s conduct would appear to a reasonable person in the position of the other party.” In other words, the key issue is not what the parties subjectively had in mind, but rather whether their conduct was such that a reasonable person would conclude that they had intended to be legally bound by the terms stated in the proposed contract.
A recent Canadian case centered on whether, by responding with a thumbs-up emoji, farmer Chris Achter agreed to sell 87 metric tons of flax to a long-time business associate.
As detailed in court documents, South West Terminal Ltd. had purchased grain from Achter’s company, Achter Land & Cattle Ltd., through various deferred grain contracts since 2012.
On March 26, 2021, Kent Mickleborough, a Farm Marketing Representative with SWT, texted the following text message to producers, including Bob Achter and Chris Achter: “All Divisions – – Kent Mickleborough – Flax Prices: Flax 1Can(max 6% dockage) $22.50/bu Apr. $17.00 Oct/Nov/Dec del.”
After he sent the text message, Mickleborough spoke with both Bob and Chris Achter. Following these conversations, he had a contract drafted for Achter to sell SWT 86 metric tons of flax to SWT at a price of $17.00 per bushel with a delivery period listed as “Nov.” Mickleborough applied his ink signature to the contract, then took a photo of the contract using his cell phone. He then texted the photo of the contract to Chris Achter, along with the text message: “Please confirm flax contract.” Chris Achter texted back with a “thumbs-up” emoji. After Achter failed to deliver the flax in accordance with the contract, SWT filed suit.
According to Achter, he intended the emoji to simply convey that he had received the contract. However, the court concluded that the parties’ prior business dealings suggested otherwise. “This court readily acknowledges that a “thumbs up” emoji is a non-traditional means to ‘sign’ a document, but nevertheless, under these circumstances, this was a valid way to convey the two purposes of a “signature” – to identify the signator (Chris using his unique cell phone number) and as I have found above – to convey Achter’s acceptance of the flax contract,” Justice T. J. Keene wrote.
In support of his decision, Justice Keene cited the dictionary.com definition of the thumbs-up emoji. It states that the emoji is “used to express assent, approval or encouragement in digital communications, especially in Western cultures.”
Justice Keene also noted that the texting of a contract and then the seeking and receipt of approval was consistent with the previous process between SWT and Achter to enter into grain contracts. On several prior occasions, Mickleborough had texted Achter grain contracts, and Achter had responded by texting “looks good,” “ok” or “yup.” In such cases, Achter delivered the flax in accordance with the terms of the contract, confirming that both parties understood that these short responses were “not a mere acknowledgment of the receipt of the contract.”
To avoid a costly breach of contract lawsuit, below are five tips for negotiating a contract via text message, email, or other form of electronic communication:
Not every use of a thumbs-up emoji will have legal consequences. However, this recent court decision highlights that if a reasonable person would interpret a text or email exchange involving emojis to represent a binding offer and acceptance, it may be sufficient to trigger a finding that an enforceable contract has been made.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Business communications have become increasingly informal in recent years. While we are not here to debate whether using emojis is appropriate when conducting business dealings, we will warn you that emojis can have unintended legal consequences.
A Canadian farmer recently learned this lesson the hard way in a lawsuit that is making headlines across the globe. According to the court, by responding with a thumbs-up emoji to a text message that contained a picture of a proposed contract, the farmer affirmed his consent to be bound by the terms of the contract.
When communicating electronically via text or email, the basic principles of contract law still apply. In order for a business agreement to be enforceable, there must be a valid offer and acceptance, supported by consideration.
Accordingly, if one party responds to a contract sent via text message or email by proposing different terms, the offer is considered rejected. The contract formation process must then start anew. The parties must intend to be contractually bound. While intent need not be expressly conveyed in the electronic communication, it must be clear that the parties intended the agreement to be legally binding.
In analyzing the parties’ intentions, courts in both the United States and Canada generally apply the objective theory of contract formation, under which courts evaluate “how each party’s conduct would appear to a reasonable person in the position of the other party.” In other words, the key issue is not what the parties subjectively had in mind, but rather whether their conduct was such that a reasonable person would conclude that they had intended to be legally bound by the terms stated in the proposed contract.
A recent Canadian case centered on whether, by responding with a thumbs-up emoji, farmer Chris Achter agreed to sell 87 metric tons of flax to a long-time business associate.
As detailed in court documents, South West Terminal Ltd. had purchased grain from Achter’s company, Achter Land & Cattle Ltd., through various deferred grain contracts since 2012.
On March 26, 2021, Kent Mickleborough, a Farm Marketing Representative with SWT, texted the following text message to producers, including Bob Achter and Chris Achter: “All Divisions – – Kent Mickleborough – Flax Prices: Flax 1Can(max 6% dockage) $22.50/bu Apr. $17.00 Oct/Nov/Dec del.”
After he sent the text message, Mickleborough spoke with both Bob and Chris Achter. Following these conversations, he had a contract drafted for Achter to sell SWT 86 metric tons of flax to SWT at a price of $17.00 per bushel with a delivery period listed as “Nov.” Mickleborough applied his ink signature to the contract, then took a photo of the contract using his cell phone. He then texted the photo of the contract to Chris Achter, along with the text message: “Please confirm flax contract.” Chris Achter texted back with a “thumbs-up” emoji. After Achter failed to deliver the flax in accordance with the contract, SWT filed suit.
According to Achter, he intended the emoji to simply convey that he had received the contract. However, the court concluded that the parties’ prior business dealings suggested otherwise. “This court readily acknowledges that a “thumbs up” emoji is a non-traditional means to ‘sign’ a document, but nevertheless, under these circumstances, this was a valid way to convey the two purposes of a “signature” – to identify the signator (Chris using his unique cell phone number) and as I have found above – to convey Achter’s acceptance of the flax contract,” Justice T. J. Keene wrote.
In support of his decision, Justice Keene cited the dictionary.com definition of the thumbs-up emoji. It states that the emoji is “used to express assent, approval or encouragement in digital communications, especially in Western cultures.”
Justice Keene also noted that the texting of a contract and then the seeking and receipt of approval was consistent with the previous process between SWT and Achter to enter into grain contracts. On several prior occasions, Mickleborough had texted Achter grain contracts, and Achter had responded by texting “looks good,” “ok” or “yup.” In such cases, Achter delivered the flax in accordance with the terms of the contract, confirming that both parties understood that these short responses were “not a mere acknowledgment of the receipt of the contract.”
To avoid a costly breach of contract lawsuit, below are five tips for negotiating a contract via text message, email, or other form of electronic communication:
Not every use of a thumbs-up emoji will have legal consequences. However, this recent court decision highlights that if a reasonable person would interpret a text or email exchange involving emojis to represent a binding offer and acceptance, it may be sufficient to trigger a finding that an enforceable contract has been made.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!