BP has announced it will take the battle over its multibillion-dollar Gulf of Mexico oil spill settlement to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In the meantime, BP has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans to keep the payment of some claims on hold while it appeals the claims process, arguing it could be irreparably harmed if forced to pay before the dispute is resolved.
By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on March 3rd upheld the U.S. District Court ruling that the settlement’s terms meant even unharmed plaintiffs could receive money. The Courts believed BP knew as much when it agreed to the deal in order to avoid having to litigate each case individually.
After that ruling, BP requested a rehearing by the full appeals court on whether parties must show the spill caused their losses. BP is seeking to avoid paying what it claims would be billions of dollars in unjustified claims. The Fifth Circuit court voted 8-5 against the rehearing. The Court reasoned that the settlement agreement provides the payment of claims is based on a formula, primarily depending on the claimant’s distance from the spill, and BP assented to the terms of the agreement.
BP released a statement announcing its intention to appeal the court order which would result in the company paying claims with no connection to the spill. “No company would agree to pay for losses that it did not cause, and BP certainly did not when it entered into this settlement,” BP said.
In 2012, BP settled with most of the private-party plaintiffs. The initial estimate of the cost of the agreement was $7.8 billion. BP is alleging the claims administrator has improperly interpreted the settlement which has raised the settlement price to $9.2 billion or more.
The appeal is In Re Deepwater Horizon, 13-30095, 13-30315, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans). The lower court case is In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010, 10-md-02179, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
BP is Heading to the Supreme Court
Author: Robert E. Levy
BP has announced it will take the battle over its multibillion-dollar Gulf of Mexico oil spill settlement to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In the meantime, BP has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans to keep the payment of some claims on hold while it appeals the claims process, arguing it could be irreparably harmed if forced to pay before the dispute is resolved.
By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on March 3rd upheld the U.S. District Court ruling that the settlement’s terms meant even unharmed plaintiffs could receive money. The Courts believed BP knew as much when it agreed to the deal in order to avoid having to litigate each case individually.
After that ruling, BP requested a rehearing by the full appeals court on whether parties must show the spill caused their losses. BP is seeking to avoid paying what it claims would be billions of dollars in unjustified claims. The Fifth Circuit court voted 8-5 against the rehearing. The Court reasoned that the settlement agreement provides the payment of claims is based on a formula, primarily depending on the claimant’s distance from the spill, and BP assented to the terms of the agreement.
BP released a statement announcing its intention to appeal the court order which would result in the company paying claims with no connection to the spill. “No company would agree to pay for losses that it did not cause, and BP certainly did not when it entered into this settlement,” BP said.
In 2012, BP settled with most of the private-party plaintiffs. The initial estimate of the cost of the agreement was $7.8 billion. BP is alleging the claims administrator has improperly interpreted the settlement which has raised the settlement price to $9.2 billion or more.
The appeal is In Re Deepwater Horizon, 13-30095, 13-30315, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans). The lower court case is In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010, 10-md-02179, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
