Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
RadioShack submits to mediation involving customer data
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 21, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
RadioShack submits to mediation involving customer data
RadioShack recently agreed to mediation with state attorneys general who have expressed privacy concerns about the sale of the Fort Worth, Texas-based electronics retailer’s customer data. The company consented to this process after the attorneys general of several states raised questions about whether RadioShack in fact has the right to sell this information without breaching its own privacy policies.
Mediation Scheduled For May 14
Amid these concerns, Greg Gordon, attorney for RadioShack, told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon April 28 that the company has agreed to mediation, which was scheduled to begin May 14, according to The Associated Press.
This date falls after an auction of intellectual property assets – which includes the names and addresses of millions of RadioShack’s customers – scheduled for May 11, The Associated Press reported.
However, the attorneys general of Texas, Pennsylvania, Oregon and Tennessee have formally protested this sale, asserting that the details the electronics retailer is providing are not only inadequate, but could also misguide buyers and other interested parties, according to the news source.
Disputes Surrounding Data Eligible For Sale
In addition, exactly what type of customer data RadioShack will be able to sell remains uncertain. Previously, the company said it was looking to sell the personally identifiable information of 117 million customers, the media outlet reported.
However, RadioShack now wants to sell the complete name and address files of 65 million customers, along with what it refers to as “transaction data,” as well as email addresses of another 8.5 million customers, according to the AP.
This transaction data could contain as many as 200 fields, detailing who bought what, where the transaction was made and how much the customer paid, a consultant hired to facilitate the IP sale testified April 28, the media outlet reported.
Request For Disclosure
PrivacyBecause of the wealth of information involved, Hal Morris, a lawyer working for the Texas attorney general’s office, asserted that the court should require RadioShack to provide more detail on exactly what is contained within the transaction data, according to the news source.
He is certainly not alone in bringing up this point. Andrew Vara, acting U.S. Trustee for the RadioShack case, contended earlier this month that because the electronics retailer has provided a “lack of specificity and clarity” surrounding the sale, court-appointed privacy ombudsman Elise Frejka’s ability to perform her duties has suffered, Law360 reported.
In addition, Vara asserted that because RadioShack has not shed enough light on the customer data it wants to sell, the court is unable to consider alternatives that could reduce the harm done to consumer privacy if the sale does indeed take place, according to the news source.
Judge Shannon Weighs In
Amid these concerns, Judge Shannon agreed with Morris’ argument, but did not obligate RadioShack to disclose every one of the 200 fields existing in the consumer database, the AP reported. However, he did provide some guidance on the information the electronics retailer should include.
“I do believe that additional disclosure is necessary with respect to the phrase ‘transaction data,'” said Judge Shannon, according to the news source. In addition, he recommended RadioShack provide a handful of sentences in the summary description that would contain “the sorts of things that I think the typical person might find interesting.”
Even though RadioShack’s attempts to sell customer data have gained some clarity as a result of Judge Shannon agreeing that the company should disclose more detail, these efforts are still facing some resistance, as attorneys representing both AT&T and Verizon Wireless asserted that the electronics retailer is barred from selling the information of customers who bought wireless plans and cell phones at RadioShack stores.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
RadioShack submits to mediation involving customer data
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
RadioShack submits to mediation involving customer data
RadioShack recently agreed to mediation with state attorneys general who have expressed privacy concerns about the sale of the Fort Worth, Texas-based electronics retailer’s customer data. The company consented to this process after the attorneys general of several states raised questions about whether RadioShack in fact has the right to sell this information without breaching its own privacy policies.
Mediation Scheduled For May 14
Amid these concerns, Greg Gordon, attorney for RadioShack, told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon April 28 that the company has agreed to mediation, which was scheduled to begin May 14, according to The Associated Press.
This date falls after an auction of intellectual property assets – which includes the names and addresses of millions of RadioShack’s customers – scheduled for May 11, The Associated Press reported.
However, the attorneys general of Texas, Pennsylvania, Oregon and Tennessee have formally protested this sale, asserting that the details the electronics retailer is providing are not only inadequate, but could also misguide buyers and other interested parties, according to the news source.
Disputes Surrounding Data Eligible For Sale
In addition, exactly what type of customer data RadioShack will be able to sell remains uncertain. Previously, the company said it was looking to sell the personally identifiable information of 117 million customers, the media outlet reported.
However, RadioShack now wants to sell the complete name and address files of 65 million customers, along with what it refers to as “transaction data,” as well as email addresses of another 8.5 million customers, according to the AP.
This transaction data could contain as many as 200 fields, detailing who bought what, where the transaction was made and how much the customer paid, a consultant hired to facilitate the IP sale testified April 28, the media outlet reported.
Request For Disclosure
PrivacyBecause of the wealth of information involved, Hal Morris, a lawyer working for the Texas attorney general’s office, asserted that the court should require RadioShack to provide more detail on exactly what is contained within the transaction data, according to the news source.
He is certainly not alone in bringing up this point. Andrew Vara, acting U.S. Trustee for the RadioShack case, contended earlier this month that because the electronics retailer has provided a “lack of specificity and clarity” surrounding the sale, court-appointed privacy ombudsman Elise Frejka’s ability to perform her duties has suffered, Law360 reported.
In addition, Vara asserted that because RadioShack has not shed enough light on the customer data it wants to sell, the court is unable to consider alternatives that could reduce the harm done to consumer privacy if the sale does indeed take place, according to the news source.
Judge Shannon Weighs In
Amid these concerns, Judge Shannon agreed with Morris’ argument, but did not obligate RadioShack to disclose every one of the 200 fields existing in the consumer database, the AP reported. However, he did provide some guidance on the information the electronics retailer should include.
“I do believe that additional disclosure is necessary with respect to the phrase ‘transaction data,'” said Judge Shannon, according to the news source. In addition, he recommended RadioShack provide a handful of sentences in the summary description that would contain “the sorts of things that I think the typical person might find interesting.”
Even though RadioShack’s attempts to sell customer data have gained some clarity as a result of Judge Shannon agreeing that the company should disclose more detail, these efforts are still facing some resistance, as attorneys representing both AT&T and Verizon Wireless asserted that the electronics retailer is barred from selling the information of customers who bought wireless plans and cell phones at RadioShack stores.