Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
Mandatory arbitration clauses in brokerage contracts could soon be a thing of the past. Lawmakers are calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to ban what they call the “abuse of forced arbitration contracts.”
As Senator Al Franken (D-Minn) and his colleagues noted in their letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White, “The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, among other reasons, to protect American consumers from abusive financial services practices. Section 921 reflects Congress’s concern over the increasingly widespread use of mandatory arbitration agreements in customer and client contracts, and grants the Commission authority to restrict or prohibit the use of these provisions.” The SEC, however, has yet to take such action.
Mandatory arbitration clauses have been a hot topic since the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) challenged the class action waiver included in Charles Schwab’s customer agreements. FINRA’s Enforcement Department had charged Schwab with violating FINRA rules concerning language or conditions that firms may place in customer agreements when Schwab amended its customer account agreement to include a provision requiring customers to waive their rights to bring or participate in class actions against the firm.
However, a FINRA hearing panel recently held that FINRA could not enforce its class action rules prohibiting waivers in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. As noted in the decision, “The amended language used in Schwab’s customer agreements to prohibit participation in judicial class actions does violate FINRA rules, but that FINRA may not enforce those rules because they are in conflict with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).”
The lawmakers cite the Schwab decision as further evidence that swift action by the SEC is needed to protect investors. “If arbitration offers investors an efficient forum to resolve disputes, as some argue, investors may choose that option—but they should be given the choice. It is equally important that investors not be precluded from bringing class actions because of contractual fine print imposed by a mandatory waiver class action clause.”
While the SEC has not yet indicated what action it will take, if any, several SEC commissioners have spoken out on the issue. “A client’s right to bring private actions under the Exchange Act is meaningful, and the client should not be required to waive — prematurely — their legal rights, including their rights to bring an action in federal or state court,” Luis A. Aguilar stated.
If you have any questions the use of mandatory arbitration provisions in brokerage contracts or other agreements, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Are Brokerage Contracts Headed For a Huge Change?
Author: Dan Brecher
Mandatory arbitration clauses in brokerage contracts could soon be a thing of the past. Lawmakers are calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to ban what they call the “abuse of forced arbitration contracts.”
As Senator Al Franken (D-Minn) and his colleagues noted in their letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White, “The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, among other reasons, to protect American consumers from abusive financial services practices. Section 921 reflects Congress’s concern over the increasingly widespread use of mandatory arbitration agreements in customer and client contracts, and grants the Commission authority to restrict or prohibit the use of these provisions.” The SEC, however, has yet to take such action.
Mandatory arbitration clauses have been a hot topic since the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) challenged the class action waiver included in Charles Schwab’s customer agreements. FINRA’s Enforcement Department had charged Schwab with violating FINRA rules concerning language or conditions that firms may place in customer agreements when Schwab amended its customer account agreement to include a provision requiring customers to waive their rights to bring or participate in class actions against the firm.
However, a FINRA hearing panel recently held that FINRA could not enforce its class action rules prohibiting waivers in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. As noted in the decision, “The amended language used in Schwab’s customer agreements to prohibit participation in judicial class actions does violate FINRA rules, but that FINRA may not enforce those rules because they are in conflict with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).”
The lawmakers cite the Schwab decision as further evidence that swift action by the SEC is needed to protect investors. “If arbitration offers investors an efficient forum to resolve disputes, as some argue, investors may choose that option—but they should be given the choice. It is equally important that investors not be precluded from bringing class actions because of contractual fine print imposed by a mandatory waiver class action clause.”
While the SEC has not yet indicated what action it will take, if any, several SEC commissioners have spoken out on the issue. “A client’s right to bring private actions under the Exchange Act is meaningful, and the client should not be required to waive — prematurely — their legal rights, including their rights to bring an action in federal or state court,” Luis A. Aguilar stated.
If you have any questions the use of mandatory arbitration provisions in brokerage contracts or other agreements, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.