
John M. Scagnelli
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: John M. Scagnelli
Date: August 31, 2022
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently announced seven new environmental enforcement actions. The suits, which are part of the Murphy Administration’s ongoing environmental justice initiative, have the potential to result in significant liability for the entities involved.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group, which is one of New Jersey’s most experienced and respected, is well-positioned to help defend environmental justice lawsuits and help impacted entities reach a successful resolution. Our environmental attorneys are skilled in both environmental litigation and remediation strategies and have a proven track record of working together to help our clients minimize or avoid costly liability for contamination.
Over the past several years, the Murphy Administration has taken numerous steps to elevate the importance of environmental justice. As we have discussed in prior articles, its actions to address pollution and environmental hazards in minority and lower-income communities include launching an environmental justice initiative, creating an Environmental Justice Advisory Council, spearheading the enactment of New Jersey’s Environmental Justice Law, and bringing enforcement actions targeting polluters in minority and lower-income communities.
According to the NJDEP, its most recent enforcement actions are intended to “send a message to polluters,” particularly those with property located in overburdened communities. “In New Jersey, we are confronting the historic injustices that have burdened low-income and minority communities with a disproportionate amount of pollution,” DEP Commissioner Shawn LaTourette said in a press statement. “Our commitment to furthering the promise of environmental justice sometimes demands that we take legal action to correct the legacy of pollution that underserved communities have endured.”
The suits allege violations of New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act, Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act, Industrial Site Recovery Act, Water Pollution Control Act, Solid Waste Management Act, and Industrial Site Remediation Reform Act and involve several different types of alleged contamination, such as former filling station operations that discharged gasoline, diesel fuel, and waste oil into the ground and dumping tainted fill at a former coal ash disposal site. The remedies sought in the suits include clean-up of the contaminated properties, payment of civil penalties, compliance with administrative orders previously issued by the NJDEP, and reimbursement to the State for the cost of site investigation, remediation, monitoring, and other related work.
The recent enforcement actions confirm that addressing contamination in minority and lower-income communities remains a top priority for the Murphy Administration. According to the NJDEP, including the lawsuits filed today, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office and NJDEP have filed a total of 52 environmental justice cases since 2018. To date, the lawsuits have yielded nearly $20 million in judgments.
For entities currently facing enforcement actions, it is imperative to take swift legal action. If you have not done so already, the first step is to contact an experienced environmental law attorney.
All other property owners and others that may be responsible for pollution and other environmental hazards in such communities should also be prepared for increased scrutiny. Given that the costs of remediation and related enforcement penalties, businesses should also be proactive in seeking legal counsel.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
FinCEN Beneficial Owner Reporting Must be Completed by January 13 for pre-2024 Companies On December 23, 2024, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction that stayed the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act put into place by a federal judge in Texas. The result is that if you are required to file a […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
IMPORTANT UPDATE! FinCEN Corporate Transparency Act filings shut down by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), entities that were in existence before January 1, 2024 are required to file Beneficial Owner Reports (BOR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) before January 1, 2025. Requirements […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
On September 12, 2024, Gov. Phil Murphy signed controversial legislation that will dramatically alter New Jersey’s cannabis, hemp, and liquor industries. The new law aims to regulate the influx of intoxicating hemp products into the marketplace by bringing them under the purview of the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC). That means that edibles, THC-infused beverages, […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
On May 16, 2024, President Joe Biden announced that his administration is committed to reclassifying cannabis. Shortly thereafter, Attorney General Merritt Garland initiated the formal rulemaking process to move cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). “This is monumental,” President Biden said in a video statement […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to take significant action regarding the regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS. On April 19, 2024, the EPA released its Final Rule designating PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which will allow EPA to use the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Parties involved in a civil enforcement matter by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could soon find themselves facing even more serious criminal liability. On April 17, 2024, the EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance announced a new “Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy” (Policy). The Policy is effective immediately and applies to all civil and […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently announced seven new environmental enforcement actions. The suits, which are part of the Murphy Administration’s ongoing environmental justice initiative, have the potential to result in significant liability for the entities involved.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group, which is one of New Jersey’s most experienced and respected, is well-positioned to help defend environmental justice lawsuits and help impacted entities reach a successful resolution. Our environmental attorneys are skilled in both environmental litigation and remediation strategies and have a proven track record of working together to help our clients minimize or avoid costly liability for contamination.
Over the past several years, the Murphy Administration has taken numerous steps to elevate the importance of environmental justice. As we have discussed in prior articles, its actions to address pollution and environmental hazards in minority and lower-income communities include launching an environmental justice initiative, creating an Environmental Justice Advisory Council, spearheading the enactment of New Jersey’s Environmental Justice Law, and bringing enforcement actions targeting polluters in minority and lower-income communities.
According to the NJDEP, its most recent enforcement actions are intended to “send a message to polluters,” particularly those with property located in overburdened communities. “In New Jersey, we are confronting the historic injustices that have burdened low-income and minority communities with a disproportionate amount of pollution,” DEP Commissioner Shawn LaTourette said in a press statement. “Our commitment to furthering the promise of environmental justice sometimes demands that we take legal action to correct the legacy of pollution that underserved communities have endured.”
The suits allege violations of New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act, Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act, Industrial Site Recovery Act, Water Pollution Control Act, Solid Waste Management Act, and Industrial Site Remediation Reform Act and involve several different types of alleged contamination, such as former filling station operations that discharged gasoline, diesel fuel, and waste oil into the ground and dumping tainted fill at a former coal ash disposal site. The remedies sought in the suits include clean-up of the contaminated properties, payment of civil penalties, compliance with administrative orders previously issued by the NJDEP, and reimbursement to the State for the cost of site investigation, remediation, monitoring, and other related work.
The recent enforcement actions confirm that addressing contamination in minority and lower-income communities remains a top priority for the Murphy Administration. According to the NJDEP, including the lawsuits filed today, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office and NJDEP have filed a total of 52 environmental justice cases since 2018. To date, the lawsuits have yielded nearly $20 million in judgments.
For entities currently facing enforcement actions, it is imperative to take swift legal action. If you have not done so already, the first step is to contact an experienced environmental law attorney.
All other property owners and others that may be responsible for pollution and other environmental hazards in such communities should also be prepared for increased scrutiny. Given that the costs of remediation and related enforcement penalties, businesses should also be proactive in seeking legal counsel.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!