
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 23, 2013
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comA government lawsuit, filed by the Justice Department and several states, is seeking to halt the proposed American Airlines merger with US Airways. The merger – the final step in AMR’s exit from bankruptcy protection – would create the largest airline in the world.
The government’s antitrust suit was largely unexpected, as the two airlines have been making notable and unimpeded progress toward their merger in recent weeks. However, the suit will halt those plans, as the Justice Department seeks to prove that the merger will hinder competition and hurt consumers by leading to higher fares and fees. Should the merger be pushed through, the government said, it feared the new airline would control more than 80 percent of the U.S. commercial air market.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia joined in the litigation. In a conference call to reporters, Bill Baer of the Justice Department said that the suit is critical to protecting consumers from hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary and burdensome costs.
“While shareholders might benefit, [and] creditors might benefit from consolidation, the fact of the matter is, consumers will get the shaft,” said Baer. “The right option here is a full-stop injunction.”
US Airways CEO Doug Parker disagreed with the Justice Department’s assertions, especially as the merger has already been approved by the European Union, airline creditors, and airline shareholders.
“We are extremely disappointed in this action and believe the DOJ is wrong in its assessment,” said Parker. “We will fight them.”
A hearing to confirm AMR’s bankruptcy exit plan is expected to move forward on Thursday, and it is unclear how the lawsuit may initially impact the company’s plan to emerge from proceedings.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
A government lawsuit, filed by the Justice Department and several states, is seeking to halt the proposed American Airlines merger with US Airways. The merger – the final step in AMR’s exit from bankruptcy protection – would create the largest airline in the world.
The government’s antitrust suit was largely unexpected, as the two airlines have been making notable and unimpeded progress toward their merger in recent weeks. However, the suit will halt those plans, as the Justice Department seeks to prove that the merger will hinder competition and hurt consumers by leading to higher fares and fees. Should the merger be pushed through, the government said, it feared the new airline would control more than 80 percent of the U.S. commercial air market.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia joined in the litigation. In a conference call to reporters, Bill Baer of the Justice Department said that the suit is critical to protecting consumers from hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary and burdensome costs.
“While shareholders might benefit, [and] creditors might benefit from consolidation, the fact of the matter is, consumers will get the shaft,” said Baer. “The right option here is a full-stop injunction.”
US Airways CEO Doug Parker disagreed with the Justice Department’s assertions, especially as the merger has already been approved by the European Union, airline creditors, and airline shareholders.
“We are extremely disappointed in this action and believe the DOJ is wrong in its assessment,” said Parker. “We will fight them.”
A hearing to confirm AMR’s bankruptcy exit plan is expected to move forward on Thursday, and it is unclear how the lawsuit may initially impact the company’s plan to emerge from proceedings.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!