Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comCOVID-19 Education Alerts
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 15, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Department of Education has released guidance which sets forth the following minimum requirements:
Source: The Road Back, NJ DOE, pg. 25
Screening Method | Do we recommend this? | Rationale |
Temperature Checks | No. | NJ DOE Guidance permits, but does not require Confidentiality and privacy concerns Logistical concerns |
Mandatory Testing | No. |
We are currently advising against implementing temperature checks as a screening method due to practical and legal concerns. If your district elects to proceed with temperature screening, a variety of legal issues may arise including, but not limited to, the confidentiality of employee health data and adherence to social distancing protocols.
Please comply with the CDC COVID-19 Workplace Guidelines which lay out procedures for both:
While we recommend against adopting a policy requiring employee temperature checks due to the concerns noted above, such measures are a valid and acceptable method for employee screening. Should Districts elect to adopt such a policy, it is imperative that employee confidentiality be maintained. Employees’ temperatures should not be announced or seen by anyone other than the individual(s) authorized to conduct the screening. Employees’ temperatures are medical records and should be kept separately from personnel files.
Any District employee selected to conduct temperature screenings of other employees should be provided with training regarding the proper handling and maintenance of confidential medical information.
If the District elects to utilize a third-party vendor to perform temperature screenings, including mobile applications which allow employees to self-screen, please be aware that issues may arise due to the vendor’s policies with respect to maintaining and sharing employee data. It is recommended that a thorough review of all vendor agreements and applicable policies be conducted before a vendor is selected.
If a District elects not to implement temperature screenings, employees may instead be required to answer questions regarding their current health status and provide updated responses as needed. Screening forms should require the employee to respond to the following:
Employees should be advised that they are required to report a change in the response to any of the questions noted above which may then result in a requirement that they quarantine for a period of 14 days and/or submit to COVID-19 testing.
May districts require that staff get tested for COVID-19?
Yes. Per the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines, Districts may require that staff get tested so long as requiring the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 poses a direct threat to the health of others in the workplace, therefore, requiring a test is job-related and consistent with business necessity.
While it is not recommended that employees generally be required to submit to testing prior to returning to work, it is recommended that employees submit to such testing in the following circumstances:
Please be advised that employers may not require employees to take antibody tests before returning to work under any circumstances.
May Districts require employees to wear masks for the entire workday?
Yes. “Schools and districts must allow for social distancing to the maximum extent possible. When social distancing is difficult or impossible, face coverings are required, and face coverings are always required for visitors and staff unless it will inhibit the individual’s health. School districts must also minimize use of shared objects, ensure indoor facilities have adequate ventilation, prepare and maintain hand sanitizing stations, and ensure students wash hands frequently.” The Road Back: Restart and Recovery Plan for Education, NJ Department of Education, June 2020.
One of the very few explicit requirements included by the Department of Education in the reopening guidance is the requirement that all staff wear face coverings, unless prevented from doing so as a result of a health condition. If an employee claims a medical exemption to the face-covering requirement, the employee should be required to submit a medical certification attesting to the specific medical condition and diagnosis that makes compliance a health risk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Sarah Gober, Caitlin Dettmer, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
On January 11, 2022, Governor Phil Murphy reinstated New Jersey’s Public Health Emergency, which became effective immediately… On January 11, 2022, Governor Phil Murphy reinstated New Jersey’s Public Health Emergency, which became effective immediately, in response to the continued threat of COVID-19 and the rapidly spreading Omicron variant. The new Public Health Emergency allows for existing […]
Author: John G. Geppert
Governor Murphy issued Executive Order 253, which requires all covered workers of school districts to either provide adequate proof that they have been fully vaccinated or submit to COVID-19 testing at least one to two times weekly… On August 23, 2021, Governor Murphy issued Executive Order 253, which requires all covered workers of school districts […]
Author: Nathanya G. Simon
Navigating COVID-19 continues to be a challenge for New Jersey school districts… Navigating COVID-19 continues to be a challenge for New Jersey school districts. When implementing policies for the 2021-2022 school year, it is important to recognize that guidance continues to evolve, and policies may need to be adjusted accordingly. In recent weeks, the […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
As New Jersey schools plan for the 2020-2021 school year, health and safety is clearly a top priority… As New Jersey schools plan for the 2020-2021 school year, health and safety is clearly a top priority. At the same time, districts must also be mindful of their potential liability in connection with COVID-19. The New […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
New Jersey schools can open remotely under a new Executive Order issued by Gov. Phil Murphy. New Jersey schools can open remotely under a new Executive Order issued by Gov. Phil Murphy. Under Executive Order 175, school districts may start the year with in-person instruction provided that they certify that they can satisfy the state’s […]
Author: Nathanya G. Simon
Gov. Phil Murphy recently signed Executive Order No. 172 (EO 172), which amends his previous Executive Order No 115 (EO 115) Gov. Phil Murphy recently signed Executive Order No. 172 (EO 172), which amends his previous Executive Order No 115 (EO 115) that had extended health benefits to certain new hires hired specifically in response […]
Author: Jorge R. de Armas
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The New Jersey Department of Education has released guidance which sets forth the following minimum requirements:
Source: The Road Back, NJ DOE, pg. 25
Screening Method | Do we recommend this? | Rationale |
Temperature Checks | No. | NJ DOE Guidance permits, but does not require Confidentiality and privacy concerns Logistical concerns |
Mandatory Testing | No. |
We are currently advising against implementing temperature checks as a screening method due to practical and legal concerns. If your district elects to proceed with temperature screening, a variety of legal issues may arise including, but not limited to, the confidentiality of employee health data and adherence to social distancing protocols.
Please comply with the CDC COVID-19 Workplace Guidelines which lay out procedures for both:
While we recommend against adopting a policy requiring employee temperature checks due to the concerns noted above, such measures are a valid and acceptable method for employee screening. Should Districts elect to adopt such a policy, it is imperative that employee confidentiality be maintained. Employees’ temperatures should not be announced or seen by anyone other than the individual(s) authorized to conduct the screening. Employees’ temperatures are medical records and should be kept separately from personnel files.
Any District employee selected to conduct temperature screenings of other employees should be provided with training regarding the proper handling and maintenance of confidential medical information.
If the District elects to utilize a third-party vendor to perform temperature screenings, including mobile applications which allow employees to self-screen, please be aware that issues may arise due to the vendor’s policies with respect to maintaining and sharing employee data. It is recommended that a thorough review of all vendor agreements and applicable policies be conducted before a vendor is selected.
If a District elects not to implement temperature screenings, employees may instead be required to answer questions regarding their current health status and provide updated responses as needed. Screening forms should require the employee to respond to the following:
Employees should be advised that they are required to report a change in the response to any of the questions noted above which may then result in a requirement that they quarantine for a period of 14 days and/or submit to COVID-19 testing.
May districts require that staff get tested for COVID-19?
Yes. Per the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines, Districts may require that staff get tested so long as requiring the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Given the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 poses a direct threat to the health of others in the workplace, therefore, requiring a test is job-related and consistent with business necessity.
While it is not recommended that employees generally be required to submit to testing prior to returning to work, it is recommended that employees submit to such testing in the following circumstances:
Please be advised that employers may not require employees to take antibody tests before returning to work under any circumstances.
May Districts require employees to wear masks for the entire workday?
Yes. “Schools and districts must allow for social distancing to the maximum extent possible. When social distancing is difficult or impossible, face coverings are required, and face coverings are always required for visitors and staff unless it will inhibit the individual’s health. School districts must also minimize use of shared objects, ensure indoor facilities have adequate ventilation, prepare and maintain hand sanitizing stations, and ensure students wash hands frequently.” The Road Back: Restart and Recovery Plan for Education, NJ Department of Education, June 2020.
One of the very few explicit requirements included by the Department of Education in the reopening guidance is the requirement that all staff wear face coverings, unless prevented from doing so as a result of a health condition. If an employee claims a medical exemption to the face-covering requirement, the employee should be required to submit a medical certification attesting to the specific medical condition and diagnosis that makes compliance a health risk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Sarah Gober, Caitlin Dettmer, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!