Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
On Whom Does The Corporate Income Tax Fall?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 19, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
With the real possibility of corporate tax reform being thrown about Washington, an old debate has been reopened regarding on whom the corporate income tax really falls.
Those in favor of abolishing the corporate income tax – a stance that has become increasingly popular with some groups – argue that the corporate income tax necessarily falls on people. This is, of course, completely true. Other than money that sits in corporate accounts, which does no one any good, all of the money that passes through a business eventually makes its way to people. Except for the money taken out by taxes, that is.
It is easy to find writers, talk show hosts and politicians who are ready to argue that you, the consumer, are paying a large share of corporate income tax in the form of higher prices on goods. Tim Worstall, regular contributor to Forbes, says it frequently and with significant zeal.
As Bruce Bartlett, who held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, pointed out in a piece for The New York Times, however, virtually all economists roundly reject this idea. The price of goods is set by market forces, not by corporate income taxes. While prices would likely be affected if corporations were the only suppliers of goods and services, they emphatically are not. There are also sole proprietorships, S-corporations, foreign corporations, nonprofits and partnerships. If a corporation were to attempt to compensate for higher corporate taxes by raising its prices, it would be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply.
Left are shareholders and employees. Bartlett cites an article by economist Arnold Harberger, who demonstrated that, at the time, the corporate tax was probably borne entirely by shareholders. There have been arguments that, over time, some of this burden is shifted to employees because the supply of capital shrinks in order to raise the rate of return.
Bartlett examined several analyses included in the March 2013 issue of The National Tax Journal that attempt to determine on whom the tax falls, but found little consensus. Two out of four articles supported the notion that shareholders bear the entire tax. A third suggested that labor bears a full 60 percent of the corporate tax burden, while a fourth found that 82 percent is born by shareholders, leaving workers with 18 percent of the burden.
Understanding where the burden of the corporate income tax falls is essential if we are to make an informed decision regarding tax reform. What appears clear is that the oft-repeated notion that consumers bear this burden is patently false.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates, Corporate Tax Planning
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
On Whom Does The Corporate Income Tax Fall?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
With the real possibility of corporate tax reform being thrown about Washington, an old debate has been reopened regarding on whom the corporate income tax really falls.
Those in favor of abolishing the corporate income tax – a stance that has become increasingly popular with some groups – argue that the corporate income tax necessarily falls on people. This is, of course, completely true. Other than money that sits in corporate accounts, which does no one any good, all of the money that passes through a business eventually makes its way to people. Except for the money taken out by taxes, that is.
It is easy to find writers, talk show hosts and politicians who are ready to argue that you, the consumer, are paying a large share of corporate income tax in the form of higher prices on goods. Tim Worstall, regular contributor to Forbes, says it frequently and with significant zeal.
As Bruce Bartlett, who held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, pointed out in a piece for The New York Times, however, virtually all economists roundly reject this idea. The price of goods is set by market forces, not by corporate income taxes. While prices would likely be affected if corporations were the only suppliers of goods and services, they emphatically are not. There are also sole proprietorships, S-corporations, foreign corporations, nonprofits and partnerships. If a corporation were to attempt to compensate for higher corporate taxes by raising its prices, it would be undercut by businesses to which the tax does not apply.
Left are shareholders and employees. Bartlett cites an article by economist Arnold Harberger, who demonstrated that, at the time, the corporate tax was probably borne entirely by shareholders. There have been arguments that, over time, some of this burden is shifted to employees because the supply of capital shrinks in order to raise the rate of return.
Bartlett examined several analyses included in the March 2013 issue of The National Tax Journal that attempt to determine on whom the tax falls, but found little consensus. Two out of four articles supported the notion that shareholders bear the entire tax. A third suggested that labor bears a full 60 percent of the corporate tax burden, while a fourth found that 82 percent is born by shareholders, leaving workers with 18 percent of the burden.
Understanding where the burden of the corporate income tax falls is essential if we are to make an informed decision regarding tax reform. What appears clear is that the oft-repeated notion that consumers bear this burden is patently false.