
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 25, 2015
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comBanks investigate reported fraud, such as this, usually after receiving a panicked phone call from the card owner who comes to realize that her bank account has been pirated because the next time she used the card the transaction was denied for insufficient funds in the account. Aside from reporting the fraud and hoping the bank will agree with her that it is a fraud, and reimburse her, what should the debit card owner do to protect against the problem or to resolve it satisfactorily when it occurs?
A source of the theft is often that the card owner used a bank debit card at a gas station or store where the card owner did not know the workers, or did not see the person or camera noting the personal identification information she entered at the transaction payment point. Instead of using a debit card in such situations, the use of a credit card is a better option. But, if the fraud occurs, there are ways to communicate with the bank card issuer’s fraud investigation department that will improve your chances of getting the bank’s agreement that it was fraud and being reimbursed for the theft.
After your initial call, in which you tell the investigation unit what happened, the bank provides you with an identifying number for your claim, investigates, and within days reports back to you its determination. Often, the bank’s initial investigation will be brief and will result in a denial, putting the burden on you to appeal that determination. The bank has an appeal process for that. If you make a phone request, you will be provided with a post office address of the bank’s appeals unit and instructed to send your appeal, in writing, with such evidence as you may have to support your contention that the ATM withdrawals by the thief were not authorized by you, and that your card was never out of your possession. You can gather support for your appeal to overturn the initial determination denying your claim of fraud by presenting arguments that would lead to the conclusion that the card information was pilfered, and that the card use withdrawing cash from ATM’s was not by you and was not authorized by you. It is important to verify and state that your card was never out of your possession.
Of course, it is a good idea to try to determine where the theft occurred and whether the ATM machines used for the unauthorized withdrawals had cameras in place that recorded the transactions. If the thief was dumb enough to use a cash machine that photographed users, that would be best evidence that it was not you, nor was it an authorized user, that withdrew the funds. Other evidence you could assemble to prove your point is more readily available to you: your own history with the bank. For example, if you, like many of us, have been banking with the same bank for a number of years, and you have never used a non-bank ATM, include that information in your appeal. Also, if you never made multiple withdrawals in a single day, that would be additional circumstantial evidence to support your claim. Were you in another state, or at a significant distance away from where the unauthorized withdrawals were made at the time they were made by the thief? You may have credit card receipts, work reports, a witness statement from a person with you at the time, or other proofs that you could not have been the person who made the unauthorized withdrawals.
Consider contacting someone within the bank with whom you have had personal dealings and who may have a more sympathetic ear than a distant investigator who sees you as just another case number to resolve, and with instructions to deny appeals that are close calls. Your business relationship has value to the bank, particularly if you have kept deposits, or a business account with the bank, or if you have introduced other clients to the bank; a relationship that might be imperiled or broken by treatment of your claim that you deem unreasonable or unsatisfactory. It is certainly worth mentioning in your appeal the length of the relationship you have had with the bank, the type of accounts you maintain with the bank, the size of the deposits, fees paid or other information that may show the investigator that the claim is a serious one and that the consequences of a denial of the claim may outweigh the size of the claim being denied. You should provide the claim investigator with the name of a person at the bank that knows you and can verify the value of your relationship with the bank.
And, in the event of a denial of your appeal, seek to speak to a still higher authority, as well as your local branch manager who will not want the relationship jeopardized. If all else fails, a polite but pointed letter to the office of the president of the bank may also bring a more reasoned re-look at your claim.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Banks investigate reported fraud, such as this, usually after receiving a panicked phone call from the card owner who comes to realize that her bank account has been pirated because the next time she used the card the transaction was denied for insufficient funds in the account. Aside from reporting the fraud and hoping the bank will agree with her that it is a fraud, and reimburse her, what should the debit card owner do to protect against the problem or to resolve it satisfactorily when it occurs?
A source of the theft is often that the card owner used a bank debit card at a gas station or store where the card owner did not know the workers, or did not see the person or camera noting the personal identification information she entered at the transaction payment point. Instead of using a debit card in such situations, the use of a credit card is a better option. But, if the fraud occurs, there are ways to communicate with the bank card issuer’s fraud investigation department that will improve your chances of getting the bank’s agreement that it was fraud and being reimbursed for the theft.
After your initial call, in which you tell the investigation unit what happened, the bank provides you with an identifying number for your claim, investigates, and within days reports back to you its determination. Often, the bank’s initial investigation will be brief and will result in a denial, putting the burden on you to appeal that determination. The bank has an appeal process for that. If you make a phone request, you will be provided with a post office address of the bank’s appeals unit and instructed to send your appeal, in writing, with such evidence as you may have to support your contention that the ATM withdrawals by the thief were not authorized by you, and that your card was never out of your possession. You can gather support for your appeal to overturn the initial determination denying your claim of fraud by presenting arguments that would lead to the conclusion that the card information was pilfered, and that the card use withdrawing cash from ATM’s was not by you and was not authorized by you. It is important to verify and state that your card was never out of your possession.
Of course, it is a good idea to try to determine where the theft occurred and whether the ATM machines used for the unauthorized withdrawals had cameras in place that recorded the transactions. If the thief was dumb enough to use a cash machine that photographed users, that would be best evidence that it was not you, nor was it an authorized user, that withdrew the funds. Other evidence you could assemble to prove your point is more readily available to you: your own history with the bank. For example, if you, like many of us, have been banking with the same bank for a number of years, and you have never used a non-bank ATM, include that information in your appeal. Also, if you never made multiple withdrawals in a single day, that would be additional circumstantial evidence to support your claim. Were you in another state, or at a significant distance away from where the unauthorized withdrawals were made at the time they were made by the thief? You may have credit card receipts, work reports, a witness statement from a person with you at the time, or other proofs that you could not have been the person who made the unauthorized withdrawals.
Consider contacting someone within the bank with whom you have had personal dealings and who may have a more sympathetic ear than a distant investigator who sees you as just another case number to resolve, and with instructions to deny appeals that are close calls. Your business relationship has value to the bank, particularly if you have kept deposits, or a business account with the bank, or if you have introduced other clients to the bank; a relationship that might be imperiled or broken by treatment of your claim that you deem unreasonable or unsatisfactory. It is certainly worth mentioning in your appeal the length of the relationship you have had with the bank, the type of accounts you maintain with the bank, the size of the deposits, fees paid or other information that may show the investigator that the claim is a serious one and that the consequences of a denial of the claim may outweigh the size of the claim being denied. You should provide the claim investigator with the name of a person at the bank that knows you and can verify the value of your relationship with the bank.
And, in the event of a denial of your appeal, seek to speak to a still higher authority, as well as your local branch manager who will not want the relationship jeopardized. If all else fails, a polite but pointed letter to the office of the president of the bank may also bring a more reasoned re-look at your claim.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!