Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
J&J Snack Foods Hit with Bill Regarding Sales & Use Tax
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 25, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
J&J Snack Foods and Sales & Use Tax
In a recent decision, the New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed a Tax Court decision that since a company had assembling operations in the state, this qualified as taxable use. According to a Bloomberg BNA report, the Superior Court of New Jersey upheld the tax court’s decision that J&J Snack Foods, the largest manufacturer of soft pretzels in the country as well as the famous maker of Slush Puppies, was subject to a use tax assessment that totaled $250,000.
The decision held that J&J Snack Foods received machine parts in New Jersey and assembled the parts into pretzel-warming machines for use by customers located in and out-of-state. This was classified as a taxable use of the parts in New Jersey, a provision broadly written to define use as the exercise of the right or power over tangible personal property by the purchaser.
The background of the J&J Snack Foods case
The case originally involved a use tax audit by the state of New Jersey on J&J Snack Foods in 1992, which resulted in the company being told that it was required to pay the tax assessment – regardless of whether or not it sold or loaned any machines to customers within New Jersey borders. However, the company argued that it paid the necessary amount of taxes, and that sales and use taxes were not applicable.
Although in J&J Snack Foods Sales Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, N.J., the Tax Court agreed with the state by asserting that the company was required to pay the use tax on all the machine parts used to assemble warmers, even if the machines themselves were used out of state.
In opposition, the company challenged the application of the tax code by asserting that the Tax Court was mistaken in that the purchase of machine parts for the warmers were retail sales. J&J Snack Foods then alleged that these warmer parts were bought for re-sale, and not as a part of the product to be sold by the company. The company’s argument then was that it was not subject to use taxes because the warmers were not loaned or sold for profit. The company also argued that the State acquiesced in its treatment in the audit from the 1990s and was stopped from raising the issue many years later.
The Appellate Division upholds the Tax Court’s decision
The Tax Court initially ruled that the company’s purchase of the parts and subsequent re-sale, along with the assembling and distribution of the warmers, qualified within the sales and use tax act’s ambit. Therefore, according to a report by the Altus Group, the company owed the use tax, regardless of whether customers used the machine within the state or outside of its borders. In turn, in upholding the Tax Court’s decision, the Superior Court of New Jersey found that J&J Snack Foods owed $258,226.99 in use taxes.
What the decisions means for taxpayers
Sales and use tax imposition can be difficult as it varies state by state. Therefore, as states do not often clarify their positions on the use tax laws, and often oppose each other, it is difficult for taxpayers to understand their tax burdens. For instance, had J&J Snack Foods been incorporated in Wyoming, the company would have not been subject to the sales and use tax because the items produced were prepared for use in a different state.
The significance of the decision from a broader perspective
One of the issues presented by the Superior Court’s upholding of the Tax Court’s decision is that it gives J&J Snack Foods, which has been headquartered in New Jersey for its entire existence, incentive to relocate its operations outside of the state, or outsource the assembling of the warmer machines rather than have them built in New Jersey.
Further, this decision is significant because from a broader perspective, taxpayers should be aware that any operations, regardless of whether these are essential operations of the company, may be subject to the use tax depending on the state law and regulation. Taxpayers can be certain that the absence of symmetry between state statutes can produce unexpected results between states. Taxpayers can also be certain that, as long as state budget deficits persist, they will face aggressive readings of law and regulation by tax collectors.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
J&J Snack Foods Hit with Bill Regarding Sales & Use Tax
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
J&J Snack Foods and Sales & Use Tax
In a recent decision, the New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed a Tax Court decision that since a company had assembling operations in the state, this qualified as taxable use. According to a Bloomberg BNA report, the Superior Court of New Jersey upheld the tax court’s decision that J&J Snack Foods, the largest manufacturer of soft pretzels in the country as well as the famous maker of Slush Puppies, was subject to a use tax assessment that totaled $250,000.
The decision held that J&J Snack Foods received machine parts in New Jersey and assembled the parts into pretzel-warming machines for use by customers located in and out-of-state. This was classified as a taxable use of the parts in New Jersey, a provision broadly written to define use as the exercise of the right or power over tangible personal property by the purchaser.
The background of the J&J Snack Foods case
The case originally involved a use tax audit by the state of New Jersey on J&J Snack Foods in 1992, which resulted in the company being told that it was required to pay the tax assessment – regardless of whether or not it sold or loaned any machines to customers within New Jersey borders. However, the company argued that it paid the necessary amount of taxes, and that sales and use taxes were not applicable.
Although in J&J Snack Foods Sales Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, N.J., the Tax Court agreed with the state by asserting that the company was required to pay the use tax on all the machine parts used to assemble warmers, even if the machines themselves were used out of state.
In opposition, the company challenged the application of the tax code by asserting that the Tax Court was mistaken in that the purchase of machine parts for the warmers were retail sales. J&J Snack Foods then alleged that these warmer parts were bought for re-sale, and not as a part of the product to be sold by the company. The company’s argument then was that it was not subject to use taxes because the warmers were not loaned or sold for profit. The company also argued that the State acquiesced in its treatment in the audit from the 1990s and was stopped from raising the issue many years later.
The Appellate Division upholds the Tax Court’s decision
The Tax Court initially ruled that the company’s purchase of the parts and subsequent re-sale, along with the assembling and distribution of the warmers, qualified within the sales and use tax act’s ambit. Therefore, according to a report by the Altus Group, the company owed the use tax, regardless of whether customers used the machine within the state or outside of its borders. In turn, in upholding the Tax Court’s decision, the Superior Court of New Jersey found that J&J Snack Foods owed $258,226.99 in use taxes.
What the decisions means for taxpayers
Sales and use tax imposition can be difficult as it varies state by state. Therefore, as states do not often clarify their positions on the use tax laws, and often oppose each other, it is difficult for taxpayers to understand their tax burdens. For instance, had J&J Snack Foods been incorporated in Wyoming, the company would have not been subject to the sales and use tax because the items produced were prepared for use in a different state.
The significance of the decision from a broader perspective
One of the issues presented by the Superior Court’s upholding of the Tax Court’s decision is that it gives J&J Snack Foods, which has been headquartered in New Jersey for its entire existence, incentive to relocate its operations outside of the state, or outsource the assembling of the warmer machines rather than have them built in New Jersey.
Further, this decision is significant because from a broader perspective, taxpayers should be aware that any operations, regardless of whether these are essential operations of the company, may be subject to the use tax depending on the state law and regulation. Taxpayers can be certain that the absence of symmetry between state statutes can produce unexpected results between states. Taxpayers can also be certain that, as long as state budget deficits persist, they will face aggressive readings of law and regulation by tax collectors.