Is this the end of agreement to agree in New York?
A recent New York court decision highlights that letters of intent can often lead to messy breach of contract lawsuits – especially when it comes to the concept of agreement to agree.
As the appeals court highlighted in New York Military Academy v. NewOpen Group, businesses can’t enforce the terms of a letter of intent unless both parties intended it to be a binding contract.
The Letter of Intent
The New York Military Academy and NewOpen Group executed a letter of intent regarding a potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent provided that parties “shall negotiate to arrive at mutually acceptable Definitive Agreements” regarding the potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent further provided that the parties “each reserve the right to withdraw from further negotiations at any time if, in the sole judgment of either or both, it is in either Party’s best interest to do so, without further liability or obligation to the other.”
…it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties…
After negotiations broke down, the New York Military Academy filed suit, asserting causes of action alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, and fraud. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. After the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, NewOpen Group appealed.
The Court’s Decision
The New York appeals court reversed the lower court’s decision and dismissed the New York breach of contract litigation. “The Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint, as documentary evidence, in the form of the letter of intent, utterly refuted the plaintiff’s factual allegations, thereby conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law,” the court held.
In support of its decision, the court cited prior precedent holding that it is well-settled under New York common law of contracts that a mere agreement to agree, in which a material term is left for future negotiations, is unenforceable. “Here, the letter of intent demonstrated that the plaintiff’s allegations of breach of contract related to a mere agreement to agree,” the appeals court explained.
The Bottom Line for New York Businesses
To avoid a costly legal dispute, New York businesses should ensure that all letters of intent are properly drafted to expressly indicate if certain provisions are enforceable agreements in and of themselves (such as confidentiality provisions), even if a final transaction is still under negotiation. Since it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties, the assistance of an experienced business lawyer is often advisable.
Otherwise, if you’re a business owner unsure of how to properly put together a letter of intent or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Agreement to Agree is Not Enforceable in NY
Author: Dan Brecher
Is this the end of agreement to agree in New York?
A recent New York court decision highlights that letters of intent can often lead to messy breach of contract lawsuits – especially when it comes to the concept of agreement to agree.
As the appeals court highlighted in New York Military Academy v. NewOpen Group, businesses can’t enforce the terms of a letter of intent unless both parties intended it to be a binding contract.
The Letter of Intent
The New York Military Academy and NewOpen Group executed a letter of intent regarding a potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent provided that parties “shall negotiate to arrive at mutually acceptable Definitive Agreements” regarding the potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent further provided that the parties “each reserve the right to withdraw from further negotiations at any time if, in the sole judgment of either or both, it is in either Party’s best interest to do so, without further liability or obligation to the other.”
…it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties…
After negotiations broke down, the New York Military Academy filed suit, asserting causes of action alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, and fraud. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. After the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, NewOpen Group appealed.
The Court’s Decision
The New York appeals court reversed the lower court’s decision and dismissed the New York breach of contract litigation. “The Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint, as documentary evidence, in the form of the letter of intent, utterly refuted the plaintiff’s factual allegations, thereby conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law,” the court held.
In support of its decision, the court cited prior precedent holding that it is well-settled under New York common law of contracts that a mere agreement to agree, in which a material term is left for future negotiations, is unenforceable. “Here, the letter of intent demonstrated that the plaintiff’s allegations of breach of contract related to a mere agreement to agree,” the appeals court explained.
The Bottom Line for New York Businesses
To avoid a costly legal dispute, New York businesses should ensure that all letters of intent are properly drafted to expressly indicate if certain provisions are enforceable agreements in and of themselves (such as confidentiality provisions), even if a final transaction is still under negotiation. Since it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties, the assistance of an experienced business lawyer is often advisable.
Otherwise, if you’re a business owner unsure of how to properly put together a letter of intent or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
