New Jersey businesses should be aware that sending unsolicited faxes could open you up to significant liability.
We have recently learned that several law firms in this area are filing class action lawsuits and preying on local companies, and even non-profit organizations, alleging violations of New Jersey law. On the federal and state level, several statutory prohibitions were enacted with the good intention of stopping the clogging of our fax machines with unsolicited faxes of advertisements by the masses. While that is a good intention of legislators and regulators, some mercenary sole practitioners are seizing on the wording of these business regulations in order to demand damages they have not suffered that they allege should be ordered by local courts on behalf of the purported class of aggrieved recipients.
In New Jersey, the state’s Junk Fax Act prohibits the use of any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited fax to a telephone facsimile machine within the state. The law includes some exceptions to protect non-profit organizations, including professional or trade associations. Businesses who violate the statute face damages of up to $1,000 for each transmission. Violations also constitute an unlawful trade practice under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act.
The federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits the use of “any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement․” The statute contains three notable exceptions: (1) if a prior business relationship exists between the parties; (2) if the recipient voluntarily makes its fax number available for “public distribution”; or, (3) if the advertisement contains a notice informing the recipient of the ability and means to avoid future unsolicited advertisements.
In addition to authorizing regulatory enforcement, the TCPA provides a cause of action. Because the TCPA authorizes statutory damages of $500-$1,500 per violation, which generally exceeds the recipient’s actual damages, violations are attractive to plaintiffs’ class-action lawyers.
In 2013, a New Jersey federal judge certified a class-action lawsuit alleging violations of the TCPA. The case, A & L Indus., Inc. v. P. Cipollini, Inc., involved fax advertisement sent by a roofing company to more than 4,000 recipients via a marketing company. In certifying the class, the federal court declined to follow a New Jersey state court decision that had concluded that “a class action suit is not a superior means of adjudicating a TCPA suit.”
Given the potential for liability, we caution New Jersey businesses against sending out advertisements via fax unless you have a pre-existing business relationship with the recipients. In addition, it is important to understand that many of the same prohibitions also apply to unsolicited text messages.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Beware of Sending Unsolicited Faxes!
Author: Dan Brecher
New Jersey businesses should be aware that sending unsolicited faxes could open you up to significant liability.
We have recently learned that several law firms in this area are filing class action lawsuits and preying on local companies, and even non-profit organizations, alleging violations of New Jersey law. On the federal and state level, several statutory prohibitions were enacted with the good intention of stopping the clogging of our fax machines with unsolicited faxes of advertisements by the masses. While that is a good intention of legislators and regulators, some mercenary sole practitioners are seizing on the wording of these business regulations in order to demand damages they have not suffered that they allege should be ordered by local courts on behalf of the purported class of aggrieved recipients.
In New Jersey, the state’s Junk Fax Act prohibits the use of any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited fax to a telephone facsimile machine within the state. The law includes some exceptions to protect non-profit organizations, including professional or trade associations. Businesses who violate the statute face damages of up to $1,000 for each transmission. Violations also constitute an unlawful trade practice under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act.
The federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits the use of “any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement․” The statute contains three notable exceptions: (1) if a prior business relationship exists between the parties; (2) if the recipient voluntarily makes its fax number available for “public distribution”; or, (3) if the advertisement contains a notice informing the recipient of the ability and means to avoid future unsolicited advertisements.
In addition to authorizing regulatory enforcement, the TCPA provides a cause of action. Because the TCPA authorizes statutory damages of $500-$1,500 per violation, which generally exceeds the recipient’s actual damages, violations are attractive to plaintiffs’ class-action lawyers.
In 2013, a New Jersey federal judge certified a class-action lawsuit alleging violations of the TCPA. The case, A & L Indus., Inc. v. P. Cipollini, Inc., involved fax advertisement sent by a roofing company to more than 4,000 recipients via a marketing company. In certifying the class, the federal court declined to follow a New Jersey state court decision that had concluded that “a class action suit is not a superior means of adjudicating a TCPA suit.”
Given the potential for liability, we caution New Jersey businesses against sending out advertisements via fax unless you have a pre-existing business relationship with the recipients. In addition, it is important to understand that many of the same prohibitions also apply to unsolicited text messages.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
